Climate Activists Seek to Save the Planet by Cutting, Burying Trees

[Weatherman2020]

Leftards once again making the Babylon Bee look like a legitimate news organization.

Through his foundation Breakthrough Energy Ventures, Mr. Gates is a part of the $6.6 million seed investor pool backing Kodama Systems in its proposal to remove trees in California's fire-challenged woodlands and bury them in Nevada to sequester carbon dioxide (CO2).

"We must dramatically accelerate forest thinning treatments," the Boston-based firm says on its website. Kodama calls itself a "technology-driven forest restoration service."

Climate Activists Seek to Save the Planet by Cutting, Burying Trees

While Bill Gates invests in a plan to thin out forests and bury the trees to sequester carbon, one ecologist calls it a ‘spectacularly bad idea.’

www.theepochtimes.com

Technology driven!
So is a coal fired steam train.

So Envirowhackos, where’s the data that if we cut down CO2 eating trees and feed them to worms (who turn it into CO2) we save the world?

 

[The Duke]

Leftards once again making the Babylon Bee look like a legitimate news organization.

Through his foundation Breakthrough Energy Ventures, Mr. Gates is a part of the $6.6 million seed investor pool backing Kodama Systems in its proposal to remove trees in California's fire-challenged woodlands and bury them in Nevada to sequester carbon dioxide (CO2).

"We must dramatically accelerate forest thinning treatments," the Boston-based firm says on its website. Kodama calls itself a "technology-driven forest restoration service."

Climate Activists Seek to Save the Planet by Cutting, Burying Trees

While Bill Gates invests in a plan to thin out forests and bury the trees to sequester carbon, one ecologist calls it a ‘spectacularly bad idea.’

www.theepochtimes.com

Technology driven!
So is a coal fired steam train.

So Envirowhackos, where’s the data that if we cut down CO2 eating trees and feed them to worms (who turn it into CO2) we save the world?

It's like "The Emporer has no clothes".

 

[martybegan]

Leftards once again making the Babylon Bee look like a legitimate news organization.

Through his foundation Breakthrough Energy Ventures, Mr. Gates is a part of the $6.6 million seed investor pool backing Kodama Systems in its proposal to remove trees in California's fire-challenged woodlands and bury them in Nevada to sequester carbon dioxide (CO2).

"We must dramatically accelerate forest thinning treatments," the Boston-based firm says on its website. Kodama calls itself a "technology-driven forest restoration service."

Climate Activists Seek to Save the Planet by Cutting, Burying Trees

While Bill Gates invests in a plan to thin out forests and bury the trees to sequester carbon, one ecologist calls it a ‘spectacularly bad idea.’

www.theepochtimes.com

Technology driven!
So is a coal fired steam train.

So Envirowhackos, where’s the data that if we cut down CO2 eating trees and feed them to worms (who turn it into CO2) we save the world?

I think the purpose is to sequester short cycle carbon and transform it into long cycle carbon.

It's the long cycle carbon the actual proponents of Climate Change believe causes the problem. It's the less informed of the nutters that can't tell the difference between the two.

 

[Anomalism]

Curious...

What would the right wing approach to the climate be? Just do nothing? Buy a new diesel truck to piss off the libs?

 

[martybegan]

Curious...

What would the right wing approach to the climate be? Just do nothing? Buy a new diesel truck to piss off the libs?

Adapt to the changes, just like humans have done for millennia.

We have the advantage of technology at this point as well.

 

[Anomalism]

We have the advantage of technology at this point as well.

Right wingers don't seem particularly interested in the advancement of technology that could help.

 

[martybegan]

Right wingers don't seem particularly interested in the advancement of technology that could help.

How so?

Are you talking about actual technology or advances like improvements in fake vaginas for he/shes?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Curious...

What would the right wing approach to the climate be? Just do nothing? Buy a new diesel truck to piss off the libs?

Used to be a pristine ice pack until the climate drastically changed 9,000 years ago and nobody acted.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Right wingers don't seem particularly interested in the advancement of technology that could help.

I too believe trees should all be eliminated.

 

[Anomalism]

How so?

Are you talking about actual technology or advances like improvements in fake vaginas for he/shes?

Well, in every discussion about the unbelievable progress being made with solar they're typically negative and spiteful as far as I can tell.

Sort of seems like they just want everything the left cares about to fail, and that it's not any deeper than that.

 

[Anomalism]

Used to be a pristine ice pack until the climate drastically changed 9,000 years ago and nobody acted.

View attachment 845305

That's about the non-answer I expected from a poster of your caliber.

 

[ReinyDays]

Burying trees during a housing shortage ... good for landlords ... and who cares about tenants eh? ...

 

[martybegan]

Well, in every discussion about the unbelievable progress being made with solar they're typically negative and spiteful as far as I can tell.

Sort of seems like they just want everything the left cares about to fail, and that it's not any deeper than that.

It still doesn't work at night, or when cloudy, or very well in high latitudes where the sun angle isn't optimal.

The spite is over being forced to use it when it isn't a proper base grid load substitute for fossil fuel power, only nuclear is.

The issue on the right on renewables isn't the technology, is that the technology is being sold as more advanced that it is, more reliable than it is, and being sold as a viable base load replacement.

 

[Woodznutz]

Sounds like a fossil fuel intensive venture, all them chainsaws and other gasoline or diesel-powered logging, hauling, and road building equipment. Not to mention the daily trips to distant worksites of hundreds of workers in their gas-guzzling pickup trucks.

 

[Weatherman2020]

That's about the non-answer I expected from a poster of your caliber.

You think you need to act because some idiots who live in 12,000 sq ft mansions on the beach and fly private jets tells you to.

Try educating yourself instead of being a mindless useful idiot.

 

[Anomalism]

It still doesn't work at night, or when cloudy, or very well in high latitudes where the sun angle isn't optimal.

The spite is over being forced to use it when it isn't a proper base grid load substitute for fossil fuel power, only nuclear is.

The issue on the right on renewables isn't the technology, is that the technology is being sold as more advanced that it is, more reliable than it is, and being sold as a viable base load replacement.

Yes, clearly it's not where it needs to be yet. It's improving fast though, and it's worse than pulling teeth to get right wingers to have an honest conversation.

 

[Anomalism]

You think you need to act because some idiots who live in 12,000 sq ft mansions on the beach and fly private jets tells you to.

Try educating yourself instead of being a mindless useful idiot.

Your arrogance is so massive that you just assume you know everything about everything.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Yes, clearly it's not where it needs to be yet. It's improving fast though, and it's worse than pulling teeth to get right wingers to have an honest conversation.

Like I said. Show the data that carbon eating trees need to be cut down.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Your arrogance is so massive that you just assume you know everything about everything.

 

[martybegan]

Yes, clearly it's not where it needs to be yet. It's improving fast though, and it's worse than pulling teeth to get right wingers to have an honest conversation.

Yet it's being forced on people before it's ready. Just like the whole 2035 ban on ICE vehicles.

If EVs are so much better, why the government force?