CNN Accidently Proves President Trump's Innocence, That Capitol Violence Was Not 'Spur Of The Moment' 'Incited Insurrection'

[BlindBoo]

For real, how many people on here are going to claim "Trump planned it" with no evidence?

He planned something "Wild" for that day. The day when Congress was suppose to accept and count the certified EC votes from the States. Like an arsonist gathers the tender needed to start a fire. All it needed was a spark.

 

[colfax_m]

Did the election not get certified?

Did Congress have to stop counting the votes?

You dodged the question.

Let's try another one..............do you know the difference between stopping something and postponing something? This is a little harder. I'm rootin' for ya!

I’m sorry, I thought the clarion call was stop the steal, not postpone the steal. They literally told us their intent.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

He planned something "Wild" for that day. The day when Congress was suppose to accept and count the certified EC votes from the States. Like an arsonist gathers the tender needed to start a fire. All it needed was a spark.

Again, you're making massive assumptions, jumping from point A to F and filling in the middle with fan fiction.

Can you prove Trump at all planned and coordinated a violent attack by a few hundred people?

Yes or no.

No, you cannot. You have to back off your position and resort to "he used charged language", which he did. But, that's a different point, status quo in politics today, and not the same as the initial claim. If you can't support the initial claim, then stop saying it. The constant retreat only makes you look foolish in the realm of a debate.

 

[Foreigner Looking In.]

Cop dies of a stroke in Washington.......Trump's fault.
Islamists behead Christians while quoting the Koran.....Nothing to do with Islam.
That's the leftist logic.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Cop dies of a stroke in Washington.......Trump's fault.
Islamists behead Christians while quoting the Koran.....Nothing to do with Islam.
That's the leftist logic.

Yes, when it comes to leftists, media, and Democrats... When violence happens that is any way linked to the right, it's due to the ideology itself, and GOP and Conservative leaders caused it, orchestrated it, and are evil. When the violence happens that is linked to the left, it's a display of truth to a wrong in society, their anger justifies their violence, but they're all just lone wolves that have nothing to do with leftism or the Democrat party.

Double standards for days.

 

[BlindBoo]

He planned something "Wild" for that day. The day when Congress was suppose to accept and count the certified EC votes from the States. Like an arsonist gathers the tender needed to start a fire. All it needed was a spark.

Again, you're making massive assumptions, jumping from point A to F and filling in the middle with fan fiction.

Can you prove Trump at all planned and coordinated a violent attack by a few hundred people?

Yes or no.

No, you cannot. You have to back off your position and resort to "he used charged language", which he did. But, that's a different point, status quo in politics today, and not the same as the initial claim. If you can't support the initial claim, then stop saying it. The constant retreat only makes you look foolish in the realm of a debate.

Something wild happened. No doubt he was calling all his good people to the protest like those he told to "Stand By" Like an inexperience arsonist, he didn't realize how fast and how destructive the fire he sparked would be. Afterwards, when he saw the results, he did nothing to stop it. He seemed pleased when he tweeted during the violence takeover:

“These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously & viciously stripped away from great patriots who have been badly & unfairly treated for so long,” -djt

 

[Mr. Friscus]

He planned something "Wild" for that day. The day when Congress was suppose to accept and count the certified EC votes from the States. Like an arsonist gathers the tender needed to start a fire. All it needed was a spark.

Again, you're making massive assumptions, jumping from point A to F and filling in the middle with fan fiction.

Can you prove Trump at all planned and coordinated a violent attack by a few hundred people?

Yes or no.

No, you cannot. You have to back off your position and resort to "he used charged language", which he did. But, that's a different point, status quo in politics today, and not the same as the initial claim. If you can't support the initial claim, then stop saying it. The constant retreat only makes you look foolish in the realm of a debate.

Something wild happened. No doubt he was calling all his good people to the protest like those he told to "Stand By" Like an inexperience arsonist, he didn't realize how fast and how destructive the fire he sparked would be. Afterwards, when he saw the results, he did nothing to stop it. He seemed pleased when he tweeted during the violence takeover:

“These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously & viciously stripped away from great patriots who have been badly & unfairly treated for so long,” -djt

Why are you ignoring where he denounced the violence? He literally denounced it. You're writing fan fiction.

Meanwhile, you're purposefully mixing up the meaning of the term "stand by". Stand down, stand aside. That's clearly what he meant. You're like Joe Biden, who lied and said Trump said "stand ready". That's a provable lie. He said he doesn't even know anything about them, nor do most people, and rightfully so. They're a nothing in society, unlike BLM who is supported by Democrats, corporations, etc. Why would Trump want a group he now denounces and knows little to nothing about on "standby"?

 

[BlindBoo]

Meanwhile, you're purposefully mixing up the meaning of the term "stand by". Stand down, stand aside. That's clearly what he meant.

He clearly said "Stand back and stand by.".

 

[Asclepias]

Nancy Pelosi and Democrats have just Impeached the President for 'Inciting an Insurrection' during a Protest in DC through the speech he gave to the gathered throng of supporters. .

Prior to passing the Articles of Impeachment Pelosi confessed during an interview that the true intent of the up-coming 2nd Impeachment was to eliminate President Trump as a future political threat to the Democratic party. Her confession alone proves the 2nd Impeachment, like the 1st, is an abuse of power and of the Constitution.

CNN just accidently proved the President is innocent, as well, with their inept, unintentional reporting:

"According to a new report from CNN, “Evidence uncovered so far, including weapons and tactics seen on surveillance video, suggests a level of planning that has led investigators to believe the attack on the US Capitol was not just a protest that spiraled out of control, a federal law enforcement official says.” This completely undermines the entire case Democrats made for impeaching Trump."

Pelosi and Trump-hating traitors claim Trump spontaneously incited the crowd into 'Insurrection'. The police say the event was pre-planned, supplied, and carried out, adding that evidence shows Capitol Police appear on video removing barriers to give violent rioters entrance into the Capitol and are shown LEADING rioters - to include members identified as BLM members - through the building. This DESTROYS the Democrats' lies / false narrative.


Pelosi, Democrats, Fake News Media, and snowflakes keep parroting the same lie / false talking point that President Trump 'Incited an Insurrection'; however, they refuse to give one quote in his speech they claim is evidence of his 'Inciting an Insurrection'. Perhaps because Trump only said that after his speech they "were going to walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators, and congressmen and women.” That hardly sounds like inciting violence, does it?


'It is clear that Democrats wanted an excuse to impeach Trump again to make him “the first president in history to be impeached twice,” and rushed through impeachment, without an investigation, over a couple of days because Trump would soon be out of office.'

Thanks to CNN, President Trump won't be remembered as the 1st President to be Impeached Twice. The Democrats will be known as the treasonous party that abused the Constitutional powers of impeachment to carry out 2 (TWO) un-warranted, politically partisan Impeachments based on ZERO crime, ZERO evidence, and ZERO witnesses!

Did CNN Accidentally Prove That Trump Did NOT Call for Violence at the Capitol?

The political Left and their allies in the mainstream media have gloated over the second impeachment of Trump. In record time, an article of impeachment alleging President Trump incited an insurrectio...

pjmedia.com

Giving the terrorists a pep talk is still incitement. Your OP is a fail.

 

[Nostra]

Did the election not get certified?

Did Congress have to stop counting the votes?

You dodged the question.

Let's try another one..............do you know the difference between stopping something and postponing something? This is a little harder. I'm rootin' for ya!

I’m sorry, I thought the clarion call was stop the steal, not postpone the steal. They literally told us their intent.

Doesn't matter what you thought, Stupid.

The vote wasn't stopped, it was postponed.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Of course the attack was planned, and trump helped to plan and orchestrate it. It's clear that he knew what was in place when he gave his speech.

The attack with the sum total of a broken window and door panel?
Where they formed an orderly queue between the velvet ropes?
Where nobody came with a gun?
Where they btook selfies of themselves carrying out "insurrection" then left peacefully?

Did you watch the film? They were hitting people with crutches and flag poles. Is that normal peaceful protest in your book?

A storm in a teacup.

An attempted coup at out capitol.

No, Pro Democracy protesters opposing a coup by oligarchs and technocrats.
Would happen in any country given the absolute state of the corrupt election count,

Nope. There is no doubt what the purpose was.

No Trump people had guns. No guns, no revolution. Hell, no insurrection either. Just a nice simple protest. Only the Trump people didn't knock over statures, or try to set fires like your assholes did.

When did liberals storm the capitol in an effort to overthrow congressional action on an election?

They tried to stop the inauguration of an elected President using extreme violence and threats. Why was it not classified as insurrection?

When did they erect a scaffold with hangman's noose in front of the capitol, and then attack the capitol yelling "where is Pence" ?

You mean the hangman's noose that was totally inoperable?

What a silly remark

You mean a truthful remark.
You have a rope tied off to a crossbeam,a footlong piece of rope with a noose at the terminal end.
How exactly would you hang someone with this contraption?
It was obviously a symbolic gesture....but leave to a dem to think it's would actually function.

 

[colfax_m]

Doesn't matter what you thought, Stupid.

I didn’t think it, I heard it. The slogan was stop the steal. The intent was to stop Biden from being inaugurated.

 

[westwall]

Of course the attack was planned, and trump helped to plan and orchestrate it. It's clear that he knew what was in place when he gave his speech.

The attack with the sum total of a broken window and door panel?
Where they formed an orderly queue between the velvet ropes?
Where nobody came with a gun?
Where they btook selfies of themselves carrying out "insurrection" then left peacefully?

Did you watch the film? They were hitting people with crutches and flag poles. Is that normal peaceful protest in your book?

A storm in a teacup.

An attempted coup at out capitol.

No, Pro Democracy protesters opposing a coup by oligarchs and technocrats.
Would happen in any country given the absolute state of the corrupt election count,

Nope. There is no doubt what the purpose was.

No Trump people had guns. No guns, no revolution. Hell, no insurrection either. Just a nice simple protest. Only the Trump people didn't knock over statures, or try to set fires like your assholes did.

When did liberals storm the capitol in an effort to overthrow congressional action on an election?

They tried to stop the inauguration of an elected President using extreme violence and threats. Why was it not classified as insurrection?

When did they erect a scaffold with hangman's noose in front of the capitol, and then attack the capitol yelling "where is Pence" ?

You mean the hangman's noose that was totally inoperable?

What a silly remark

You mean a truthful remark.
You have a rope tied off to a crossbeam,a footlong piece of rope with a noose at the terminal end.
How exactly would you hang someone with this contraption?
It was obviously a symbolic gesture....but leave to a dem to think it's would actually function.

Awful big assumption you are making about Dems being able to think in the first place.

 

[Bobob]

Of course the attack was planned, and trump helped to plan and orchestrate it. It's clear that he knew what was in place when he gave his speech.

The attack with the sum total of a broken window and door panel?
Where they formed an orderly queue between the velvet ropes?
Where nobody came with a gun?
Where they btook selfies of themselves carrying out "insurrection" then left peacefully?

Did you watch the film? They were hitting people with crutches and flag poles. Is that normal peaceful protest in your book?

A storm in a teacup.

An attempted coup at out capitol.

No, Pro Democracy protesters opposing a coup by oligarchs and technocrats.
Would happen in any country given the absolute state of the corrupt election count,

Nope. There is no doubt what the purpose was.

No Trump people had guns. No guns, no revolution. Hell, no insurrection either. Just a nice simple protest. Only the Trump people didn't knock over statures, or try to set fires like your assholes did.

When did liberals storm the capitol in an effort to overthrow congressional action on an election?

They tried to stop the inauguration of an elected President using extreme violence and threats. Why was it not classified as insurrection?

When did they erect a scaffold with hangman's noose in front of the capitol, and then attack the capitol yelling "where is Pence" ?

You mean the hangman's noose that was totally inoperable?

What a silly remark

You mean a truthful remark.
You have a rope tied off to a crossbeam,a footlong piece of rope with a noose at the terminal end.
How exactly would you hang someone with this contraption?
It was obviously a symbolic gesture....but leave to a dem to think it's would actually function.

Are you daffy? Nobody imagined that they would defile our Capital, either.
Some of them obviously thought that they could pull it off. They attacked our Capital, and I never believed that Americans, no matter what their political beliefs, would ever pull a stunt as they did. Obviously, they don't give a shit about their country because there is no excuse for it. If they love my country, then find another way, but to kill and destroy? Nah. They succeeded in dividing us more. A bunch of criminals.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Of course the attack was planned, and trump helped to plan and orchestrate it. It's clear that he knew what was in place when he gave his speech.

The attack with the sum total of a broken window and door panel?
Where they formed an orderly queue between the velvet ropes?
Where nobody came with a gun?
Where they btook selfies of themselves carrying out "insurrection" then left peacefully?

Did you watch the film? They were hitting people with crutches and flag poles. Is that normal peaceful protest in your book?

A storm in a teacup.

An attempted coup at out capitol.

No, Pro Democracy protesters opposing a coup by oligarchs and technocrats.
Would happen in any country given the absolute state of the corrupt election count,

Nope. There is no doubt what the purpose was.

No Trump people had guns. No guns, no revolution. Hell, no insurrection either. Just a nice simple protest. Only the Trump people didn't knock over statures, or try to set fires like your assholes did.

When did liberals storm the capitol in an effort to overthrow congressional action on an election?

They tried to stop the inauguration of an elected President using extreme violence and threats. Why was it not classified as insurrection?

When did they erect a scaffold with hangman's noose in front of the capitol, and then attack the capitol yelling "where is Pence" ?

You mean the hangman's noose that was totally inoperable?

What a silly remark

You mean a truthful remark.
You have a rope tied off to a crossbeam,a footlong piece of rope with a noose at the terminal end.
How exactly would you hang someone with this contraption?
It was obviously a symbolic gesture....but leave to a dem to think it's would actually function.

Are you daffy? Nobody imagined that they would defile our Capital, either.

I suggest you look up John Sullivan.
While you may actually do it I dont expect you to respond or comment on your findings.

 

[Bobob]

Did the election not get certified?

Did Congress have to stop counting the votes?

You dodged the question.

Let's try another one..............do you know the difference between stopping something and postponing something? This is a little harder. I'm rootin' for ya!

I’m sorry, I thought the clarion call was stop the steal, not postpone the steal. They literally told us their intent.

Doesn't matter what you thought, Stupid.

The vote wasn't stopped, it was postponed.

Those criminals thought that they stopped the vote, and that is why Trump was going to meet them at the Capital gates.

 

[Bobob]

He planned something "Wild" for that day. The day when Congress was suppose to accept and count the certified EC votes from the States. Like an arsonist gathers the tender needed to start a fire. All it needed was a spark.

Again, you're making massive assumptions, jumping from point A to F and filling in the middle with fan fiction.

Can you prove Trump at all planned and coordinated a violent attack by a few hundred people?

Yes or no.

No, you cannot. You have to back off your position and resort to "he used charged language", which he did. But, that's a different point, status quo in politics today, and not the same as the initial claim. If you can't support the initial claim, then stop saying it. The constant retreat only makes you look foolish in the realm of a debate.

Trump encouraged insurrection. He had experience in conning gullible people and knew exactly what he was doing.

 

[Bobob]

He planned something "Wild" for that day. The day when Congress was suppose to accept and count the certified EC votes from the States. Like an arsonist gathers the tender needed to start a fire. All it needed was a spark.

Again, you're making massive assumptions, jumping from point A to F and filling in the middle with fan fiction.

Can you prove Trump at all planned and coordinated a violent attack by a few hundred people?

Yes or no.

No, you cannot. You have to back off your position and resort to "he used charged language", which he did. But, that's a different point, status quo in politics today, and not the same as the initial claim. If you can't support the initial claim, then stop saying it. The constant retreat only makes you look foolish in the realm of a debate.

Something wild happened. No doubt he was calling all his good people to the protest like those he told to "Stand By" Like an inexperience arsonist, he didn't realize how fast and how destructive the fire he sparked would be. Afterwards, when he saw the results, he did nothing to stop it. He seemed pleased when he tweeted during the violence takeover:

“These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously & viciously stripped away from great patriots who have been badly & unfairly treated for so long,” -djt

Why are you ignoring where he denounced the violence? He literally denounced it. You're writing fan fiction.

Meanwhile, you're purposefully mixing up the meaning of the term "stand by". Stand down, stand aside. That's clearly what he meant. You're like Joe Biden, who lied and said Trump said "stand ready". That's a provable lie. He said he doesn't even know anything about them, nor do most people, and rightfully so. They're a nothing in society, unlike BLM who is supported by Democrats, corporations, etc. Why would Trump want a group he now denounces and knows little to nothing about on "standby"?

There is no excuse for Trump making that incendiary remark. All he needed to know is that they are violent and I know that Trump lives by the lie.

 

[Bobob]

Cop dies of a stroke in Washington.......Trump's fault.
Islamists behead Christians while quoting the Koran.....Nothing to do with Islam.
That's the leftist logic.

Cop dies of a stroke during a siege. Trump's fault. Islamists behead Christians while quoting the Koran. Has everything to do with Islamist extremists.

 

[Bobob]

Of course the attack was planned, and trump helped to plan and orchestrate it. It's clear that he knew what was in place when he gave his speech.

The attack with the sum total of a broken window and door panel?
Where they formed an orderly queue between the velvet ropes?
Where nobody came with a gun?
Where they btook selfies of themselves carrying out "insurrection" then left peacefully?

Did you watch the film? They were hitting people with crutches and flag poles. Is that normal peaceful protest in your book?

A storm in a teacup.

An attempted coup at out capitol.

No, Pro Democracy protesters opposing a coup by oligarchs and technocrats.
Would happen in any country given the absolute state of the corrupt election count,

Nope. There is no doubt what the purpose was.

No Trump people had guns. No guns, no revolution. Hell, no insurrection either. Just a nice simple protest. Only the Trump people didn't knock over statures, or try to set fires like your assholes did.

When did liberals storm the capitol in an effort to overthrow congressional action on an election?

They tried to stop the inauguration of an elected President using extreme violence and threats. Why was it not classified as insurrection?

When did they erect a scaffold with hangman's noose in front of the capitol, and then attack the capitol yelling "where is Pence" ?

You mean the hangman's noose that was totally inoperable?

You mean that the call to "hang Pence" was only meant to be a funny? Nah. They meant it and their attempt was poorly organized, as is most of Trump's follies. Had the Capital been properly defended, those criminals would not have lived to see another day.