Clippers Owner Donald Sterling Tells Girlfriend: Don’t Bring Black People

[Billo_Really]

Everyone?!?!??

As opposed to...?

You have your choice:

the un-sensitive
or
the in-sensitive.​

 

[MikeK]

This is the most attention anyone has paid to bouncy ball in a while. At this point, they are less popular than the NHL and declining by the day, so I guess any shitlib whining by the press to get them coverage is good for their bottom line.

You very rarely see Jews cannibalize their own. And make no mistake, the NBA is run by Jews with mostly Jewish owners. If he is getting canned for these remarks, it is very unlikely that the Tribe is merely doing it to maintain anti-racist cred. Because tribal loyalty trumps that. There probably is some angle to this, he probably pissed off the wrong guy. From the little I read, there is a good chance he got set up.

[...]

You might have a point about there being a conspiracy and a set-up, but one thing remains troubling to me.

If what we heard was a private telephone conversation between Sterling and his girlfriend, while it would be legal for either Sterling or the girl to record that conversation it is a violation of federal law to reveal its content without permission of both parties. Yet, even though Sterling is a lawyer we haven't heard a word about that. So there is something peculiar about that situation.

 

[LockeJaw]

They want to be seen as sensitive.

Everyone?!?!??

As opposed to...?

Yep. Lemming mentality. One person calls it horrible, hateful, antagonistic racism, and the lefty media runs with it and people are afraid to say "Its no big deal. Free speech." Same kind of thing, except less derogatory, that rappers say every day and no one sues them or even hates them.

One ex basketballer went on national television and A) Either told a bald faced lie or B) Admitted to being the biggest ***** on planet Earth...Talking about how he woke up crying over this situation.

DS is an asshole, he deserves everything he is getting. But give me a damn break! Crying over some audio of a belligerent old man being coaxed into saying outrageously stupid shit? That's laying it on a bit thick.

Interesting convo starter-Yes, this story is. Earth shattering, wailing & gnashing of teeth, waking up balling like a newborn infant with an empty tummy? Not so much.

 

[MarcATL]

This is the most attention anyone has paid to bouncy ball in a while. At this point, they are less popular than the NHL and declining by the day, so I guess any shitlib whining by the press to get them coverage is good for their bottom line.

You very rarely see Jews cannibalize their own. And make no mistake, the NBA is run by Jews with mostly Jewish owners. If he is getting canned for these remarks, it is very unlikely that the Tribe is merely doing it to maintain anti-racist cred. Because tribal loyalty trumps that. There probably is some angle to this, he probably pissed off the wrong guy. From the little I read, there is a good chance he got set up.

[...]

You might have a point about there being a conspiracy and a set-up, but one thing remains troubling to me.

If what we heard was a private telephone conversation between Sterling and his girlfriend, while it would be legal for either Sterling or the girl to record that conversation it is a violation of federal law to reveal its content without permission of both parties. Yet, even though Sterling is a lawyer we haven't heard a word about that. So there is something peculiar about that situation.

That's not true.

Privacy laws vary according to the state, if I'm not mistaken.

Post the law that states what you suggested it does.

 

[Nutz]

This is the most attention anyone has paid to bouncy ball in a while. At this point, they are less popular than the NHL and declining by the day, so I guess any shitlib whining by the press to get them coverage is good for their bottom line.

You very rarely see Jews cannibalize their own. And make no mistake, the NBA is run by Jews with mostly Jewish owners. If he is getting canned for these remarks, it is very unlikely that the Tribe is merely doing it to maintain anti-racist cred. Because tribal loyalty trumps that. There probably is some angle to this, he probably pissed off the wrong guy. From the little I read, there is a good chance he got set up.

[...]

You might have a point about there being a conspiracy and a set-up, but one thing remains troubling to me.

If what we heard was a private telephone conversation between Sterling and his girlfriend, while it would be legal for either Sterling or the girl to record that conversation it is a violation of federal law to reveal its content without permission of both parties. Yet, even though Sterling is a lawyer we haven't heard a word about that. So there is something peculiar about that situation.

Sterling is said to record all of his phone calls...whether that is true or not, I am not sure. Just what I heard on one of the stations...I think FNC.

 

[Smilebong]

This is the most attention anyone has paid to bouncy ball in a while. At this point, they are less popular than the NHL and declining by the day, so I guess any shitlib whining by the press to get them coverage is good for their bottom line.

You very rarely see Jews cannibalize their own. And make no mistake, the NBA is run by Jews with mostly Jewish owners. If he is getting canned for these remarks, it is very unlikely that the Tribe is merely doing it to maintain anti-racist cred. Because tribal loyalty trumps that. There probably is some angle to this, he probably pissed off the wrong guy. From the little I read, there is a good chance he got set up.

[...]

You might have a point about there being a conspiracy and a set-up, but one thing remains troubling to me.

If what we heard was a private telephone conversation between Sterling and his girlfriend, while it would be legal for either Sterling or the girl to record that conversation it is a violation of federal law to reveal its content without permission of both parties. Yet, even though Sterling is a lawyer we haven't heard a word about that. So there is something peculiar about that situation.

That's not true.

Privacy laws vary according to the state, if I'm not mistaken.

Post the law that states what you suggested it does.

"In the United States, federal agencies may be authorized to engage in wiretaps by the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, a court with secret proceedings, in certain circumstances.

Federal law requires that at least one party taking part in the call must be notified of the recording (18 U.S.C. §2511(2)(d)). For example, it would be illegal to record, without notification, the phone calls of people who come into a place of business and ask to use the telephone. Several states require that all parties consent when one party wants to record a telephone conversation.
...

Twelve states currently require that all parties consent to the recording: California,[19] Connecticut,[20] Florida,[21] Hawaii ..."

Telephone recording laws - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Nutz]

This is the most attention anyone has paid to bouncy ball in a while. At this point, they are less popular than the NHL and declining by the day, so I guess any shitlib whining by the press to get them coverage is good for their bottom line.

You very rarely see Jews cannibalize their own. And make no mistake, the NBA is run by Jews with mostly Jewish owners. If he is getting canned for these remarks, it is very unlikely that the Tribe is merely doing it to maintain anti-racist cred. Because tribal loyalty trumps that. There probably is some angle to this, he probably pissed off the wrong guy. From the little I read, there is a good chance he got set up.

[...]

You might have a point about there being a conspiracy and a set-up, but one thing remains troubling to me.

If what we heard was a private telephone conversation between Sterling and his girlfriend, while it would be legal for either Sterling or the girl to record that conversation it is a violation of federal law to reveal its content without permission of both parties. Yet, even though Sterling is a lawyer we haven't heard a word about that. So there is something peculiar about that situation.

That's not true.

Privacy laws vary according to the state, if I'm not mistaken.

Post the law that states what you suggested it does.

I believe in CA, both parties have to agree to be recorded.

 

[JimBowie1958]

What happened ***** boy, did a black man **** your overweight daughter?

lololol, why is it that libtard pricks like you always have to try to play some dick envy bullshit?

You ******* perverts cant get your mind off that shit can you?

BTW, if my daughter dated a black guy, as long as he is Christian he would be her business.

I would rather my kids marry Christian blacks than drug addicted pop culture stupid ass white drones like most of her class mates.

BTW, go **** yourself, shit eating fagot.

Dude, it's "******."

I was typing in French, dude.

roflmao

 

[MikeK]

It wasn't jarring. It might have been stupid, but not jarring. I hear worse than that all the time in rap music. Sue them.

So why is every decent human being in the media, on social media and in society in general reacting so harshly towards it?

Why are all these good people repulsed by it Smilebong?

They want to be seen as sensitive.

I think you're right on. These anomalous reactions to Sterling's faux pas is the converse of the usual anti-racism rhetoric which so many Americans have been conditioned (brainwashed) to offer at every opportunity in spite of the fact that it's completely insincere and entirely deceptive. And the most interesting thing about it is they are utterly unaware of their deceptive pose.

This is especially true of the category commonly known as limousine liberals who live in a totally White world and, except for a few well-lettered mulatto friends who visit on News Years Eve and Fourth of July, have absolutely no contact with Blacks. These self-deluded pretenders will tearfully protest the slightest suggestion of racist sentiment yet if a son or daughter brought home a Black betrothed they would become catatonic.

And, again, they are not consciously aware of this superimposed delusion. It functions reflexively.

 

[MikeK]

This is the most attention anyone has paid to bouncy ball in a while. At this point, they are less popular than the NHL and declining by the day, so I guess any shitlib whining by the press to get them coverage is good for their bottom line.

You very rarely see Jews cannibalize their own. And make no mistake, the NBA is run by Jews with mostly Jewish owners. If he is getting canned for these remarks, it is very unlikely that the Tribe is merely doing it to maintain anti-racist cred. Because tribal loyalty trumps that. There probably is some angle to this, he probably pissed off the wrong guy. From the little I read, there is a good chance he got set up.

[...]

You might have a point about there being a conspiracy and a set-up, but one thing remains troubling to me.

If what we heard was a private telephone conversation between Sterling and his girlfriend, while it would be legal for either Sterling or the girl to record that conversation it is a violation of federal law to reveal its content without permission of both parties. Yet, even though Sterling is a lawyer we haven't heard a word about that. So there is something peculiar about that situation.

That's not true.

Privacy laws vary according to the state, if I'm not mistaken.

Post the law that states what you suggested it does.

You're probably right -- which is why no issue has been made of it.

 

[Smilebong]

You might have a point about there being a conspiracy and a set-up, but one thing remains troubling to me.

If what we heard was a private telephone conversation between Sterling and his girlfriend, while it would be legal for either Sterling or the girl to record that conversation it is a violation of federal law to reveal its content without permission of both parties. Yet, even though Sterling is a lawyer we haven't heard a word about that. So there is something peculiar about that situation.

That's not true.

Privacy laws vary according to the state, if I'm not mistaken.

Post the law that states what you suggested it does.

You're probably right -- which is why no issue has been made of it.

Read reply 650.

 

[longly]

Sterling might be smart a businessman, but he is dumb when it come to women. Look at what he paid; hell , he could have gotten two blondes for half that: ( a little humor )


In March, Sterling’s wife, Rochelle, sued Stiviano, claiming she had received more than $2.5 million in lavish gifts from the Clippers owner and they needed to be returned. A big piece of the suit involves a duplex Stiviano purchased in December for nearly $1.8 million with money that Rochelle Sterling claims Stiviano received from her husband. Stiviano’s name appears on the deed, and Rochelle Sterling is asking a judge to transfer the property to her and her husband.

 

[Politico]

So a hospital should be able to turn away a grievously wounded black/white/Asian/Latino/whatever person if the hospital CEO happens not to like this or that 'type' of person?

A black/white/Asian/Latino/whatever person pulling into the parking lot of the last motel/gas station for a hundred miles should be turned away in the middle of the night, perhaps into the teeth of a crushing storm, because the clerk at the desk doesn't like this or that type of person?

I don't think you've considered your position carefully.

If it is a private business I should be able to turn someone away because I don't like their haircut.

 

[Unkotare]

So a hospital should be able to turn away a grievously wounded black/white/Asian/Latino/whatever person if the hospital CEO happens not to like this or that 'type' of person?

A black/white/Asian/Latino/whatever person pulling into the parking lot of the last motel/gas station for a hundred miles should be turned away in the middle of the night, perhaps into the teeth of a crushing storm, because the clerk at the desk doesn't like this or that type of person?

I don't think you've considered your position carefully.

If it is a private business I should be able to turn someone away because I don't like their haircut.

Ok, so a private hospital should let a person die in their lobby if they don't like their haircut? The owner of that motel/gas station comes out after the blizzard to find a family frozen to death in their car because he didn't like the haircut of one or several of them and that's ok with you?

 

[Billo_Really]

Ok, so a private hospital should let a person die in their lobby if they don't like their haircut? The owner of that motel/gas station comes out after the blizzard to find a family frozen to death in their car because he didn't like the haircut of one or several of them and that's ok with you?

Yes, I'm okay with that.

 

[Unkotare]

Ok, so a private hospital should let a person die in their lobby if they don't like their haircut? The owner of that motel/gas station comes out after the blizzard to find a family frozen to death in their car because he didn't like the haircut of one or several of them and that's ok with you?

Yes, I'm okay with that.

Then you're a scumbag piece of shit.

 

[MarcATL]

"In the United States, federal agencies may be authorized to engage in wiretaps by the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, a court with secret proceedings, in certain circumstances.

Federal law requires that at least one party taking part in the call must be notified of the recording (18 U.S.C. §2511(2)(d)). For example, it would be illegal to record, without notification, the phone calls of people who come into a place of business and ask to use the telephone. Several states require that all parties consent when one party wants to record a telephone conversation.
...

Twelve states currently require that all parties consent to the recording: California,[19] Connecticut,[20] Florida,[21] Hawaii ..."

Telephone recording laws - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I believe in CA, both parties have to agree to be recorded.

That's not true.

Privacy laws vary according to the state, if I'm not mistaken.

Post the law that states what you suggested it does.

You're probably right -- which is why no issue has been made of it.

SmileBong posted the law, so thanks for that.

However, it confirms that no long was broken. It says that BOTH parties need to consent, which they already have. Remember, Sterling requested that their calls be recorded so he can remember what was said. So that already takes care of that.

No crime committed, and many pundits, particularly on the radio, even on the left, are getting that tid-bit wrong, calling her a "creep" for recording the calls, when it was already agreed upon and was well-known by both parties.

 

[Desperado]

"In the United States, federal agencies may be authorized to engage in wiretaps by the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, a court with secret proceedings, in certain circumstances.

Federal law requires that at least one party taking part in the call must be notified of the recording (18 U.S.C. §2511(2)(d)). For example, it would be illegal to record, without notification, the phone calls of people who come into a place of business and ask to use the telephone. Several states require that all parties consent when one party wants to record a telephone conversation.
...

Twelve states currently require that all parties consent to the recording: California,[19] Connecticut,[20] Florida,[21] Hawaii ..."

Telephone recording laws - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I believe in CA, both parties have to agree to be recorded.

That's not true.

Privacy laws vary according to the state, if I'm not mistaken.

Post the law that states what you suggested it does.

You're probably right -- which is why no issue has been made of it.

SmileBong posted the law, so thanks for that.

However, it confirms that no long was broken. It says that BOTH parties need to consent, which they already have. Remember, Sterling requested that their calls be recorded so he can remember what was said. So that already takes care of that.

No crime committed, and many pundits, particularly on the radio, even on the left, are getting that tid-bit wrong, calling her a "creep" for recording the calls, when it was already agreed upon and was well-known by both parties.

She is worse than a "creep" for making the tape public! That is the crime.
Now she claims that she had nothing to do with the tape becoming public:
Stiviano 'devastated' that tapes were released, attorney says
Stiviano 'devastated' that tapes were released, attorney says - latimes.com

So the question remains How did TMZ get the tape?
That is where the crime was committed.

 

[MarcATL]

She is worse than a "creep" for making the tape public! That is the crime.
Now she claims that she had nothing to do with the tape becoming public:
Stiviano 'devastated' that tapes were released, attorney says
Stiviano 'devastated' that tapes were released, attorney says - latimes.com

So the question remains How did TMZ get the tape?
That is where the crime was committed.

On one hand you post a credible link stating that she WASN'T the one to release the tape, and on the other you continue to call her a creep.

You're not being fair nor sane.

 

[hangover]

You can't be racist if you are an NBA owner, but you can if you're a politician, or Israel.