CNN analyst: "I've never seen a witness who's lied to Congress, who's lied to court, who's lied to the IRS, who's lied to the Southern District ...

The jury is seeing the receipts. Other testimony has corroborated, including a pattern of behavior. So you are foolish to think they are only relying on Cohen's word.

Second, even to the degree that Cohen's credibility matters, it is matched up directly against that ofbTrump. Trump has no credibility. The trial has been a nonstop embarrassment for him, both personally and legally.

So, when you are done playing with yourself, feel free to respond to these facts.

Tell us more about Michael Cohen's credibility.

LOL

1715718511119.webp
 
Still in full toddler mode? Take all the time you need.

The facts will be here waiting for you.

Will the above be your last emotional meltdown or will you tune in to Joy Reid to steal more saliva-slinging nonsense?
 
While the cultist has his tantrum...

The prosecution is definitely not just relying on Cohen's word. The jury has the receipts and has seen corroborating testimony. Trump's pattern of lying, scoffing at the law, and deceiving the public has been well established.

Of.course it makes infinitely more sense that the personal lawyer acted at the direction of his criminal Co conspirator ( the guy who paid him illegally), than it does to believe the wild defense that Cohen acted alone to please his master.
 
While the cultist has his tantrum...

The prosecution is definitely not just relying on Cohen's word. The jury has the receipts and has seen corroborating testimony. Trump's pattern of lying, scoffing at the law, and deceiving the public has been well established.

Of.course it makes infinitely more sense that the personal lawyer acted at the direction of his criminal Co conspirator ( the guy who paid him illegally), than it does to believe the wild defense that Cohen acted alone to please his master.
Will the prosecution call Mike Avenetti?
 
While the cultist has his tantrum...

The prosecution is definitely not just relying on Cohen's word. The jury has the receipts and has seen corroborating testimony. Trump's pattern of lying, scoffing at the law, and deceiving the public has been well established.

Of.course it makes infinitely more sense that the personal lawyer acted at the direction of his criminal Co conspirator ( the guy who paid him illegally), than it does to believe the wild defense that Cohen acted alone to please his master.

^^^ cutting and pasting of the same flaming tirade suggests there is an OCD-like paranoia that needs professional attention.
 
15th post

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom