gslack
Senior Member
- Mar 26, 2010
- 4,527
- 356
- 48
G, whatever it is you have between your ears, it ain't workin', boy.
Note that people are posting information from scientific articles. And all that you are doing is displaying the depths of your ignorance.
Yes, BLAH BLAH, science BLAH BLAH, end of the world, BLAH BLAH , MY fault blah blah......
Its okay man I get it. If they turn acidic its AGW, if they don't its AGW, yep just like it went from warming to clmate change when the temps went and cooled for a bit... LOL you people crack me up man..
Where did you pick up that piece of BS(inbold)? Got a cite for that? I'm not impressed with your analyses of the situation, since they're obviously political, given that no proponent of AGW would ever say something that stupid. That's just an indication that we either have rampant ignorance on the skeptic/denier side or some just don't care what they say, as long as it fits their political bias.
Cornhole, are you trying to claim that the scientists did not claim the CO2 was turning the oceans more acidic? Or are you claiming they didn't just say that climate change was reducing the oceans uptake of CO2 which would of course mean the oceans are not going to become acidic due to climate change.
Look retard your ignorance and inability to follow a thread or conversations and reply to them anyway has become tiresome to the point no one wants to acknowledge you on here. Why would they? They afraid they agree with you and you will say something completely ignorant again... Do yourself a favor and learn to focus and pay attention.