So was OJ
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
CNN Anchor Tells Nancy Pelosi That Trump Was Acquitted — She Interrupts, Claims He Wasn’t
- Thread starter Weatherman2020
- Start date
So was OJ
Trump broke Box Wine Nancy.
Chief Justice Roberts:
"It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the said Donald John Trump be, and he is
hereby, acquitted of the charges in said articles"
She's a lying C**t.
It's amazing how many people only understand how the process works when they get the outcome they want. Just because you don't like the outcome it doesn't change the outcome Trump was acquitted no asterisk no if's and's or butt's end of story. I have seen plenty of trials and investgations in and out of the political world that didn't go how I wanted them to or thought they should that's life the House did it's job the Senate did it's job you don't like the final result tough shit.
Fueri
Platinum Member
- Nov 16, 2015
- 6,268
- 3,982
- 1,065
He was also acquitted.
So was OJ
So were a lot of people for whom there was no real case against them.
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 32,297
- 20,973
- 1,845
She has a point.... Clinton was acquitted after a real trial, with witnesses and with evidence submitted, from both sides....
There was no real trial, with evidence and witnesses in Trumps....
I don't think there was ever a criminal, civic or impeachment trial in our entire history of a Nation, that did not permit witness testimony and documented evidence, as was with this SHAM trial......
THAT will forever be the *asterisk next to the Trump Acquittal.....
they should have just allowed them.... he was going to likely be acquitted anyway, on a partisan basis, but at least it would have made the trial appear to be, a trial and not the shameful, blatant, not questionable, the fix is in SCAM that it was....
Trump wasn't impeached by a real process. Had it been a legit process then by all means have a trial. But they didn't. they broke every rule there is about impeachment. Thus it wasn't legit, thus they don't get their witnesses.
They had a trial
They had witnesses.
They voted not to call additional witnesses.
- Nov 28, 2011
- 42,807
- 15,984
- 2,250
Trump broke Box Wine Nancy.
Chief Justice Roberts:
"It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the said Donald John Trump be, and he is
hereby, acquitted of the charges in said articles"
Pelosi is mentally ill.
TDS makes people that way. LOL
So were a lot of people for whom there was no real case against them.
We'll never know...and are you saying there was no real evidence against OJ?
- Thread starter
- #31
Uh.So were a lot of people for whom there was no real case against them.
We'll never know...and are you saying there was no real evidence against OJ?
bluzman61
Diamond Member
Dr. Grumpy IS quite dim.........Uh.So were a lot of people for whom there was no real case against them.
We'll never know...and are you saying there was no real evidence against OJ?
BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 43,674
- 26,866
- 2,615
You have to remember one thing, Pelosi is the Speaker because she's been there a long time and has senority which gives her some privileges. She represents a very liberal area of California that's dumber than an empty box of Post Toasties. She's not Speaker because of her great ability to govern.
Uh.So were a lot of people for whom there was no real case against them.
We'll never know...and are you saying there was no real evidence against OJ?
I know. I don't expect you to get it....
- Nov 28, 2011
- 42,807
- 15,984
- 2,250
The house abused it's power by putting on a political spectical of a hearing/trial, and it did it all for an epic failure in proportions. It was a complete bullcrap mess in their last gasp of desperation to try and oust a President they didn't like. They just gave the one they hate 4 more years.. lolThere was no trial because the charges didn't measure up. The House didn't do a thorough investigation.She has a point.... Clinton was acquitted after a real trial, with witnesses and with evidence submitted, from both sides....
There was no real trial, with evidence and witnesses in Trumps....
I don't think there was ever a criminal, civic or impeachment trial in our entire history of a Nation, that did not permit witness testimony and documented evidence, as was with this SHAM trial......
THAT will forever be the *asterisk next to the Trump Acquittal.....
they should have just allowed them.... he was going to likely be acquitted anyway, on a partisan basis, but at least it would have made the trial appear to be, a trial and not the shameful, blatant, not questionable, the fix is in SCAM that it was....
JustAnotherNut
Platinum Member
- Dec 31, 2015
- 10,647
- 6,080
- 1,095
wait......you mean CNN got something right????
BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 43,674
- 26,866
- 2,615
The Democrats abused the Constitution. The American people know it. We're about to witness one of the biggest ass kicking in American history. Worse than McGovern and Mondale.The house abused it's power by putting on a political spectical of a hearing/trial, and it did it all for an epic failure in proportions. It was a complete bullcrap mess in their last gasp of desperation to try and oust a President they didn't like. They just gave the one they hate 4 more years.. lolThere was no trial because the charges didn't measure up. The House didn't do a thorough investigation.She has a point.... Clinton was acquitted after a real trial, with witnesses and with evidence submitted, from both sides....
There was no real trial, with evidence and witnesses in Trumps....
I don't think there was ever a criminal, civic or impeachment trial in our entire history of a Nation, that did not permit witness testimony and documented evidence, as was with this SHAM trial......
THAT will forever be the *asterisk next to the Trump Acquittal.....
they should have just allowed them.... he was going to likely be acquitted anyway, on a partisan basis, but at least it would have made the trial appear to be, a trial and not the shameful, blatant, not questionable, the fix is in SCAM that it was....
JustAnotherNut
Platinum Member
- Dec 31, 2015
- 10,647
- 6,080
- 1,095
The house abused it's power by putting on a political spectical of a hearing/trial, and it did it all for an epic failure in proportions. It was a complete bullcrap mess in their last gasp of desperation to try and oust a President they didn't like. They just gave the one they hate 4 more years.. lolThere was no trial because the charges didn't measure up. The House didn't do a thorough investigation.She has a point.... Clinton was acquitted after a real trial, with witnesses and with evidence submitted, from both sides....
There was no real trial, with evidence and witnesses in Trumps....
I don't think there was ever a criminal, civic or impeachment trial in our entire history of a Nation, that did not permit witness testimony and documented evidence, as was with this SHAM trial......
THAT will forever be the *asterisk next to the Trump Acquittal.....
they should have just allowed them.... he was going to likely be acquitted anyway, on a partisan basis, but at least it would have made the trial appear to be, a trial and not the shameful, blatant, not questionable, the fix is in SCAM that it was....
and yet.....'It's on his permanent record'
Funny how they knew they were doomed from the start...…..and that's what they hang on too
BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 43,674
- 26,866
- 2,615
Democrats knew Trump wouldn't be removed, but they counted on the American people turning against Trump by being impeached. Once again they miscalculated.The house abused it's power by putting on a political spectical of a hearing/trial, and it did it all for an epic failure in proportions. It was a complete bullcrap mess in their last gasp of desperation to try and oust a President they didn't like. They just gave the one they hate 4 more years.. lolThere was no trial because the charges didn't measure up. The House didn't do a thorough investigation.She has a point.... Clinton was acquitted after a real trial, with witnesses and with evidence submitted, from both sides....
There was no real trial, with evidence and witnesses in Trumps....
I don't think there was ever a criminal, civic or impeachment trial in our entire history of a Nation, that did not permit witness testimony and documented evidence, as was with this SHAM trial......
THAT will forever be the *asterisk next to the Trump Acquittal.....
they should have just allowed them.... he was going to likely be acquitted anyway, on a partisan basis, but at least it would have made the trial appear to be, a trial and not the shameful, blatant, not questionable, the fix is in SCAM that it was....
and yet.....'It's on his permanent record'
Funny how they knew they were doomed from the start...…..and that's what they hang on too
These Poor lefttards....I almost feel sorry for them......almost.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 10
- Views
- 102
- Replies
- 278
- Views
- 6K
- Poll
- Replies
- 58
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 95
- Views
- 3K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 33
- Views
- 226
- Replies
- 7
- Views
- 48
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8051
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-