Climate research too "woke" for Trump!

Astrostar

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2017
Messages
3,395
Reaction score
5,215
Points
1,940

Not that Trump or his Republican members give a rats ass, but their efforts to destroy as much of the planet as they can will impact their grand kids much more than themselves. It's just amazing how these morons oppose anything that benefits people, because they consider it backed by Democrats.

History, that they cannot change, will not be kind to these fools!

Bigly!!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Not that Trump or his Republican cult members give a rats ass, but their efforts to destroy as much of the planet as they can will impact their grand kids much more than themselves. It's just amazing how these morons oppose anything that benefits people, because they consider it backed by Democrats.

History, that they cannot change, will not be kind to these fools!

Bigly!!!



So clearly you can answer some basic climate questions for us...


 
Start the Jeopardy! music....
 

Not that Trump or his Republican cult members give a rats ass, but their efforts to destroy as much of the planet as they can will impact their grand kids much more than themselves. It's just amazing how these morons oppose anything that benefits people, because they consider it backed by Democrats.

History, that they cannot change, will not be kind to these fools!

Bigly!!!
if you're concerned about pollution condemn the biggest polluters on the planet .. the lefts dear ally the CCP..
 
Last edited:

Not that Trump or his Republican cult members give a rats ass, but their efforts to destroy as much of the planet as they can will impact their grand kids much more than themselves. It's just amazing how these morons oppose anything that benefits people, because they consider it backed by Democrats.

History, that they cannot change, will not be kind to these fools!

Bigly!!!
Did you even bother to read your own link?

A senior White House official cited two instances of the lab’s “woke direction” that wastes taxpayer funds on what the official called frivolous pursuits and ideologies. One funded an Indigenous and Earth Sciences center that aimed to “make the sciences more welcoming, inclusive, and justice-centered,” while another experiment traced air pollution to “demonize motor vehicles, oil and gas operations.’' The official spoke on condition of anonymity to speak frankly about the administration’s actions.

Your tax dollars hard at woke. :laughing0301:
 

Not that Trump or his Republican cult members give a rats ass, but their efforts to destroy as much of the planet as they can will impact their grand kids much more than themselves. It's just amazing how these morons oppose anything that benefits people, because they consider it backed by Democrats.

History, that they cannot change, will not be kind to these fools!

Bigly!!!
Whoa buddy, no need to blow a gasket. I'm sure your Appalachian ocean front property will pay off any day now, at least according to your woke climate 'scientists'. You'll show us all in the end. Maybe even bigly.
 

Not that Trump or his Republican members give a rats ass, but their efforts to destroy as much of the planet as they can will impact their grand kids much more than themselves. It's just amazing how these morons oppose anything that benefits people, because they consider it backed by Democrats.

History, that they cannot change, will not be kind to these fools!

Bigly!!!

President Trump might just tend to like an ancient Islamic prediction for the "Last Hour" because it could fit with the next phase of "The Abraham Peace Accords?"

"At a symposium of the Union of Geodesy and geophysics, Dr. Pyyotor Shoumsky reported that the south polar ice cap was growing at a minimum rate of 293 cubic miles of ice annually. To put that number in perspective, Lake Erie contains only 109 cubic miles of water. Thus, a volume of ice forms on top of the existing ice at Antarctica each year which is almost three times the volume of water in Lake Erie!" (Expanded Discussion of The HAB Theory, Gershom Gale, Expanded Discussion on the HAB Theory.)

"Let us consider Antarctica for a moment.
We have already seen that it is big. It has a land area of 5.5
million square miles, and is presently covered by something in excess of seven million cubic miles of ice weighing an estimated 19 quadrillion tons (19 followed by 15 zeros). What worries the theorists of earth-crust displacement is that this vast ice-cap is remorselessly increasing in size and weight:'at the rate of 293 cubic miles of ice each year--almost as much as if Lake Ontario were frozen solidly annually and added to it." (Graham Hancock, Fingerprints of the Gods, page 480)


A Carbon Tax will do essentially NOTHING to prevent ocean levels from rising but mega-scale desalination of sea water to produce food even in deserts can alter the formula in many positive ways.


Book 005, Number 2208:
"Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (way peace be upon him) as saying: The Last Hour will not come before wealth becomes abundant and overflowing, so much so that a man takes Zakat out of his property and cannot find anyone to accept it from him and till the land of Arabia becomes meadows and rivers."
SAHIH MUSLIM, BOOK 25: The Book on General Behaviour (Kitab Al-Adab)

A New Mexico biologist and Coach wrote up an interesting theory on this alternative theory on stabilization of the climate.
"So how is our problem of continental drying causing global warming? It all has to do with vegetation and sunlight. When sun light hits a plant, it causes a process which we call photosynthesis where the energy from the sun light creates oxygen for us to breath, water for us to drink, and is stored as sugar for plants and animals to use. When the same sun light hits the soil, all of its energy turns into heat and is radiated back into the atmosphere, carried away by running surface water such as rain fall, is carried away to other areas by our winds, and diffuses down into the soil towards the earth's crust. All of this warms our planet increasing its average temperature.

Therefore, the less vegetation you have on the planet, the more sunlight is being turned into heat and the warmer the planet becomes. This is very critical because warmer and dryer winds dry out other land areas faster decreasing the vegetation on those land areas. Less humidity in the air also reflects less sun light back out into space so that more sun light strikes the earth and more heat is generated.

The truth is that you can do more to decrease global warming by just reducing the average temperature for the Sahara Desert by one or two degrees than if we humans completely quit using fossil fuels and returned to the cave.

So, how would you start working to resolve this problem? Easy, cool the deserts and get some vegetation growing on them as soon as possible. But the method is much more complex than that. You have to use the prevailing trade winds in relation to the deserts to get the best results as quickly as possible and it will be extremely expensive.

Then we build desalination plants along the coast near these water sheds and pipe water to the tops or ridges of the water sheds

This will do a number of things. First, it will increase the moisture in the desert soil so that it will develop water tables and water will begin to run in the streams. This water will increase the amount of vegetation in the area and decrease the amount of heat being generated by sun light cooling the watered area and all areas down wind of the watered area. As more available water evaporates, it will cool the air and reflect more sun light back out into space cooling the area even more. Cooler and more humid air will have less of a heating effect on areas down wind and will reflect more sun light back into space in those areas cooling areas we won't be watering yet. Cooler and more humid air will also have less of a warming effect on our seas and oceans.

Rain water running off of cooler soil will decrease the heating effect on our oceans and our planet crusts which will decrease catastrophic storm activities for other areas and seismic activity for the entire planet. Also, returning more ocean water to the surface and aquifers of our continents will lower the sea levels providing more usable land for us to farm and build on.

With cooler desert areas and increasing vegetation, less water will evaporate from our deserts increasing the amount of surface water even more and increasing the amount of vegetation and animal life by huge amounts because deserts currently take up more than 20% of our land surface. Populations will be able to spread out and there will be less competition for existing land areas.

This strategy has to be done in steps with the first step being to begin slowing the rate at which our global warming is increasing. We need to focus on that until we have brought it to a point to where the temperature is not increasing any more and is reasonably stable. While we are doing this, we need to come to a global consensus of just how cool we want to cool our planet down to. If we cool it down too much, we will begin to have devastatingly harsh winters in large populated areas and even cause an ice age to set in.

Then we begin cooling the planet down to a point which will be most beneficial for all countries or the planet as a whole. We need to gradually bring the temperature down because there may be a lag effect in which the planet will continue cooling after we stop increasing our efforts to cool it off more. We may even want to stop cooling the planet once or twice before we reach our targeted temperatures to see if there is a lag effect


We need to start working on this as soon as possible because, if the planet reaches a point to where it is warming faster than our technology can possibly stop or reverse this warming trend, then our planet is lost and all life will cease to exist on this planet within a relatively short period of time. We will need to start with the largest and hottest deserts because cooling them will have the greatest benefit in the least time. (Global Warming II by biologist Carl Cantrell).




 
Man made climate change watermelons are green on the outside and red on the inside.
Climate change is a trillion dollar grift.
Climate Change fear is a tool used to control the dumb left wing voters.

1766108289665.webp
 

Not that Trump or his Republican members give a rats ass, but their efforts to destroy as much of the planet as they can will impact their grand kids much more than themselves. It's just amazing how these morons oppose anything that benefits people, because they consider it backed by Democrats.

History, that they cannot change, will not be kind to these fools!

Bigly!!!

How many of the climate geniuses predictions came true over the past forty years?
Zero.
 
The earth is 4.5 Billion years old…. It’s changing. What really needs to change is the bullshit notion that the US at best is 500 years old is responsible and now it is a taxable event?
 

Not that Trump or his Republican members give a rats ass, but their efforts to destroy as much of the planet as they can will impact their grand kids much more than themselves. It's just amazing how these morons oppose anything that benefits people, because they consider it backed by Democrats.

History, that they cannot change, will not be kind to these fools!

Bigly!!!
Climate research is a hoax and a scam.
 

Not that Trump or his Republican members give a rats ass, but their efforts to destroy as much of the planet as they can will impact their grand kids much more than themselves. It's just amazing how these morons oppose anything that benefits people, because they consider it backed by Democrats.

History, that they cannot change, will not be kind to these fools!

Bigly!!!
^^^ Believes the ice caps melted in 2013
 
Not that Trump or his Republican members give a rats ass, but their efforts to destroy as much of the planet as they can will impact their grand kids much more than themselves. It's just amazing how these morons oppose anything that benefits people, because they consider it backed by Democrats
It is amazing how stupid you are.

The solution to global warming, manufacturing wind turbines and solar panels to cover abd destroy 10,000's of square miles of farms, wildlife habitat, nature you ignore.

The fact that solar and wind farms require millions of tons of oil and coal, forever you are too stupid to research.

Industry endlessly manufacturing is what you want, pure stupidity
 
15th post
So clearly you can answer some basic climate questions for us...


If I might ask, why don't you take those questions to science based forums?

Have you actually honestly researched each of the points you suggested here? Becuase it's very easy to find the answers to them online?

Every one of these questions has been answered in the peer-reviewed literature for decades.

Here is a quick link to Grok AI's response to them. Remember, Grok AI is Elon Musk's AI, so I don't want to hear anything about how they programmed it to be pro democrats:

 
Man made climate change watermelons are green on the outside and red on the inside.
Climate change is a trillion dollar grift.
Climate Change fear is a tool used to control the dumb left wing voters.

View attachment 1195307
So you think that world wide, people that enter the field of climate science are just corrupted, like that?

Do you even realize that not all countries even pay that well for these scientific fields? But yet, they are all just going along with it anyway?

Often, climate scientists could use their skills (beause the things that they learn in education are transferrable to other fields) to be paid more in other fields, but they choose this specific field for the love of science? But yet, you think that they've actually been able to co-ordinate a world wide scientific consensus that is fraudelent despite this? You think that despite being able to earn more in other fields, they are choosing to earn less in this field, but then also co-ordinate globally to lie about it?

And that it's just chance, that the vast majority of anthropogenic climate change denying scientists are funded by oil companies?

Give me your best climate denying scientists that you like to reference.
 
Back
Top Bottom