Clarence And Virginia Thomas Have An Impressively Corrupt Activist Judge Scheme Going

They got a grand jury to indict 12 Russians by name for their proven role in influencing the 2016 election in favor of Donald Trump.
That was a soviet style indictment that the Deep State never brought to trial

it was strictly to impress libs
Trump never asked Putin to extradite those charged.
And Trump believed Putin when he said he didn't interfere in the 2016 elections.
And Trump believed the Prince when he said he had nothing to do with the reporters execution and dismemberment.
Trump believed Kim Jong Un.

Notice a pattern of believing tyrants over the intelligence community.
You haven't got a clue as to what Trump believes, you fucking moron.
 
I'm fine with letting biological males dominate all sports, whether they are cisgender or trans. We should just acknowledge that's what would happen after ending said segregation by sex.
Any advantage severely diminishes after the current 1 year transition delay. And absolutely no advantage after 2 years. So any influence you would see in womens sports would be at best short lived.
Another dog whistle issue.
 
The Democrats have an absolute mandate to repair the damage done to the federal judiciary by a minority that has appointed it in a mistaken and corrupt sense of entitlement, the majority of the country disagrees with, and the Constitution does not recognize.
The democrats were busy playing by the rules. Putting the most qualified judges they could find into the federal courts. While republicans based their picks on ideology first, last and only.

That's why republican presidents set records for the number of unqualified (as judged by an ABA panel that reviews judicial qualifications) people they nominated to be on the courts. And the republican senate set records for the number of unqualified and barely qualified judges they packed into the federal courts.

Just look at the number of confirmation votes the current members of the supreme court received. It clearly shows republicans changed from qualifications, Such as Antonin Scalia, to ideology like Clarence Thomas.
They ABA is a grossly partisan organization which gives better ratings to leftwing judges purely because of their political orientation. Their ratings mean nothing.
 
You should know better. It wasn't the findings of the intelligence agencies, it was the FORCED findings after Dick Cheney told them to "rethink" their original judgment. And the office of special plans introduced bogus "curveball" data into intelligence analysis.

The intelligence agencies originally agreed that Iraq didn't have WMD's, but as we saw, Bush and Cheney made up the "WMD" story, as an issue to unify around, and forced Colin Powell over his objection, to present the "this is bullshit" to the United Nations.
And you don't think they get manipulated by other administrations or other interests?
You're talking an 80/20. That other administrations influenced intelligence by 20%
While to create WMD's in Iraq the administration influenced intelligence by 80%.

That's why none of of the "reality" they claimed was happening in Iraq was ever found. Even after spending a decade, and billions of dollars looking for it.
You live in a fantasy land.
 
Putting the most qualified judges they could find into the federal courts.
What happened with the "wise Latina"?
was born in Bronx, New York, on June 25, 1954. She earned a B.A. in 1976 from Princeton University, graduating summa cum laude and receiving the university’s highest academic honor. In 1979, she earned a J.D. from Yale Law School where she served as an editor of the Yale Law Journal. She served as Assistant District Attorney in the New York County District Attorney’s Office from 1979–1984. She then litigated international commercial matters in New York City at Pavia & Harcourt, where she served as an associate and then partner from 1984–1992. In 1991, President George H.W. Bush nominated her to the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, and she served in that role from 1992–1998. She served as a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit from 1998–2009. President Barack Obama nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on May 26, 2009, and she assumed this role August 8, 2009.
 
What's their position on Mr. Potato head, or Dr. Seus. Other issues intended to misdirect.

Which have nothing to do with running the government for the benefit of the people.
I'm not saying the right has the support of the majority on everything either. But the trans issue does actually have something to do with the benefit of the public. So do border and immigration issues.
The trans issue is a red meat dog whistle that has virtually nothing to do, except to stir up prejudice.

This is no different than claiming that men will undergo months of hormone therapy in order to listen to little girls "pee"
Only irrational morons believe that the trans issue is a "dog whistle." They simply have no logical argument to support their wacko agenda, so they resort to pure ad hominems. Allowing transgenders to compete in women's sports is a gross attack on women's rights.
 
Putting the most qualified judges they could find into the federal courts.
What happened with the "wise Latina"?
was born in Bronx, New York, on June 25, 1954. She earned a B.A. in 1976 from Princeton University, graduating summa cum laude and receiving the university’s highest academic honor. In 1979, she earned a J.D. from Yale Law School where she served as an editor of the Yale Law Journal. She served as Assistant District Attorney in the New York County District Attorney’s Office from 1979–1984. She then litigated international commercial matters in New York City at Pavia & Harcourt, where she served as an associate and then partner from 1984–1992. In 1991, President George H.W. Bush nominated her to the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, and she served in that role from 1992–1998. She served as a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit from 1998–2009. President Barack Obama nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on May 26, 2009, and she assumed this role August 8, 2009.
She was put on the court purely because she is female and Hispanic. Numerous Democrats even admitted as much.
 
It has to do with keeping female sports relevant.
Then how about paying female players even half what male players make? How about starting there?
That would depend on if they generate half of the revenue that the male players do. Payment is according to market and performance.

However, I was also referring to collegiate sports (and other scholastic levels). That being said, I think the NCAA shouldn't be able to prohibit collegiate athletes from getting paid or having endorsements. They make tons of money for many schools, and they should be able to profit off of their own labor.
 
That's why none of of the "reality" they claimed was happening in Iraq was ever found. Even after spending a decade, and billions of dollars looking for it.
I'm not so sure of that. I think our intelligence agencies are regularly manipulated to push us towards various foreign conflicts. The only difference with Iraq is that they weren't being subtle about it, and the media didn't play along (at least after a while). They did play along in the beginning.
As I said 80/20 in the manipulation of national intelligence.
 
That's your answer to everything.

Because you have no answer to anything.
No, that's the answer as to why Biden won.
IF that's why Biden won, then democrats should be running the country, since it's obvious they can pull off a D-Day size operation, without leaving any evidence before or after that they did it. Or a trace of evidence it ever happened.
They left plenty of evidence, moron.

iu
 
That's why none of of the "reality" they claimed was happening in Iraq was ever found. Even after spending a decade, and billions of dollars looking for it.
I'm not so sure of that. I think our intelligence agencies are regularly manipulated to push us towards various foreign conflicts. The only difference with Iraq is that they weren't being subtle about it, and the media didn't play along (at least after a while). They did play along in the beginning.
As I said 80/20 in the manipulation of national intelligence.
Based on what?
 
Russia has meddled in every election we've had since the communists came to power. What the hell does that have to do with Trump?
Funny thing.
With the russians interfering you had surprise republican wins.

But when the russians stopped in 2020, the result was a democratic landslide.
 
I'm fine with letting biological males dominate all sports, whether they are cisgender or trans. We should just acknowledge that's what would happen after ending said segregation by sex.
Any advantage severely diminishes after the current 1 year transition delay. And absolutely no advantage after 2 years. So any influence you would see in womens sports would be at best short lived.
Another dog whistle issue.
The empiracle data show you to be wrong. A person acquires a permanent physical advantage over femails if they grow up as a male
 
Russia has meddled in every election we've had since the communists came to power. What the hell does that have to do with Trump?
Funny thing.
With the russians interfering you had surprise republican wins.

But when the russians stopped in 2020, the result was a democratic landslide.
The Russians have always interfered, you fucking moron. The interfered in 2020 as well.
 
They voted against, because the positions the conservatives put to them had absolutely no support in law. And no matter how much they might try to manipulate their view to give it legal support, there was absolutely nothing in the constitution or case law to support it.
When has that ever stopped the court?
You just posted it. Don't you read your own posts?
 
Russia has meddled in every election we've had since the communists came to power. What the hell does that have to do with Trump?
Funny thing.
With the russians interfering you had surprise republican wins.

But when the russians stopped in 2020, the result was a democratic landslide.
It's funny how Biden won in 2020 when we had massive voter fraud. The result was a democratic landslide.
 
They voted against, because the positions the conservatives put to them had absolutely no support in law. And no matter how much they might try to manipulate their view to give it legal support, there was absolutely nothing in the constitution or case law to support it.
When has that ever stopped the court?
You just posted it. Don't you read your own posts?
What did I post that supports that claim, moron?
 
And Trump believed Putin when he said he didn't interfere in the 2016 elections.
And Trump believed the Prince when he said he had nothing to do with the reporters execution and dismemberment.
Trump believed Kim Jong Un.

Notice a pattern of believing tyrants over the intelligence community.
You haven't got a clue as to what Trump believes, you fucking moron.
I'm going by what Trump said, what Trump tweeted, and by what Trump did.

If you don't think Trump agreed with these tyrants over the intelligence community you're an absolute moron.
 

Forum List

Back
Top