Clarifying Clinton's "giving Russia 20% of US uranium"....

Roosky deflection.
What 'deflection', snowflake? The thread is about the Russia-US Uranium deal, SECRETARY OF STATE Hillary's influence, and the subsequent donation by the key, prominent RUSSIAN involved in the deal...

Keep up, snowflake, and / or stop making false accusations...

Oh wait, I forgot - that's all you snowflakes do. :p
 
The truth is not something that concerns Republicans.

The truth is the ONLY thing that concerns Republicans, and so far Democrats have offered nothing but false accusations, fake Russia-Propaganda-filled reports, and evidence of their own crimes.
 
She was a participant, and if not a participant demonstrated pure incompetence. You can read right? This story and the BS who spread it pretend she wasn't a player, but she was. The Clinton Foundation also received money from some of the investors. Weird right? Additionally, Obama allowed the transaction. All this clearly shows the Clintons and Obama's were in the mix with the Russians on the subject of URANIUM, yet Trump is the fucking traitor. I mean shit, Trump Jr. met with a dirty Russian on the subject of dirty Clinton but not. Liberals are so so rational.

The OP is rich, appreciate the laugh.

The facts behind Trump’s repeated claim about Hillary Clinton’s role in the Russian uranium deal

And to back up your claim you use a link that calls Trump a liar and finds no link between Mrs. Clinton and the sale? Ok.
That's pretty much the point. That WaPo article tells you all the connections, and then right afterword, says, (I'll paraphrase here to make it clear for you since you didn't get it the first time,) . . . . "but but but, they weren't actually talking about money or Uranium, only low level bureaucrats were involved in the deal and folks higher up had nothing to do with it, there was no Quid Pro Quo. . . yeah, that's the ticket, you'll just have to trust us.

So. . . um, our judgement on this is that Trump is a liar."

Why do you let the elite media do all your thinking for you? Are you seriously this stupid?

Trump is a liar because he's been caught lying over and over again. So, what does 'the dude' say? He posts an article that calls out Trump's lies and claims it's proof of something other than Trump is a liar.
 
Roosky deflection.
What 'deflection', snowflake? The thread is about the Russia-US Uranium deal, SECRETARY OF STATE Hillary's influence, and the subsequent donation by the key, prominent RUSSIAN involved in the deal...

Keep up, snowflake, and / or stop making false accusations...

Oh wait, I forgot - that's all you snowflakes do. :p

Nope the the thread is about the lie that Sec. Clinton gave away 20% of our uranium to Russia. Without that piece the whole play for pay is moot as they got no US Uranium from that deal.
 
Nope the the thread is about the lie that Sec. Clinton gave away 20% of our uranium to Russia
...and the compensation she received for influence in trying to make the deal happen. Dude, the day after the election, there were a LOT of pi$$ed off Clinton Foundation donors, to include the Russians, who had spent a LOT of money for favors and influence they realized they would NEVER receive due to Hillary's loss. :p
 
Every once in a while, right wingers bring up this moronic allegation spurred on by Trump and right wing outlets, about Clinton "giving' Russia "our uranium" in exchange for millions of rubles.....

The allegation is not only annoying and stupid, but it also shows how truly ignorant those people who make the allegation may be........Let this story die.....please.

Russian to Judgment
Allegations of a "quid pro quo" deal giving Russia ownership of one-fifth of U.S. uranium deposits in exchange for $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation are unsubstantiated.

FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?


So, in reading the Snopes article, the salient points were:

1). President Obama approved the sale of the Uranium.
2). Secretary Clinton approved the uranium sale.
3). Little was known of the Clinton Foundation.
4). The Clinton Foundation deserved all the scrutiny it could get.

Now let me ask:

Had President Trump and Secretary Tillerson been involved in approving the sale of the Uranium to Russia, and the Trump Family had a vast empire at the same time taking in huge amounts of money just for Trump GOING to Russia to give speeches in Moscow, WOULD YOU BE ON HERE TODAY DEFENDING THESE ACTIONS AS INNOCENT, AS A 'MORONIC ALLEGATION,' and 'ANNOYINGLY STUPID?'

Indeed, Trump has done FAR LESS, with no known or proven ties, no sale of anything, only suspicions, and you are on here everyday celebrating a Special Counsel and now a Grand Jury.

WHEN are you going to stop these amazingly stupid, moronic allegations over something entirely innocent???

Except there was no sale of uranium to Russia.

Let me repeat that, no uranium mined in the US was ever shipped to Russia.

You see we must import 80% of the Uranium we need. So by law all uranium mined in the US must be sold here unless the company applies for and receives a special export license. The US subsidiaries sell all the uranium that they mine here in the US.

Of course the profits go to the owners, but that's is what capitalism is all about, isn't it? You're not one of the anti-capitalist are you?

So let's assume that everything you said is right and NO special export licenses were EVER given to any overseas companies anywhere, what you are saying is that you are OK with Russia making money, a nice thick profit off of our own uranium?

Maybe THAT is what Obama meant when he said he could be more flexible? A number of investors in Uranium One gave donations to the Clinton Foundation during the time the sale was being considered (between 2008 and 2010), in part through the participation of Frank Giustra, a Canadian mining magnate who was a large donor to the Clinton Foundation and who had controlled a company that eventually bought Uranium One.

In addition, Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 in 2010 to give a speech to a Russian bank with ties to the Russian government. The U.S. government eventually approved the deal in 2010.

The reason this is a story is the potential that there was some quid pro quo involved: that in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation and/or the speech Bill Clinton gave in Russia, Hillary Clinton used her position as Secretary of State to make approval of this sale happen. It need not be explicit, but at the very least there has to be a connection between donations and official actions that Clinton took. The only evidence for now is timing: people who would benefit from the sale made donations to the Clinton Foundation at around the same time the matter was before the government.

Even if Clinton had wanted to make sure the sale was approved, it wouldn't have been possible for her to do it on her own. CFIUS is made up of not only the Secretary of State, but also the secretaries of Treasury, Justice, Homeland Security, Commerce, Defense, and Energy, as well as the heads of the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and the Office of Science and Technology Policy.

ALL OF THESE PEOPLE were part of the Obama Administration under the direct control and influence of Barack Obama. An amazing number of coincidences that all worked in the favor of both the Clintons as well as Vladimir Putin; BOTH were much better off after than they were before, BUT I'M SURE it was all just good business! ;)


IF WE TOOK THE CLINTONS OUT OF THIS STORY AND REPLACED THEM WITH THE TRUMP FAMILY, there would be pandemonium in the streets, riots in Congress, calls for impeachment with Maxine Waters jumping out of her skin decrying TREASON!!!!

Oh, wait----- they are already doing that with no actions or evidence found. IN FACT, THE BEST EVIDENCE THE DNC HAS FOUND TO DATE is that the Trump Administration and GOP have agreed to have a Special Counsel to LOOK FOR EVIDENCE!!!

Conversely, while pummeling the Trumps with heinous accusations with nothing to even back them up, the Left looks for every convenience and excuse imaginable to utterly dismiss any suspicions against both Barack Obama and The Clintons with nary a second look. That is why no one takes the Left very serious at all. They see spiders under everyone's bed, EXCEPT THEIR OWN.





 
Last edited:
The Clintons have released all of their personal income taxes going back thirty years. The financials for the foundation are also publicly available.
...and under continued investigation by the FBI... :p


Morons like Queasy DEMAND "proof' on Trump's collusion with Russia, etc.......but then, relies on "rumors' regarding Hillary Clinton's "lock her up" mantra.....
Hypocritical bastard.......LOL
 
The Clintons have released all of their personal income taxes going back thirty years. The financials for the foundation are also publicly available.
...and under continued investigation by the FBI... :p


Morons like Queasy DEMAND "proof' on Trump's collusion with Russia, etc.......but then, relies on "rumors' regarding Hillary Clinton's "lock her up" mantra.....
Hypocritical bastard.......LOL

Doesn't ALL extraordinary accusations require proof? In the Trump Administration's case, ALL THERE IS is rumors and a few likely coincidences that by themselves lead nowhere, yet have lead to calls for impeachment and treason before any investigation has even begun, while in the CLINTON case, as detailed above, there is a long chain of circumstantial evidence the combination of which is not only remarkable in its coincidence but highly suspicious, truly demanding a closer look at, YET NO INVESTIGATION HAS EVER BEEN DONE.
 
Nope the the thread is about the lie that Sec. Clinton gave away 20% of our uranium to Russia
...and the compensation she received for influence in trying to make the deal happen. Dude, the day after the election, there were a LOT of pi$$ed off Clinton Foundation donors, to include the Russians, who had spent a LOT of money for favors and influence they realized they would NEVER receive due to Hillary's loss. :p

So what you're say is that they got nothing? No uranium from the deal? That mean it was only pay. No play. Stupid fucking Russians sounds like to me. All those millions of dollars for a tiny bit of uranium ore that they couldn't export out of the US. What a bunch of dumbasses........
 
The Clintons have released all of their personal income taxes going back thirty years. The financials for the foundation are also publicly available.
...and under continued investigation by the FBI... :p


Morons like Queasy DEMAND "proof' on Trump's collusion with Russia, etc.......but then, relies on "rumors' regarding Hillary Clinton's "lock her up" mantra.....
Hypocritical bastard.......LOL

Doesn't ALL extraordinary accusations require proof? In the Trump Administration's case, ALL THERE IS is rumors and a few likely coincidences that by themselves lead nowhere, yet have lead to calls for impeachment and treason before any investigation has even begun, while in the CLINTON case, as detailed above, there is a long chain of circumstantial evidence the combination of which is not only remarkable in its coincidence but highly suspicious, truly demanding a closer look at, YET NO INVESTIGATION HAS EVER BEEN DONE.


You have a republican moron in the WH, a republican majority congress....GO FOR IT !!! LOL
 
She was a participant, and if not a participant demonstrated pure incompetence. You can read right? This story and the BS who spread it pretend she wasn't a player, but she was. The Clinton Foundation also received money from some of the investors. Weird right? Additionally, Obama allowed the transaction. All this clearly shows the Clintons and Obama's were in the mix with the Russians on the subject of URANIUM, yet Trump is the fucking traitor. I mean shit, Trump Jr. met with a dirty Russian on the subject of dirty Clinton but not. Liberals are so so rational.

The OP is rich, appreciate the laugh.

The facts behind Trump’s repeated claim about Hillary Clinton’s role in the Russian uranium deal

And to back up your claim you use a link that calls Trump a liar and finds no link between Mrs. Clinton and the sale? Ok.

I read you can't read. You only know what someone tells you, on the condition it makes you happy. FACT: CLINTON WAS A PARTICIPANT & OBAMA ALLOWED IT. "The deal gave Russia control of about 20 percent of U.S. uranium extraction capacity," . Fact: The Clinton foundation received MILLIONS from the Russians, but you know, Trump is a traitor.

Shucks golly, Clinton was innocent even though her department was responsible for vetting for national security. They ALLOWED it and have since declared the Russian's our dirty enemy, because Trump knocked out the Democrats.

You just can't make this stuff up. But remember, TRUMP IS THE RUSSIAN TRAITOR. Let's be honest, liberal narrative is consistent, because it never makes sense. You people are hypocrites and liars, just like the party and narratives you adore.

Again, I'd like to thank the OP for this thread. It truly exposes the the hypocrisy and idiocy of the left, much more now than before. But you know, liberals are just victims. Falling snowflakes.
 
Last edited:
She was a participant, and if not a participant demonstrated pure incompetence. You can read right? This story and the BS who spread it pretend she wasn't a player, but she was. The Clinton Foundation also received money from some of the investors. Weird right? Additionally, Obama allowed the transaction. All this clearly shows the Clintons and Obama's were in the mix with the Russians on the subject of URANIUM, yet Trump is the fucking traitor. I mean shit, Trump Jr. met with a dirty Russian on the subject of dirty Clinton but not. Liberals are so so rational.

The OP is rich, appreciate the laugh.

The facts behind Trump’s repeated claim about Hillary Clinton’s role in the Russian uranium deal

And to back up your claim you use a link that calls Trump a liar and finds no link between Mrs. Clinton and the sale? Ok.

I read you can't read. You only know what someone tells you, on the condition it makes you happy. FACT: CLINTON WAS A PARTICIPANT & OBAMA ALLOWED IT. "The deal gave Russia control of about 20 percent of U.S. uranium extraction capacity," . Fact: The Clinton foundation received MILLIONS from the Russians, but you know, Trump is a traitor.

Shucks golly, Clinton was innocent even though her department was responsible for vetting for national security. They ALLOWED it and have since declared the Russian's our dirty enemy, because Trump knocked out the Democrats.

You just can't make this stuff up. But remember, TRUMP IS THE RUSSIAN TRAITOR. Let's be honest, liberal narrative is consistent, because it never makes sense. You people are hypocrites and liars, just like the party and narratives you adore.

Again, I'd like to thank the OP for this thread. It truly exposes the the hypocrisy and idiocy of the left, much more now than before. But you know, liberals are just victims. Falling snowflakes.

Ah, you seem mad, bro.
 
She was a participant, and if not a participant demonstrated pure incompetence. You can read right? This story and the BS who spread it pretend she wasn't a player, but she was. The Clinton Foundation also received money from some of the investors. Weird right? Additionally, Obama allowed the transaction. All this clearly shows the Clintons and Obama's were in the mix with the Russians on the subject of URANIUM, yet Trump is the fucking traitor. I mean shit, Trump Jr. met with a dirty Russian on the subject of dirty Clinton but not. Liberals are so so rational.

The OP is rich, appreciate the laugh.

The facts behind Trump’s repeated claim about Hillary Clinton’s role in the Russian uranium deal

And to back up your claim you use a link that calls Trump a liar and finds no link between Mrs. Clinton and the sale? Ok.

I read you can't read. You only know what someone tells you, on the condition it makes you happy. FACT: CLINTON WAS A PARTICIPANT & OBAMA ALLOWED IT. "The deal gave Russia control of about 20 percent of U.S. uranium extraction capacity," . Fact: The Clinton foundation received MILLIONS from the Russians, but you know, Trump is a traitor.

Shucks golly, Clinton was innocent even though her department was responsible for vetting for national security. They ALLOWED it and have since declared the Russian's our dirty enemy, because Trump knocked out the Democrats.

You just can't make this stuff up. But remember, TRUMP IS THE RUSSIAN TRAITOR. Let's be honest, liberal narrative is consistent, because it never makes sense. You people are hypocrites and liars, just like the party and narratives you adore.

Again, I'd like to thank the OP for this thread. It truly exposes the the hypocrisy and idiocy of the left, much more now than before. But you know, liberals are just victims. Falling snowflakes.

In reality US law controls the extracted uranium at all uranium mines located in the US, regardless of who owns the mines. Since we produce only 20% of the uranium we need for our reactor and medical needs by law all the ore produced here must be sold here unless a special export license is granted.

So are you saying sec Clinton swindled the Russians out of millions of dollars for uranium they never got?

The Russians do make a little profit off the uranium mines. That's capitalism. Are you anti-capitalist too?
 
So...Russians are bad again?
Sheesh it's hard to keep up...I need to watch Fox more.
 
Every once in a while, right wingers bring up this moronic allegation spurred on by Trump and right wing outlets, about Clinton "giving' Russia "our uranium" in exchange for millions of rubles.....

The allegation is not only annoying and stupid, but it also shows how truly ignorant those people who make the allegation may be........Let this story die.....please.

Russian to Judgment
Allegations of a "quid pro quo" deal giving Russia ownership of one-fifth of U.S. uranium deposits in exchange for $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation are unsubstantiated.

FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?


So, in reading the Snopes article, the salient points were:

1). President Obama approved the sale of the Uranium.
2). Secretary Clinton approved the uranium sale.
3). Little was known of the Clinton Foundation.
4). The Clinton Foundation deserved all the scrutiny it could get.

Now let me ask:

Had President Trump and Secretary Tillerson been involved in approving the sale of the Uranium to Russia, and the Trump Family had a vast empire at the same time taking in huge amounts of money just for Trump GOING to Russia to give speeches in Moscow, WOULD YOU BE ON HERE TODAY DEFENDING THESE ACTIONS AS INNOCENT, AS A 'MORONIC ALLEGATION,' and 'ANNOYINGLY STUPID?'

Indeed, Trump has done FAR LESS, with no known or proven ties, no sale of anything, only suspicions, and you are on here everyday celebrating a Special Counsel and now a Grand Jury.

WHEN are you going to stop these amazingly stupid, moronic allegations over something entirely innocent???

Except there was no sale of uranium to Russia.

Let me repeat that, no uranium mined in the US was ever shipped to Russia.

You see we must import 80% of the Uranium we need. So by law all uranium mined in the US must be sold here unless the company applies for and receives a special export license. The US subsidiaries sell all the uranium that they mine here in the US.

Of course the profits go to the owners, but that's is what capitalism is all about, isn't it? You're not one of the anti-capitalist are you?

So let's assume that everything you said is right and NO special export licenses were EVER given to any overseas companies anywhere, what you are saying is that you are OK with Russia making money, a nice thick profit off of our own uranium?

Maybe THAT is what Obama meant when he said he could be more flexible? A number of investors in Uranium One gave donations to the Clinton Foundation during the time the sale was being considered (between 2008 and 2010), in part through the participation of Frank Giustra, a Canadian mining magnate who was a large donor to the Clinton Foundation and who had controlled a company that eventually bought Uranium One.

In addition, Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 in 2010 to give a speech to a Russian bank with ties to the Russian government. The U.S. government eventually approved the deal in 2010.

The reason this is a story is the potential that there was some quid pro quo involved: that in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation and/or the speech Bill Clinton gave in Russia, Hillary Clinton used her position as Secretary of State to make approval of this sale happen. It need not be explicit, but at the very least there has to be a connection between donations and official actions that Clinton took. The only evidence for now is timing: people who would benefit from the sale made donations to the Clinton Foundation at around the same time the matter was before the government.

Even if Clinton had wanted to make sure the sale was approved, it wouldn't have been possible for her to do it on her own. CFIUS is made up of not only the Secretary of State, but also the secretaries of Treasury, Justice, Homeland Security, Commerce, Defense, and Energy, as well as the heads of the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and the Office of Science and Technology Policy.

ALL OF THESE PEOPLE were part of the Obama Administration under the direct control and influence of Barack Obama. An amazing number of coincidences that all worked in the favor of both the Clintons as well as Vladimir Putin; BOTH were much better off after than they were before, BUT I'M SURE it was all just good business! ;)


IF WE TOOK THE CLINTONS OUT OF THIS STORY AND REPLACED THEM WITH THE TRUMP FAMILY, there would be pandemonium in the streets, riots in Congress, calls for impeachment with Maxine Waters jumping out of her skin decrying TREASON!!!!

Oh, wait----- they are already doing that with no actions or evidence found. IN FACT, THE BEST EVIDENCE THE DNC HAS FOUND TO DATE is that the Trump Administration and GOP have agreed to have a Special Counsel to LOOK FOR EVIDENCE!!!

Conversely, while pummeling the Trumps with heinous accusations with nothing to even back them up, the Left looks for every convenience and excuse imaginable to utterly dismiss any suspicions against both Barack Obama and The Clintons with nary a second look. That is why no one takes the Left very serious at all. They see spiders under everyone's bed, EXCEPT THEIR OWN.




why not the Russians earning a profit? It was Canadian owned before that, who earned the profit...
 
Maybe most radical liberal posters on the forum went to foreign schools or dropped out of school in the 8th grade. Did any educated left winger ever get to post a video or a left wing blog as a term paper? You can't even get a radical lib to argue their side about the political agenda. All you get is inane links and glitzy borrowed tiresome cartoons or photo shopped junk.
Nothing like a feeble minded Trumpette insulting someone's intelligence.

We know for whom you voted.

Case closed.
 
Every once in a while, right wingers bring up this moronic allegation spurred on by Trump and right wing outlets, about Clinton "giving' Russia "our uranium" in exchange for millions of rubles.....

The allegation is not only annoying and stupid, but it also shows how truly ignorant those people who make the allegation may be........Let this story die.....please.

Russian to Judgment
Allegations of a "quid pro quo" deal giving Russia ownership of one-fifth of U.S. uranium deposits in exchange for $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation are unsubstantiated.

FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?
Here's a thought. Why do you have to defend such a thing? If it wasn't a crooked deal.
Why? To shut up you dumbass Trumpettes who keep lying about it.
 
Every once in a while, right wingers bring up this moronic allegation spurred on by Trump and right wing outlets, about Clinton "giving' Russia "our uranium" in exchange for millions of rubles.....

The allegation is not only annoying and stupid, but it also shows how truly ignorant those people who make the allegation may be........Let this story die.....please.

Russian to Judgment
Allegations of a "quid pro quo" deal giving Russia ownership of one-fifth of U.S. uranium deposits in exchange for $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation are unsubstantiated.

FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?


So, in reading the Snopes article, the salient points were:

1). President Obama approved the sale of the Uranium.
2). Secretary Clinton approved the uranium sale.
3). Little was known of the Clinton Foundation.
4). The Clinton Foundation deserved all the scrutiny it could get.

Now let me ask:

Had President Trump and Secretary Tillerson been involved in approving the sale of the Uranium to Russia, and the Trump Family had a vast empire at the same time taking in huge amounts of money just for Trump GOING to Russia to give speeches in Moscow, WOULD YOU BE ON HERE TODAY DEFENDING THESE ACTIONS AS INNOCENT, AS A 'MORONIC ALLEGATION,' and 'ANNOYINGLY STUPID?'

Indeed, Trump has done FAR LESS, with no known or proven ties, no sale of anything, only suspicions, and you are on here everyday celebrating a Special Counsel and now a Grand Jury.

WHEN are you going to stop these amazingly stupid, moronic allegations over something entirely innocent???

Except there was no sale of uranium to Russia.

Let me repeat that, no uranium mined in the US was ever shipped to Russia.

You see we must import 80% of the Uranium we need. So by law all uranium mined in the US must be sold here unless the company applies for and receives a special export license. The US subsidiaries sell all the uranium that they mine here in the US.

Of course the profits go to the owners, but that's is what capitalism is all about, isn't it? You're not one of the anti-capitalist are you?

So let's assume that everything you said is right and NO special export licenses were EVER given to any overseas companies anywhere, what you are saying is that you are OK with Russia making money, a nice thick profit off of our own uranium?

Maybe THAT is what Obama meant when he said he could be more flexible? A number of investors in Uranium One gave donations to the Clinton Foundation during the time the sale was being considered (between 2008 and 2010), in part through the participation of Frank Giustra, a Canadian mining magnate who was a large donor to the Clinton Foundation and who had controlled a company that eventually bought Uranium One.

In addition, Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 in 2010 to give a speech to a Russian bank with ties to the Russian government. The U.S. government eventually approved the deal in 2010.

The reason this is a story is the potential that there was some quid pro quo involved: that in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation and/or the speech Bill Clinton gave in Russia, Hillary Clinton used her position as Secretary of State to make approval of this sale happen. It need not be explicit, but at the very least there has to be a connection between donations and official actions that Clinton took. The only evidence for now is timing: people who would benefit from the sale made donations to the Clinton Foundation at around the same time the matter was before the government.

Even if Clinton had wanted to make sure the sale was approved, it wouldn't have been possible for her to do it on her own. CFIUS is made up of not only the Secretary of State, but also the secretaries of Treasury, Justice, Homeland Security, Commerce, Defense, and Energy, as well as the heads of the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and the Office of Science and Technology Policy.

ALL OF THESE PEOPLE were part of the Obama Administration under the direct control and influence of Barack Obama. An amazing number of coincidences that all worked in the favor of both the Clintons as well as Vladimir Putin; BOTH were much better off after than they were before, BUT I'M SURE it was all just good business! ;)


IF WE TOOK THE CLINTONS OUT OF THIS STORY AND REPLACED THEM WITH THE TRUMP FAMILY, there would be pandemonium in the streets, riots in Congress, calls for impeachment with Maxine Waters jumping out of her skin decrying TREASON!!!!

Oh, wait----- they are already doing that with no actions or evidence found. IN FACT, THE BEST EVIDENCE THE DNC HAS FOUND TO DATE is that the Trump Administration and GOP have agreed to have a Special Counsel to LOOK FOR EVIDENCE!!!

Conversely, while pummeling the Trumps with heinous accusations with nothing to even back them up, the Left looks for every convenience and excuse imaginable to utterly dismiss any suspicions against both Barack Obama and The Clintons with nary a second look. That is why no one takes the Left very serious at all. They see spiders under everyone's bed, EXCEPT THEIR OWN.



why not the Russians earning a profit? It was Canadian owned before that, who earned the profit...

Toober jumps off the "Hillary gave 20% of our uranium to Russia" bandwagon to the fall back position, profit.

Profit is bad now.

Must be one of them Anti-Capitalist.
 

Forum List

Back
Top