Clarence And Virginia Thomas Have An Impressively Corrupt Activist Judge Scheme Going

Actually that is true. The court views the world through different eyes and experiences. That's why Sandra Day O'Connor based her GITMO decision on the war on terror lasting no longer than any other war.
Or Scalia no longer seeing any racial prejudice to sustain the voting rights act.
That isn't how the law is supposed to work, moron. Law that is different for one race than it is for another is unjust law. That's what we had during the Jim Crow era. You just endorsed it.
You confuse the melting pot. A stew is made by adding more ingredients.
Thus justices each bring a different perspective to the collective table.
I confuse nothing. Either you want the law to apply equally to everyone or you don't.

Furthermore, leftwingers don't believe in the melting pot. they believe in identity politics, the war of all against all.
 
Everyone wants higher spending for their particular piece of the pie, but they don't want higher spending on the whole.

The problem is that idiots like you don't know the difference. They think if they don't have an airport in their community, that spending on airports won't help them.
 
Please post a link this phone call Biden made to Putin where he accused him of foul deeds. How did the press listen to both sides of the call?
I already posted the link to the article where Putin admitted

The Russian leader says his first call with the new US president was "business-like and frank".
In short, the press doesn't know what was actually said, yet you believe that's the equivalent of Trump accusing Putin of committing crimes against the United States before the whole world.

You're an idiot.
 
Everyone wants higher spending for their particular piece of the pie, but they don't want higher spending on the whole.

The problem is that idiots like you don't know the difference. They think if they don't have an airport in their community, that spending on airports won't help them.
The problem with you idiots is that you will tell them that it does.
 
Everyone wants higher spending for their particular piece of the pie, but they don't want higher spending on the whole.

The problem is that idiots like you don't know the difference. They think if they don't have an airport in their community, that spending on airports won't help them.
Actually, spending on airports is probably better done locally. If a big city needs a new one, that's not a federal issue.

Most spending in general is better to do on the state or local level.
 
You confuse the melting pot. A stew is made by adding more ingredients.
Thus justices each bring a different perspective to the collective table.
I confuse nothing. Either you want the law to apply equally to everyone or you don't.
You are the confused one. This is why Rudy Bader Ginsburg was able to stand up for the rights of half the population. Both before and after reaching the highest court.
 
You confuse the melting pot. A stew is made by adding more ingredients.
Thus justices each bring a different perspective to the collective table.
I confuse nothing. Either you want the law to apply equally to everyone or you don't.
You are the confused one. This is why Rudy Bader Ginsburg was able to stand up for the rights of half the population. Both before and after reaching the highest court.
The rights of one half the population are the same as the rights of the other half. Ginsburg did nothing.
 
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife, far-right activist Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, have quite the scheme going. She takes in dark money contributions to her Tea Party-connected nonprofit, Liberty Central, and organizes Republicans on exactly the kind of issues that often reach the Supreme Court. He sits on the Supreme Court and never recuses himself as justices are called on by federal law to do in certain situations, including ones where their spouses have financial interests.

And this is going on while Justice Stephen Breyer is solemnly warning that expanding the Supreme Court might be a problem because “Structural alteration motivated by the perception of political influence can only feed” the perception that the court is guided by politics, “further eroding that trust.” As if that ship had not long since sailed.



This current court is corrupt beyond all recognition. The Republicans in Congress have destroyed any precept that the court is independent, unbiased, or in any way represents the people or the very laws by which they are tasked to interpret. The Democrats have an absolute mandate to repair the damage done to the federal judiciary by a minority that has appointed it in a mistaken and corrupt sense of entitlement, the majority of the country disagrees with, and the Constitution does not recognize.
You wouldn't recognize corruption if it hit you in the face...its your party that have no bounds....
 
I already posted the link to the article where Putin admitted

The Russian leader says his first call with the new US president was "business-like and frank".
In short, the press doesn't know what was actually said, yet you believe that's the equivalent of Trump accusing Putin of committing crimes against the United States before the whole world.

You're an idiot.
On the novelty of Biden calling Putin a killer - The Washington ...
https://www.washingtonpost.com › politics › 2021/03/18


Mar 18, 2021 — Biden's comment about the Russian president broke with Trump's approach — and evoked a strong reaction.
 
I already posted the link to the article where Putin admitted

The Russian leader says his first call with the new US president was "business-like and frank".
In short, the press doesn't know what was actually said, yet you believe that's the equivalent of Trump accusing Putin of committing crimes against the United States before the whole world.

You're an idiot.
On the novelty of Biden calling Putin a killer - The Washington ...
https://www.washingtonpost.com › politics › 2021/03/18


Mar 18, 2021 — Biden's comment about the Russian president broke with Trump's approach — and evoked a strong reaction.
When did he say these things standing next to Putin in front of the world press?
 
You confuse the melting pot. A stew is made by adding more ingredients.
Thus justices each bring a different perspective to the collective table.
I confuse nothing. Either you want the law to apply equally to everyone or you don't.
You are the confused one. This is why Rudy Bader Ginsburg was able to stand up for the rights of half the population. Both before and after reaching the highest court.
and every night the old bag made love to her stuffed Stalin doll
 
Actually, spending on airports is probably better done locally. If a big city needs a new one, that's not a federal issue.

Most spending in general is better to do on the state or local level.
Every airport effects every other airport. And states aren't allowed to coordinate their efforts without the consent of congress.
 
I already posted the link to the article where Putin admitted

The Russian leader says his first call with the new US president was "business-like and frank".
In short, the press doesn't know what was actually said, yet you believe that's the equivalent of Trump accusing Putin of committing crimes against the United States before the whole world.

You're an idiot.
On the novelty of Biden calling Putin a killer - The Washington ...
https://www.washingtonpost.com › politics › 2021/03/18


Mar 18, 2021 — Biden's comment about the Russian president broke with Trump's approach — and evoked a strong reaction.
Your article is behind a paywall. Biden made his comments while he was hiding in the basement, not standing next to Putin in front of the world press.
 
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife, far-right activist Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, have quite the scheme going. She takes in dark money contributions to her Tea Party-connected nonprofit, Liberty Central, and organizes Republicans on exactly the kind of issues that often reach the Supreme Court. He sits on the Supreme Court and never recuses himself as justices are called on by federal law to do in certain situations, including ones where their spouses have financial interests.

And this is going on while Justice Stephen Breyer is solemnly warning that expanding the Supreme Court might be a problem because “Structural alteration motivated by the perception of political influence can only feed” the perception that the court is guided by politics, “further eroding that trust.” As if that ship had not long since sailed.



This current court is corrupt beyond all recognition. The Republicans in Congress have destroyed any precept that the court is independent, unbiased, or in any way represents the people or the very laws by which they are tasked to interpret. The Democrats have an absolute mandate to repair the damage done to the federal judiciary by a minority that has appointed it in a mistaken and corrupt sense of entitlement, the majority of the country disagrees with, and the Constitution does not recognize.
you are a disgusting racist...take a good look at yourself in the mirror and ask "why do I hate black people?"
 
Actually, spending on airports is probably better done locally. If a big city needs a new one, that's not a federal issue.

Most spending in general is better to do on the state or local level.
Every airport effects every other airport. And states aren't allowed to coordinate their efforts without the consent of congress.
The later claim isn't true and the former claim is bullshit. That would rule out states making any of their own laws.
 

Forum List

Back
Top