Clarence And Virginia Thomas Have An Impressively Corrupt Activist Judge Scheme Going

To be clear, Thomas is on the Supreme Court because of his ethnicity, but no liberal judges are on because of their ethnicity?

Now does that make sense?
The difference is how that choice came about. Democrats compiled a list ranking the highest qualified candidates, and then chose from among those of the highest ranking based on race, religion, etc.

When it came to Clarence Thomas, republicans threw out the highest ranked candidates, and looked well down on the list to find a conservative black justice.
 
To be clear, Thomas is on the Supreme Court because of his ethnicity, but no liberal judges are on because of their ethnicity?

Now does that make sense?
The difference is how that choice came about. Democrats compiled a list ranking the highest qualified candidates, and then chose from among those of the highest ranking based on race, religion, etc.

When it came to Clarence Thomas, republicans threw out the highest ranked candidates, and looked well down on the list to find a conservative black justice.

Who should have been chosen instead of Thomas? Who was replacing Marshall.
 
Explain how the liberal judges were not put on the court because of their intersectional demoographics.

Take the Hispanic, the Jew, and the lesbian.
Republicans found them to be well qualified, the ABA found them to be well qualified, and even the democrats found them to be well qualified.
Their race, religion, national origin may have been "A" factor, but their qualifications were "THE" factor in choosing them.

Unlike with Thomas, who was ranked well below the other candidates on the list.
 
Yes, no qualifications for Thomas to sit on the high court. Only his race. Just as easily we could have put Dr Dre on the court.
Republicans are famous for nominating, and getting unqualified judges onto federal courts.
Even senator John Kennedy (Louisiana) famously ridiculed one of Trumps unqualified picks.

To be clear, Thomas is on the Supreme Court because of his ethnicity, but no liberal judges are on because of their ethnicity?

Now does that make sense?

Yo Colonel Anus - The Xiden meme is stupid. Kindly remove it from your sig box immediately.
You appear to be under the influence of extreme RW media.
Got OAN, Newsmax & Tucker? :lol:
 
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife, far-right activist Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, have quite the scheme going. She takes in dark money contributions to her Tea Party-connected nonprofit, Liberty Central, and organizes Republicans on exactly the kind of issues that often reach the Supreme Court. He sits on the Supreme Court and never recuses himself as justices are called on by federal law to do in certain situations, including ones where their spouses have financial interests.

And this is going on while Justice Stephen Breyer is solemnly warning that expanding the Supreme Court might be a problem because “Structural alteration motivated by the perception of political influence can only feed” the perception that the court is guided by politics, “further eroding that trust.” As if that ship had not long since sailed.



This current court is corrupt beyond all recognition. The Republicans in Congress have destroyed any precept that the court is independent, unbiased, or in any way represents the people or the very laws by which they are tasked to interpret. The Democrats have an absolute mandate to repair the damage done to the federal judiciary by a minority that has appointed it in a mistaken and corrupt sense of entitlement, the majority of the country disagrees with, and the Constitution does not recognize.
Hold on a minute here. It's not like the left is the voice of the majority.

The majority wants stricter immigration laws. The majority wants more border security. The majority does not approve of many of the agendas being pushed by the trans community (like letting transwomen compete against biological females in sports).

So, don't act like your side is supposedly representative of the majority. A "corrupt sense of entitlement" perfectly describes the push for reparations and various other minority appeasement efforts.
 
Hold on a minute here. It's not like the left is the voice of the majority.

The majority wants stricter immigration laws. The majority wants more border security. The majority does not approve of many of the agendas being pushed by the trans community (like letting transwomen compete against biological females in sports).

So, don't act like your side is supposedly representative of the majority. A "corrupt sense of entitlement" perfectly describes the push for reparations and various other minority appeasement efforts.

Sorry dude, but you are on a 80/20 or 70/30 wrong side of pretty much every issue per American voters per legit pollsters.
But do hang on and of course CHEAT - It's the only way you win again! ;)
 
Yo Colonel Anus - The Xiden meme is stupid. Kindly remove it from your sig box immediately.
You appear to be under the influence of extreme RW media.
Got OAN, Newsmax & Tucker? :lol:
Are you talking about Tucker "no one with a brain should take me seriously" Carlson?
 
Hold on a minute here. It's not like the left is the voice of the majority.

The majority wants stricter immigration laws. The majority wants more border security. The majority does not approve of many of the agendas being pushed by the trans community (like letting transwomen compete against biological females in sports).

So, don't act like your side is supposedly representative of the majority. A "corrupt sense of entitlement" perfectly describes the push for reparations and various other minority appeasement efforts.

Sorry dude, but you are on a 80/20 or 70/30 wrong side of pretty much every issue per American voters per legit pollsters.
But do hang on and of course CHEAT - It's the only way you win again! ;)
"Voter irregularities" are far more common with elections than with polls, although polls obviously can be way off (like the ones before the 2016 election).

Unless you live in a very urban area, however, you'll find that a lot of average citizens are pretty moderate and sometimes right of center on many social issues -- particularly on the trans stuff.
 
"Voter irregularities" are far more common with elections than with polls, although polls obviously can be way off (like the ones before the 2016 election).
Actually a more accurate poll would have required it reach out to the people influencing the voters. But they never bothered to poll the russian GRU.
 
Unless you live in a very urban area, however, you'll find that a lot of average citizens are pretty moderate and sometimes right of center on many social issues -- particularly on the trans stuff.
In other words, if you're NOT part of 80% of the population, you are right of center on many social issues.
 
"Voter irregularities" are far more common with elections than with polls, although polls obviously can be way off (like the ones before the 2016 election).
Actually a more accurate poll would have required it reach out to the people influencing the voters. But they never bothered to poll the russian GRU.
Or the CCP in many of our elections. As far as foreign influence goes, China, Israel and Saudi Arabia have far more influence than Russia.
 
Unless you live in a very urban area, however, you'll find that a lot of average citizens are pretty moderate and sometimes right of center on many social issues -- particularly on the trans stuff.
In other words, if you're NOT part of 80% of the population, you are right of center on many social issues.
Even most suburbs are moderate. Ask the average suburbanite if they approve of transwomen competing with biological females in sports.
 
This current court is corrupt beyond all recognition. The Republicans in Congress have destroyed any precept that the court is independent, unbiased, or in any way represents the people or the very laws by which they are tasked to interpret.
It always has been corrupt

but where it used to be reliably corrupt for leftwing causes its not quite that anymore
 
Last edited:
Actually a more accurate poll would have required it reach out to the people influencing the voters. But they never bothered to poll the russian GRU.
Or the CCP in many of our elections. As far as foreign influence goes, China, Israel and Saudi Arabia have far more influence than Russia.
Not according to the monitoring by the NSA and DHS, who have been paying attention to foreign influence over federal elections, and concluded Russia interfered in 2016, and that neither Russia nor China nor to any extent Iran were able to interfere with the election of 2020.

You can even read that in the republican senate intelligence report.
 
Actually a more accurate poll would have required it reach out to the people influencing the voters. But they never bothered to poll the russian GRU.
Or the CCP in many of our elections. As far as foreign influence goes, China, Israel and Saudi Arabia have far more influence than Russia.
Not according to the monitoring by the NSA and DHS, who have been paying attention to foreign influence over federal elections, and concluded Russia interfered in 2016, and that neither Russia nor China nor to any extent Iran were able to interfere with the election of 2020.

You can even read that in the republican senate intelligence report.
The same intelligence agencies that lied to us about WMDs in Iraq? The same intelligence agencies that have been spying on us for decades but lied about it until Snowden proved what they were doing?
 
Even most suburbs are moderate. Ask the average suburbanite if they approve of transwomen competing with biological females in sports.
What's their position on Mr. Potato head, or Dr. Seus. Other issues intended to misdirect.

Which have nothing to do with running the government for the benefit of the people.
 
Actually a more accurate poll would have required it reach out to the people influencing the voters. But they never bothered to poll the russian GRU.
Or the CCP in many of our elections. As far as foreign influence goes, China, Israel and Saudi Arabia have far more influence than Russia.
Not according to the monitoring by the NSA and DHS, who have been paying attention to foreign influence over federal elections, and concluded Russia interfered in 2016, and that neither Russia nor China nor to any extent Iran were able to interfere with the election of 2020.

You can even read that in the republican senate intelligence report.
Our spooks are imbeciles

The Deep State claims russia moved mountains to assist trump when all they did was buy a few facebook ads

big deal
 
That 'article' makes a whole lot of claims and uses them to justify openly advocating for corruption but provides not a single specific fact.....
Leftist sheep don’t need facts. They need a spoon fed narrative from their masters.
 

Forum List

Back
Top