CIA Concludes Russia Interfered In Election To Help Trump Win

[Lakhota]

The Russians interfred? SO? Very himself stated that other foreign Nations attempt to hack the United States all the time. He knew this was going on by several Nations while he was President yet did nothing.

The Democrats are being requested to turn over their server that they claimed was hacked by the Russians so their claim can be verified... but they refuse to turn over the.

The Russians attempting to interfere or hack our elections has nothing to do with Donald Trump.

No crime, no criminal activity, no collusion, no evidence, no obstruction, no case...

The reason the Democrats are trying they're fake story in the media is because they have nothing to take to a Judicial hearing.

They are spoiled, criminal children who lost an election and cannot mentally deal with it.

But you don't mind that a foreign despot like Putin helped steal the election, right?

 

[Freewill]

It's hilarious that NaziCons defended Bush and the CIA on Iraq having WMD - UNTIL the CIA concluded that Russia interfered in the election to help Trump win - which has also been verified by the NSA, FBI, and DNI. Hilarious!

And what Bush said about WMD's wasn't the CIA's fault .

The CIA Just Declassified the Document That Supposedly Justified the Iraq Invasion | VICE News

Declassified in 2009, it shows the CIA didn't have high confidence that Iraq had WMD's.

Exactly, but the CIA, NSA, FBI, and DNI all have "high confidence" that Russia interfered in the election to help Trump win. I repeat - "high confidence". It seems extremely unAmerican and unpatriotic to throw our major intelligence agencies under the bus for a brutal foreign despot like Putin. How do NaziCons justify such treasonous behavior?

Please, tell Chief Shitingpants that the situation is not as dire as you make out or is the evidence present by the FBI/CIA/NSA all that convincing. Tell him that the flow of fire water will continue.

FBI, CIA, & NSA: No Evidence Russia Hacked the Election & More…

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

 

[Freewill]

The Russians interfred? SO? Very himself stated that other foreign Nations attempt to hack the United States all the time. He knew this was going on by several Nations while he was President yet did nothing.

The Democrats are being requested to turn over their server that they claimed was hacked by the Russians so their claim can be verified... but they refuse to turn over the.

The Russians attempting to interfere or hack our elections has nothing to do with Donald Trump.

No crime, no criminal activity, no collusion, no evidence, no obstruction, no case...

The reason the Democrats are trying they're fake story in the media is because they have nothing to take to a Judicial hearing.

They are spoiled, criminal children who lost an election and cannot mentally deal with it.

But you don't mind that a foreign despot like Putin helped steal the election, right?

Hillary had way more to do with getting her ass beaten fairly and squarely then did the left's new boogieman the Russians.

 

[bripat9643]

So it's OK for Democrats to distrust the CIA, but not Republicans? Then it's treason, right?

Actually the CIA in their classified report weren't highly confident that Iraq had WMD's.

Today they have more confidence in the russians hacking the election than they had Iraq having WMD's. The problem is Bush lied about what the classified NIE actually said.

Nevertheless, the left (douche bags like you) has been saying the CIA are murderers and criminals ever since the 1960s. But now anyone who questions their claims is a traitor?

I say this whole thing is a big nothing burger, a faux scandal, and I have "high confidence" in my assessment.

 

[bripat9643]

It's hilarious that NaziCons defended Bush and the CIA on Iraq having WMD - UNTIL the CIA concluded that Russia interfered in the election to help Trump win - which has also been verified by the NSA, FBI, and DNI. Hilarious!

And what Bush said about WMD's wasn't the CIA's fault .

The CIA Just Declassified the Document That Supposedly Justified the Iraq Invasion | VICE News

Declassified in 2009, it shows the CIA didn't have high confidence that Iraq had WMD's.

Exactly, but the CIA, NSA, FBI, and DNI all have "high confidence" that Russia interfered in the election to help Trump win. I repeat - "high confidence". It seems extremely unAmerican and unpatriotic to throw our major intelligence agencies under the bus for a brutal foreign despot like Putin. How do NaziCons justify such treasonous behavior?

They have "high confidence," but they can't show us the evidence? Any rational person should have "low confidence" in what they claim.

 

[bripat9643]

The Russians interfred? SO? Very himself stated that other foreign Nations attempt to hack the United States all the time. He knew this was going on by several Nations while he was President yet did nothing.

The Democrats are being requested to turn over their server that they claimed was hacked by the Russians so their claim can be verified... but they refuse to turn over the.

The Russians attempting to interfere or hack our elections has nothing to do with Donald Trump.

No crime, no criminal activity, no collusion, no evidence, no obstruction, no case...

The reason the Democrats are trying they're fake story in the media is because they have nothing to take to a Judicial hearing.

They are spoiled, criminal children who lost an election and cannot mentally deal with it.

But you don't mind that a foreign despot like Putin helped steal the election, right?

When you can produce some actual evidence of that, perhaps we might worry about it.

 

[radical right]

Nevertheless, the left (douche bags like you) has been saying the CIA are murderers and criminals ever since the 1960s. But now anyone who questions their claims is a traitor?

We don't trust the CIA. But when the CIA is peer reviewed by the other 17 intelligence agencies, we trust the government intelligence structure as a whole, even if it includes the CIA.

Just like we don't trust any single branch of government, but have confidence when they're checked by the other two branches.

 

[radical right]

They have "high confidence," but they can't show us the evidence? Any rational person should have "low confidence" in what they claim.

You want to see the evidence, Get an above top secret security clearance. Until then it just proves you can't be trusted to see the evidence.

 

[radical right]

When you can produce some actual evidence of that, perhaps we might worry about it.

Come to CIA headquarters, ask for agent 8433599 to show you the NSA's "other side" file

 

[bripat9643]

Nevertheless, the left (douche bags like you) has been saying the CIA are murderers and criminals ever since the 1960s. But now anyone who questions their claims is a traitor?

We don't trust the CIA. But when the CIA is peer reviewed by the other 17 intelligence agencies, we trust the government intelligence structure as a whole, even if it includes the CIA.

Just like we don't trust any single branch of government, but have confidence when they're checked by the other two branches.

If you don't trust the CIA then you're a filthy traitor! Isn't that what all you douche bags have been saying since the election?

Furthermore, the CIA wasn't "peer reviewed" by anyone.

 

[bripat9643]

When you can produce some actual evidence of that, perhaps we might worry about it.

Come to CIA headquarters, ask for agent 8433599 to show you the NSA's "other side" file

Once again, no evidence.

 

[radical right]

If you don't trust the CIA then you're a filthy traitor! Isn't that what all you douche bags have been saying since the election?.

Gerald Ford didn't trust the CIA, and he was on the Warren commisson. Which is why he wrote an executive order putting controls on the CIA.

 

[radical right]

[
Furthermore, the CIA wasn't "peer reviewed" by anyone.

Actually the CIA was directly reviewed by the DNI, who had it reviewed by the NSA, DHS, FBI, and the other 17 intelligence agencies. It's official DNI policy put in place after 2003 by Clapper.

 

[radical right]

Once again, no evidence.

There is no evidence any of our atomic bombs contain anything but used pinball machine parts.

 

[easyt65]

Conspiracy theory, fake news, lies....that's all snowflakes live for anymore...

No crime.
No criminal activity.
No collusion
No evidence
No obstruction
No server turned in

Time for snowflakes to embrace reality...

Trump whipped Hillary's ass.
Trump is the President.
Hillary is the worst candidate in US hostory

 

[radical right]

Conspiracy theory, fake news, lies....that's all snowflakes live for anymore...

No crime.
No criminal activity.
No collusion
No evidence
No obstruction
No server turned in

Time for snowflakes to embrace reality...

Trump whipped Hillary's ass.
Trump is the President.
Hillary is the worst candidate in US hostory

Lavarov said "move on":.

Trump accepted Putin's denial. It's over, "move on"

 

[bripat9643]

If you don't trust the CIA then you're a filthy traitor! Isn't that what all you douche bags have been saying since the election?.

Gerald Ford didn't trust the CIA, and he was on the Warren commisson. Which is why he wrote an executive order putting controls on the CIA.

That doesn't alter the fact that you and the rest of the snowflakes have been saying that anyone who questions the veracity of the CIA is a traitor.

 

[bripat9643]

Once again, no evidence.

There is no evidence any of our atomic bombs contain anything but used pinball machine parts.

There's plenty of evidence indicating they contain fissile material in a configuration what will blow your ass to kingdom come.

 

[bripat9643]

[
Furthermore, the CIA wasn't "peer reviewed" by anyone.

Actually the CIA was directly reviewed by the DNI, who had it reviewed by the NSA, DHS, FBI, and the other 17 intelligence agencies. It's official DNI policy put in place after 2003 by Clapper.

Bullshit.

 

[radical right]

Gerald Ford didn't trust the CIA, and he was on the Warren commisson. Which is why he wrote an executive order putting controls on the CIA.

That doesn't alter the fact that you and the rest of the snowflakes have been saying that anyone who questions the veracity of the CIA is a traitor.

No we're saying anybody who questions the veracity of the 17 us intelligence agencies is a traitor.

We question any single agency, but when they're peer reviewed by the entire intelligence community, we trust them completely.