indict them for what? Breaking a rule?
Remember YOU said she committed Espionage, You said she aided and abetted the enemy, YOU claimed she broke National Security rules and put govt workers at risk, you and right wingers claimed a bunch of crapola your right wing media CREATED to make their own news....
And she simply did not comply with one simple rule that other SOS's didn't comply with either....
Deal with it!
Your desperation is duly noted!
All you have seen so far are Crooked Hillary Clinton's misdoings within the State Department and that Hillary Clinton LIED.
The CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION being conducted by the FBI is ongoing. She's in deep hot water and knows she screwed up, and screwed up bad.
From the State Department report, NO ONE approved her use of a private server. The State Department also stated that Hillary Clinton and her staff key staff members REFUSED TO COOPERATE WITH THE STATE DEPARTMENT.
Maybe if you acted like an adult instead of some childish toddler Trump supporter with your "Crooked" Hillary comment, you would be taken more seriously?
All you have seen so far are Crooked Hillary Clinton's misdoings within the State Department and that Hillary Clinton LIED.
Lied about what? What is your comment referring to in this case?
The CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION being conducted by the FBI is ongoing.
The FBI has NEVER stated that this was a Criminal Investigation......so where are you getting this from other than right wing propaganda sites? The FBI has specifically stated on the record that this a security inquiry and specifically said it was not a criminal investigation... All else being talked about is mere speculation, innuendo, lies and propaganda.
From the State Department report, NO ONE approved her use of a private server.
It said basically that they did not find her asking for approval, but also did not say that it was required to get approval....and they noted that emails were sent among state department officials regarding the set up of a private email account.
The only thing that I read which the state department said she personally did that broke their policy, was not turning over printed copies of her government emails upon departure for the govt archives....but noted they did receive them later, 50,000 pages.
She said over a year ago, that she thought that making certain the gvt emails she sent and received were forwarded or cc'd to her Aides on the State.gov email system covered them being on the govt record and eventually archived....but she was wrong....and this is what the State department is admonishing her for....