What 'deflection', snowflake? The thread is about the Russia-US Uranium deal, SECRETARY OF STATE Hillary's influence, and the subsequent donation by the key, prominent RUSSIAN involved in the deal...
William Howard Taft.
What 'deflection', snowflake? The thread is about the Russia-US Uranium deal, SECRETARY OF STATE Hillary's influence, and the subsequent donation by the key, prominent RUSSIAN involved in the deal...
Keep up, snowflake, and / or stop making false accusations...
Oh wait, I forgot - that's all you snowflakes do.
...and the compensation she received for influence in trying to make the deal happen. Dude, the day after the election, there were a LOT of pi$$ed off Clinton Foundation donors, to include the Russians, who had spent a LOT of money for favors and influence they realized they would NEVER receive due to Hillary's loss.
...and under continued investigation by the FBI...
...and under continued investigation by the FBI...
Morons like Queasy DEMAND "proof' on Trump's collusion with Russia, etc.......but then, relies on "rumors' regarding Hillary Clinton's "lock her up" mantra.....
Hypocritical bastard.......LOL
...and the compensation she received for influence in trying to make the deal happen. Dude, the day after the election, there were a LOT of pi$$ed off Clinton Foundation donors, to include the Russians, who had spent a LOT of money for favors and influence they realized they would NEVER receive due to Hillary's loss.
...and under continued investigation by the FBI...
Morons like Queasy DEMAND "proof' on Trump's collusion with Russia, etc.......but then, relies on "rumors' regarding Hillary Clinton's "lock her up" mantra.....
Hypocritical bastard.......LOL
Doesn't ALL extraordinary accusations require proof? In the Trump Administration's case, ALL THERE IS is rumors and a few likely coincidences that by themselves lead nowhere, yet have lead to calls for impeachment and treason before any investigation has even begun, while in the CLINTON case, as detailed above, there is a long chain of circumstantial evidence the combination of which is not only remarkable in its coincidence but highly suspicious, truly demanding a closer look at, YET NO INVESTIGATION HAS EVER BEEN DONE.
So let's assume that everything you said is right and NO special export licenses were EVER given to any overseas companies anywhere, what you are saying is that you are OK with Russia making money, a nice thick profit off of our own uranium?
Maybe THAT is what Obama meant when he said he could be more flexible? A number of investors in Uranium One gave donations to the Clinton Foundation during the time the sale was being considered (between 2008 and 2010), in part through the participation of Frank Giustra, a Canadian mining magnate who was a large donor to the Clinton Foundation and who had controlled a company that eventually bought Uranium One.
In addition, Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 in 2010 to give a speech to a Russian bank with ties to the Russian government. The U.S. government eventually approved the deal in 2010.
The reason this is a story is the potential that there was some quid pro quo involved: that in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation and/or the speech Bill Clinton gave in Russia, Hillary Clinton used her position as Secretary of State to make approval of this sale happen. It need not be explicit, but at the very least there has to be a connection between donations and official actions that Clinton took. The only evidence for now is timing: people who would benefit from the sale made donations to the Clinton Foundation at around the same time the matter was before the government.
Even if Clinton had wanted to make sure the sale was approved, it wouldn't have been possible for her to do it on her own. CFIUS is made up of not only the Secretary of State, but also the secretaries of Treasury, Justice, Homeland Security, Commerce, Defense, and Energy, as well as the heads of the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and the Office of Science and Technology Policy.
ALL OF THESE PEOPLE were part of the Obama Administration under the direct control and influence of Barack Obama. An amazing number of coincidences that all worked in the favor of both the Clintons as well as Vladimir Putin; BOTH were much better off after than they were before, BUT I'M SURE it was all just good business!
IF WE TOOK THE CLINTONS OUT OF THIS STORY AND REPLACED THEM WITH THE TRUMP FAMILY, there would be pandemonium in the streets, riots in Congress, calls for impeachment with Maxine Waters jumping out of her skin decrying TREASON!!!!
Oh, wait----- they are already doing that with no actions or evidence found. IN FACT, THE BEST EVIDENCE THE DNC HAS FOUND TO DATE is that the Trump Administration and GOP have agreed to have a Special Counsel to LOOK FOR EVIDENCE!!!
Conversely, while pummeling the Trumps with heinous accusations with nothing to even back them up, the Left looks for every convenience and excuse imaginable to utterly dismiss any suspicions against both Barack Obama and The Clintons with nary a second look. That is why no one takes the Left very serious at all. They see spiders under everyone's bed, EXCEPT THEIR OWN.
Nothing like a feeble minded Trumpette insulting someone's intelligence.
Why? To shut up you dumbass Trumpettes who keep lying about it.
So let's assume that everything you said is right and NO special export licenses were EVER given to any overseas companies anywhere, what you are saying is that you are OK with Russia making money, a nice thick profit off of our own uranium?
Maybe THAT is what Obama meant when he said he could be more flexible? A number of investors in Uranium One gave donations to the Clinton Foundation during the time the sale was being considered (between 2008 and 2010), in part through the participation of Frank Giustra, a Canadian mining magnate who was a large donor to the Clinton Foundation and who had controlled a company that eventually bought Uranium One.
In addition, Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 in 2010 to give a speech to a Russian bank with ties to the Russian government. The U.S. government eventually approved the deal in 2010.
The reason this is a story is the potential that there was some quid pro quo involved: that in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation and/or the speech Bill Clinton gave in Russia, Hillary Clinton used her position as Secretary of State to make approval of this sale happen. It need not be explicit, but at the very least there has to be a connection between donations and official actions that Clinton took. The only evidence for now is timing: people who would benefit from the sale made donations to the Clinton Foundation at around the same time the matter was before the government.
Even if Clinton had wanted to make sure the sale was approved, it wouldn't have been possible for her to do it on her own. CFIUS is made up of not only the Secretary of State, but also the secretaries of Treasury, Justice, Homeland Security, Commerce, Defense, and Energy, as well as the heads of the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and the Office of Science and Technology Policy.
ALL OF THESE PEOPLE were part of the Obama Administration under the direct control and influence of Barack Obama. An amazing number of coincidences that all worked in the favor of both the Clintons as well as Vladimir Putin; BOTH were much better off after than they were before, BUT I'M SURE it was all just good business!
IF WE TOOK THE CLINTONS OUT OF THIS STORY AND REPLACED THEM WITH THE TRUMP FAMILY, there would be pandemonium in the streets, riots in Congress, calls for impeachment with Maxine Waters jumping out of her skin decrying TREASON!!!!
Oh, wait----- they are already doing that with no actions or evidence found. IN FACT, THE BEST EVIDENCE THE DNC HAS FOUND TO DATE is that the Trump Administration and GOP have agreed to have a Special Counsel to LOOK FOR EVIDENCE!!!
Conversely, while pummeling the Trumps with heinous accusations with nothing to even back them up, the Left looks for every convenience and excuse imaginable to utterly dismiss any suspicions against both Barack Obama and The Clintons with nary a second look. That is why no one takes the Left very serious at all. They see spiders under everyone's bed, EXCEPT THEIR OWN.
why not the Russians earning a profit? It was Canadian owned before that, who earned the profit...
