Climate Scientists’ Road to Hell

[Crick]

Once again, McNutt was addressing politicians concerning debate about policy, not scientists conducting research. That is patently obvious from the context of her words and suggesting otherwise is patently dishonest.

McNutt put an op-ed piece in Science, misusing her position to use the banked authority of that journal to state "the time for debate is over". Anti-science at its worst. Legitimate scientists should be calling for her resignation.

Ian, did you read McNutt's piece? It's not paywalled. She was NOT talking to scientists. She was talking to politicians.

 

[ScienceRocks]

1c of warming by 2100 is most likely...But none the less global warming is real.

 

[IanC]

So, Matthew, a pretty strong warmer, thinks 1C is a reasonable guess. How many of you other warmers still think 2-6C is more likely?

 

[jc456]

So, Matthew, a pretty strong warmer, thinks 1C is a reasonable guess. How many of you other warmers still think 2-6C is more likely?

isn't that what you and I have already stated? 1 degree C for doubling of CO2? So how does he get catastrophe?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Once again, McNutt was addressing politicians concerning debate about policy, not scientists conducting research. That is patently obvious from the context of her words and suggesting otherwise is patently dishonest.

McNutt put an op-ed piece in Science, misusing her position to use the banked authority of that journal to state "the time for debate is over". Anti-science at its worst. Legitimate scientists should be calling for her resignation.

Ian, did you read McNutt's piece? It's not paywalled. She was NOT talking to scientists. She was talking to politicians.

Oh that makes a difference?

You have a new story a day

 

[Muhammed]

"The time for debate has ended."


Now that there is the most sciency statement ever....

 

[skookerasbil]

Make no mistake........a few years ago, Dr Judith Curry was the darling of the climate k00k community. Every single tenured AGW climate crusader in here was posting up her links ALL THE TIME!!!!!

Then, Curry looked at the science and suddenly was off the alarmist bandwagon!!!

So what did every climate change nut do?

They kicked her out!!! "See ya *****!!!"


ghey..............screams "religion".

In this business, one thing will always be static = if you go outside the established narrative, you will be thrown under the bus in an instant!!!


C'mon..............what phoniness!!!

 

[skookerasbil]

Curry doesn't have Miami under water by 2020 so its, "**** YOU!!"


Intellectual dishonesty is ghey

 

[skookerasbil]

New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism - Yahoo News


Global Warming Alarmism When Science IS Fiction - Forbes

The One Minute Case Against Global Warming Alarmism


The mental illness of alarmism climate depression climate change delusion JoNova


MIT professor global warming is a religion The Daily Caller




Is there anything more fun than making the climate alarmists bozo's look like bozo's??



Nope!!!

 

[skookerasbil]

For anybody interested........a very interesting site >>>

Conflicts of interest in climate science Climate Etc.

Of course, the committed climate alarmists loath the site in 2015!!!

 

[ScienceRocks]

I don't think there's a chance in hell that we warm above 1.5c by 2100. .9c is about as much warmer as we have had since 1880...I seriously doubt we do better then 120% of it in 85 years.

We'd have to warm .235c per decade to reach 2c and .35c/decade to reach 3c....This decade isn't going to warm more then .1 to .12c so it will need to warm even faster then that later on!!!

 

[mamooth]

Make no mistake........a few years ago, Dr Judith Curry was the darling of the climate k00k community. Every single tenured AGW climate crusader in here was posting up her links ALL THE TIME!!!

No, nobody was. You're being a lying sack of shit again. As usual. We've been mocking Curry's bad science for a long time.

If you're not lying, show us these examples.

If you are lying, squeal a bit and run, like you always do. You don't have the 'nads to face any of the rational people here, and everyone knows it.

 

[Muhammed]

I don't think there's a chance in hell that we warm above 1.5c by 2100. .9c is about as much warmer as we have had since 1880...I seriously doubt we do better then 120% of it in 85 years.

We'd have to warm .235c per decade to reach 2c and .35c/decade to reach 3c....This decade isn't going to warm more then .1 to .12c so it will need to warm even faster then that later on!!!

The sun doesn't give a **** about what you or the DAGW nutjobs think.