Clinton Email Discussions An Easy Plus For Democrats--Equal Rights Identified!

mascale

Gold Member
Feb 22, 2009
6,836
800
130
The Governor of Colorado seems to have put it best, quoted in an article on "The Hill."
_______________________________
"Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, a Democratic superdelegate supporting Clinton, also weighed in, saying he thinks Clinton is unfairly criticized based on her gender. He said Clinton made a mistake and it's time to move on."
"'If she were a man, all this stuff wouldn't be at the same level. There's an awful lot of criticism ... over things that really aren't that — I guess a man, it wouldn't be brought up like that," Hickenlooper said on CBS's "Face the Nation.'"

"She's probably the most prepared person to run for high political office in this country in several decades."
__________________________________
The Republicans plan to unleash the Trump filth campaign on the electorate: Trump even plying that some baby genitalia are not equal to other baby genitalia, not allowed active life in the United States. That has long been the GOP brand. Now it can be better stated. There was a time when that was applied to blacks--(Seems like only yesterday, probably to many(?))!

Usually it's called, "Equal Rights," but The Republicans intend a filth campaign--No equal rights for Moslems, Hispanics, the Disabled, Women, Unions and their CBA's--saying that U. S. Civil Rights can only be applied selectively. Not even a recourse to U. S. jurisprudence--the Courts--is proposed.

The more the Clinton email server issue advances, the less likely it becomes a negative for the Democrats. Equal Rights for Women are clearly not supported at GOP, and the pouncing, FOX-Like media. The use of private servers was apparently State Department protocol, and so there may have been a diplomatic intent--continuity of operations, intended.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Senator Sanders intends a Revolution(?), proposing a New Reagan Socialist, giveaway to the already prosperous!"
 
Last edited:
The Governor of Colorado seems to have put it best, quoted in an article on "The Hill."
_______________________________
"Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, a Democratic superdelegate supporting Clinton, also weighed in, saying he thinks Clinton is unfairly criticized based on her gender. He said Clinton made a mistake and it's time to move on."
"'If she were a man, all this stuff wouldn't be at the same level. There's an awful lot of criticism ... over things that really aren't that — I guess a man, it wouldn't be brought up like that," Hickenlooper said on CBS's "Face the Nation.'"

"She's probably the most prepared person to run for high political office in this country in several decades."
__________________________________
The Republicans plan to unleash the Trump filth campaign on the electorate: Trump even plying that some baby genitalia are not equal to other baby genitalia, not allowed active life in the United States. That has long been the GOP brand. Now it can be better stated. There was a time when that was applied to blacks--(Seems like only yesterday, probably to many(?))!

Usually it's called, "Equal Rights," but The Republicans intend a filth campaign--No equal rights for Moslems, Hispanics, the Disabled, Women, Unions and their CBA's--saying that U. S. Civil Rights can only be applied selectively. Not even a recourse to U. S. jurisprudence--the Courts--is proposed.

The more the Clinton email server issue advances, the less likely it becomes a negative for the Democrats. Equal Rights for Women are clearly not supported at GOP, and the pouncing, FOX-Like media. The use of private servers was apparently State Department protocol, and so there may have been a diplomatic intent--continuity of operations, intended.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Senator Sanders intends a Revolution(?), proposing a New Reagan Socialist, giveaway to the already prosperous!"


Barrypuppet hid behind his race....now leftards are claiming that Hitlery is being treated unfairly because she is a woman....wow, never saw THAT one coming.
 
The Governor of Colorado seems to have put it best, quoted in an article on "The Hill."
_______________________________
"Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, a Democratic superdelegate supporting Clinton, also weighed in, saying he thinks Clinton is unfairly criticized based on her gender. He said Clinton made a mistake and it's time to move on."
"'If she were a man, all this stuff wouldn't be at the same level. There's an awful lot of criticism ... over things that really aren't that — I guess a man, it wouldn't be brought up like that," Hickenlooper said on CBS's "Face the Nation.'"

"She's probably the most prepared person to run for high political office in this country in several decades."
__________________________________
The Republicans plan to unleash the Trump filth campaign on the electorate: Trump even plying that some baby genitalia are not equal to other baby genitalia, not allowed active life in the United States. That has long been the GOP brand. Now it can be better stated. There was a time when that was applied to blacks--(Seems like only yesterday, probably to many(?))!

Usually it's called, "Equal Rights," but The Republicans intend a filth campaign--No equal rights for Moslems, Hispanics, the Disabled, Women, Unions and their CBA's--saying that U. S. Civil Rights can only be applied selectively. Not even a recourse to U. S. jurisprudence--the Courts--is proposed.

The more the Clinton email server issue advances, the less likely it becomes a negative for the Democrats. Equal Rights for Women are clearly not supported at GOP, and the pouncing, FOX-Like media. The use of private servers was apparently State Department protocol, and so there may have been a diplomatic intent--continuity of operations, intended.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Senator Sanders intends a Revolution(?), proposing a New Reagan Socialist, giveaway to the already prosperous!"

To me it sounds like a lot of convincing and hopeful thinking.
 
The Governor of Colorado seems to have put it best, quoted in an article on "The Hill."
_______________________________
"Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, a Democratic superdelegate supporting Clinton, also weighed in, saying he thinks Clinton is unfairly criticized based on her gender. He said Clinton made a mistake and it's time to move on."
"'If she were a man, all this stuff wouldn't be at the same level. There's an awful lot of criticism ... over things that really aren't that — I guess a man, it wouldn't be brought up like that," Hickenlooper said on CBS's "Face the Nation.'"

"She's probably the most prepared person to run for high political office in this country in several decades."
__________________________________
The Republicans plan to unleash the Trump filth campaign on the electorate: Trump even plying that some baby genitalia are not equal to other baby genitalia, not allowed active life in the United States. That has long been the GOP brand. Now it can be better stated. There was a time when that was applied to blacks--(Seems like only yesterday, probably to many(?))!

Usually it's called, "Equal Rights," but The Republicans intend a filth campaign--No equal rights for Moslems, Hispanics, the Disabled, Women, Unions and their CBA's--saying that U. S. Civil Rights can only be applied selectively. Not even a recourse to U. S. jurisprudence--the Courts--is proposed.

The more the Clinton email server issue advances, the less likely it becomes a negative for the Democrats. Equal Rights for Women are clearly not supported at GOP, and the pouncing, FOX-Like media. The use of private servers was apparently State Department protocol, and so there may have been a diplomatic intent--continuity of operations, intended.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Senator Sanders intends a Revolution(?), proposing a New Reagan Socialist, giveaway to the already prosperous!"
Republicans engaging in filthy politics? Democrats would never do such a thing!

You're a joke, dude.
 
Welcome everyone to May, Sometimes not even June, in America. The Trump agenda is only slowly becoming known. The Clinton defense of any impropriety only started on the TV sets.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many Republicans even find funny, Destruction of Filthy, Dirty, Hate-America Trump GOP!")
 
Last edited:
  • Justice Dept. Tries to Prevent Deposition of Clinton in Email-Related Suit
    Newsmax ^ | 5/29/16 | Brian Freeman
    0 inShare The Justice Department has filed a court motion to prevent former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton from being ordered to testify in a deposition in a case connected to her use of a private email server, The Hill reports. The Obama administration's move is in response to a deposition request from Judicial Watch, claiming the conservative legal watchdog is trying to expand the scope of the Freedom of Information Act lawsuit related to the preparation of talking points for officials to discuss the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya in which U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other...

  • Huffington Post Removes Article Claiming Hillary Clinton Will be Indicted
    breitbart ^ | 5/29/16 | Patrick Howley
    The liberal publication Huffington Post removed an article on its website Sunday claiming that the FBI plans to pursue an indictment against Hillary Clinton on Federal Racketeering charges

  • Hillary caught lying dead to rights
    Flopping Aces ^ | 05-29-16 | DrJohn
    Oh my. The phrase "dead to rights" has a number of possible origins, my favorite being the George Matsell version: DEAD TO RIGHTS. Positively guilty, and no way of getting clear. You can actually read Matsell's entire book here. Hillary Clinton has been caught lying dead to rights. We've watched for the last couple of years as her email story has come undone piece by piece. Clinton’s stories continue to evolve. In 2007 having a secret email account was “shredding the Constitution.” Back on March 10 of last year, there was no classified information on her server: “I did not...

  • NYT: Clinton Campaign Implodes Against Trump
    Breitbart ^ | May 28, 2016 | Staff
    AMY CHOZICK, ALEXANDER BURNS, and JONATHAN MARTIN write at the NY Times: Democrats could hardly believe their good fortune last month when it became clear that Hillary Clinton was headed to a general election showdown with Donald J. Trump. Mr. Trump carried so much baggage and had insulted so many voting blocs that some Clinton supporters began to imagine a landslide. But early optimism that this would be an easy race is evaporating. In the corridors of Congress, on airplane shuttles between New York and Washington, at donor gatherings and on conference calls, anxiety is spreading through the Democratic Party...
 
Making Even More Fiction Fact(?)--making unverified reports the fact, as though only disreputable sources have access to FBI personnel and data:
___________________________
While Hillary, according to the FBI, is allegedly involved in criminal wrongdoings including money laundering and political bribes, Donald Trump’s candidacy is also fragile, given his alleged links to organized crime as documented by David Cay Johnston:

But Trump was not clean as a whistle. Beginning three years earlier, he’d hired mobbed-up firms to erect Trump Tower and his Trump Plaza apartment building in Manhattan, including buying ostensibly overpriced concrete from a company controlled by mafia chieftains Anthony “Fat Tony” Salerno and Paul Castellano. That story eventually came out in a federal investigation, which also concluded that in a construction industry saturated with mob influence, the Trump Plaza apartment building most likely benefited from connections to racketeering. Trump also failed to disclose that he was under investigation by a grand jury directed by the U.S. attorney in Brooklyn, who wanted to learn how Trump obtained an option to buy the Penn Central railroad yards on the West Side of Manhattan.

Why did Trump get his casino license anyway? Why didn’t investigators look any harder? And how deep did his connections to criminals really go? (Politico, May 22, 2016)

Dirty politics. So much for Democracy and “We the People”. What choice is left?

The Criminalization of politics in America: The leading presidential candidates, Hillary and Donald, have shaky records, with alleged links to criminal wrongdoings.
_______________________________

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Old Strategy from Lands of Many Nations, starting 1492--Let Them All In, and see what happens! All Are Criminal! Send Them All Back!)
 

Forum List

Back
Top