Classified documents discovered at Mike Pence’s home in Indiana

That article was 2 years ago!!! It's been debunked! The Department of Energy and the FBI now are saying it's bull crap! It's old misinformation to cover Fauci and his gang of Nazis. That includes Biden and all the politicians who destroyed lives and families by their stupid shutdowns.

Uh, wait... um, wasn't Trump in charge when Covid hit?
And when the shutdowns happened?

When the FBI and DOE come back to me with actual EVIDENCE it came from a lab, and not their 'guesses', you can get back to me.
 
Uh, wait... um, wasn't Trump in charge when Covid hit?
And when the shutdowns happened?

When the FBI and DOE come back to me with actual EVIDENCE it came from a lab, and not their 'guesses', you can get back to me.
And, you can come back to the sane people of America when you have any EVIDENCE Covid19 came from people eating bats. January 2018 we knew what they were doing in Whuan Labs. The facts are not on your side. And, February of 2021 is when Biden was President when the article was written with just no evidence at all. We know what that laboratory was doing and so it logically follows where the genetically altered Covid virus came from.
 
And, you can come back to the sane people of America when you have any EVIDENCE Covid19 came from people eating bats.
Except it was already proven the virus came from bats. It's how it got from bat to human that's the question.

We know what that laboratory was doing and so it logically follows where the genetically altered Covid virus came from.
We know what was going on at a top secret Chinese lab? Do tell!
 
Except it was already proven the virus came from bats. It's how it got from bat to human that's the question.


We know what was going on at a top secret Chinese lab? Do tell!
No it has not! You prove this! Go ahead. Prove it. As far as that lab and others Fauci's money was using, it's called gain of function labs. That particular lab was known to be poorly run with accidents happening. No, there was no natural mutation of a bat virus to humans. Didn't happen. Been proven not to have happen. TUCKER CARLSON: Why did people 'lie about the truth' of COVID's origins?
The women was there at the lab. She knows. Interesting that she doesn't think the leak was intentional but China allowed infected people to go to the Western World before the pandemic was really known and understood. Now, whether they were studying the virus in a bat or not isn't saying that it transmitted to humans naturally by eating a bat. That didn't happen. No proof. It came from that lab. Fauci was pouring money into the lab prior to this. Obama even tried to shut down this sort of study because it's so dangerous. But, Fauci went behind his back and did it anyway over in Whuan.
 
No it has not! You prove this! Go ahead. Prove it.

No, guy, it's not on me to prove it came from a bat (which is indisputable), it's on you guys to prove that between the bat and the first person who caught it at a wet market, that the virus was at that lab. There's no actual evidence of that, just supposition.

Here's the one thing I've learned from a year of dating a Chinese woman. The Chinese will literally eat anything if you put enough spices on it. So I have no problem believing someone killed some bats, sold them at a wet market, and that's how we got Covid into the human population. It certainly makes more sense than despite all the procedures you have at a lab, that a virus got out, and that virologist spread it at a wet market instead of a soccer game.
 
No, guy, it's not on me to prove it came from a bat (which is indisputable), it's on you guys to prove that between the bat and the first person who caught it at a wet market, that the virus was at that lab. There's no actual evidence of that, just supposition.

Here's the one thing I've learned from a year of dating a Chinese woman. The Chinese will literally eat anything if you put enough spices on it. So I have no problem believing someone killed some bats, sold them at a wet market, and that's how we got Covid into the human population. It certainly makes more sense than despite all the procedures you have at a lab, that a virus got out, and that virologist spread it at a wet market instead of a soccer game.
The FBI believes there is enough evidence. So does the Department of Energy. There's no evidence that someone eating a bat caught Covid19. Gain of function research makes a non-transmittible virus transmittible. So that they can study for vaccines. The former scientist working there has blown the whistle on this that it leaked from the lab. Was it intentional? Probably not. But, because of poor protocols at the lab, funded by Fauci, it got out and China did nothing to stop it from spreading. Instead, they lied and now Biden is giving them our oil reserves. Can you say, Hunter Biden and his dad are rats! Traitors!
 
Let's take your crazy apart, shall we?

The FBI believes there is enough evidence. So does the Department of Energy.

That's nice. Where's their evidence?

There's no evidence that someone eating a bat caught Covid19.


Abstract​

Understanding how severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in 2019 is critical to preventing future zoonotic outbreaks before they become the next pandemic. The Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan, China, was identified as a likely source of cases in early reports, but later this conclusion became controversial. We show here that the earliest known COVID-19 cases from December 2019, including those without reported direct links, were geographically centered on this market. We report that live SARS-CoV-2–susceptible mammals were sold at the market in late 2019 and that within the market, SARS-CoV-2–positive environmental samples were spatially associated with vendors selling live mammals. Although there is insufficient evidence to define upstream events, and exact circumstances remain obscure, our analyses indicate that the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 occurred through the live wildlife trade in China and show that the Huanan market was the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The former scientist working there has blown the whistle on this that it leaked from the lab.
Which former scientist was that?

Instead, they lied and now Biden is giving them our oil reserves.

Wow, you are a ball of crazy and you don't get how commodity markets work, do you?
 
Let's take your crazy apart, shall we?



That's nice. Where's their evidence?




Abstract​

Understanding how severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in 2019 is critical to preventing future zoonotic outbreaks before they become the next pandemic. The Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan, China, was identified as a likely source of cases in early reports, but later this conclusion became controversial. We show here that the earliest known COVID-19 cases from December 2019, including those without reported direct links, were geographically centered on this market. We report that live SARS-CoV-2–susceptible mammals were sold at the market in late 2019 and that within the market, SARS-CoV-2–positive environmental samples were spatially associated with vendors selling live mammals. Although there is insufficient evidence to define upstream events, and exact circumstances remain obscure, our analyses indicate that the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 occurred through the live wildlife trade in China and show that the Huanan market was the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic.


Which former scientist was that?



Wow, you are a ball of crazy and you don't get how commodity markets work, do you?
Here's a heads up. The Senate has just approve releasing everything on the Corona Virus. Everything! No more hiding! Using old articles written by leftwing China supporters won't work anymore. If you watched the video you would know: The CCP underestimated the transmissibility of COVID-19: Dr. Li Meng Yan | Fox News Video

 
Here's a heads up. The Senate has just approve releasing everything on the Corona Virus. Everything! No more hiding! Using old articles written by leftwing China supporters won't work anymore. If you watched the video you would know: The CCP underestimated the transmissibility of COVID-19: Dr. Li Meng Yan | Fox News Video

So these morons don't understand how international commodity markets work, either?

Ah.... Yan Li-Meng.


Li-Meng Yan or Yan Limeng (simplified Chinese: 闫丽梦; traditional Chinese: 閆麗夢) is a Chinese virologist,[3] known for her publications and interviews alleging that SARS-CoV-2 was made in a Chinese government laboratory. Her publications have been widely dismissed as flawed by the scientific community.[4][5][6][7]

Yan stated that evidence of genetic engineering was censored in scientific journals, allegedly as part of a conspiracy to suppress information on the topic.[9][19] However, other scientists disputed the validity of the papers, pointing to poor methods, undisclosed funding from politically-motivated sources, the use of pseudonyms for the papers' co-authors, and the papers having never been submitted to a journal for review.[20][21][7][4] The papers were described by virologists as "non-scientific,"[22] "junk science," and written to spread "political propaganda."[21]

Given the far-reaching implications of the "Yan Report," RR:C19 sought out peer reviews from world-renowned experts in virology, molecular biology, structural biology, computational biology, vaccine development, and medicine. Collectively, reviewers have debunked the authors' claims that: (1) bat coronaviruses ZC45 or ZXC21 were used as a background strain to engineer SARS-CoV-2, (2) the presence of restriction sites flanking the RBD suggest prior screening for a virus targeting the human ACE2 receptor, and (3) the furin-like cleavage site is unnatural and provides evidence of engineering. In all three cases, the reviewers provide counter-arguments based on peer-reviewed literature and long-established foundational knowledge that directly refute the claims put forth by Yan et al. There was a general consensus that the study's claims were better explained by potential political motivations rather than scientific integrity. The peer reviewers arrived at these common opinions independently, further strengthening the credibility of the peer reviews.[5]


Seriously, this is the best you got?
 
So these morons don't understand how international commodity markets work, either?

Ah.... Yan Li-Meng.


Li-Meng Yan or Yan Limeng (simplified Chinese: 闫丽梦; traditional Chinese: 閆麗夢) is a Chinese virologist,[3] known for her publications and interviews alleging that SARS-CoV-2 was made in a Chinese government laboratory. Her publications have been widely dismissed as flawed by the scientific community.[4][5][6][7]

Yan stated that evidence of genetic engineering was censored in scientific journals, allegedly as part of a conspiracy to suppress information on the topic.[9][19] However, other scientists disputed the validity of the papers, pointing to poor methods, undisclosed funding from politically-motivated sources, the use of pseudonyms for the papers' co-authors, and the papers having never been submitted to a journal for review.[20][21][7][4] The papers were described by virologists as "non-scientific,"[22] "junk science," and written to spread "political propaganda."[21]

Given the far-reaching implications of the "Yan Report," RR:C19 sought out peer reviews from world-renowned experts in virology, molecular biology, structural biology, computational biology, vaccine development, and medicine. Collectively, reviewers have debunked the authors' claims that: (1) bat coronaviruses ZC45 or ZXC21 were used as a background strain to engineer SARS-CoV-2, (2) the presence of restriction sites flanking the RBD suggest prior screening for a virus targeting the human ACE2 receptor, and (3) the furin-like cleavage site is unnatural and provides evidence of engineering. In all three cases, the reviewers provide counter-arguments based on peer-reviewed literature and long-established foundational knowledge that directly refute the claims put forth by Yan et al. There was a general consensus that the study's claims were better explained by potential political motivations rather than scientific integrity. The peer reviewers arrived at these common opinions independently, further strengthening the credibility of the peer reviews.[5]


Seriously, this is the best you got?
More and more are coming out every day stating the same thing. The virus was genetically altered and it got out. On purpose? Hopefully not. But, when it did get out, China did nothing to warn the world until it was too late. It did not happen because someone ate a bat and got Covid19. The reason why it is known to be genetically altered is because of how it attaches to humans and causes the deadly pneumonia.
 
More and more are coming out every day stating the same thing. The virus was genetically altered and it got out.

More and more of the right wing echo chamber repeating the same garbage.
China gave us a clear warning as early as November 2019. That's why it's called... Covid-19. It was identified in 2019.

The Chinese gave the world plenty of warning. Trump sat on his hands and was more interested in doing Trump stuff. He held rallies, he called it a "hoax", he told people it would clear up by Easter, he downplayed the seriousness to avoid spooking the markets.




It did not happen because someone ate a bat and got Covid19.
That is EXACTLY How it happened.

The reason why it is known to be genetically altered is because of how it attaches to humans and causes the deadly pneumonia.
But there would be evidence of that through molecular analysis.


Considering the previous pandemic, it can be inferred that COVID-19 is most probably a disease due to zoonotic transmission. This is supported by studies showing that SARS coronavirus originates from direct contact between humans and civets. Another novel coronavirus, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), has also been discovered because of its direct transmission to humans from dromedary camels [6]. Retrospective analysis of a few early confirmed cases in Wuhan last year shows that this contagious disease is transmitted through direct person-to-person contact. According to the scientific evidence available, bats are inferred to be the host animals responsible for starting the transmission chain of this virus. Up to 96% similarity was found between SARS-COV-2 and the bat coronavirus using whole-genome analysis

In conclusion, all these specific features observed in SARS-COV-2 helps scientists to rule out the idea that this pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus is the result of a man-made action that could be either engineered in the laboratory or further created as a bioweapon out of conspiracy. Recent discoveries revealed evidence of the presence of the virus around the world before it emerged in Asia. There is growing evidence of its true origin as a global organism that was waiting for favorable conditions to emerge instead of originating in China. Recent testing of sewage in Barcelona had suggested that the virus may have been present in the Spanish city in March 2019, many months before China identified the pathogen in the city of Wuhan in December 2019. Based on the results available, it is most probably that this is a natural-born virus that emerged from an animal host, most likely a bat, without any direct pieces of evidence about its intermediate host.
 

Forum List

Back
Top