CIA Concludes Russia Interfered In Election To Help Trump Win

[easyt65]

Conspiracy theory, fake news, lies....that's all snowflakes live for anymore...

No crime.
No criminal activity.
No collusion
No evidence
No obstruction
No server turned in

Time for snowflakes to embrace reality...

Trump whipped Hillary's ass.
Trump is the President.
Hillary is the worst candidate in US hostory

Lavarov said "move on":.

Trump accepted Putin's denial. It's over, "move on"

Did you teally expect the e,-KGB President to break down and admit anything?

REALLY?

 

[radical right]

There is no evidence any of our atomic bombs contain anything but used pinball machine parts.

There's plenty of evidence indicating they contain fissile material in a configuration what will blow your ass to kingdom come.

So post evidence there's actually fissile material in them.

 

[radical right]

Lavarov said "move on":.

Trump accepted Putin's denial. It's over, "move on"

Did you teally expect the e,-KGB President to break down and admit anything?

REALLY?

I didn't expect Trump to let Lavrov say he accepted Putin's denial. Unless Trump actually accepted Putin's denial.

 

[bripat9643]

Gerald Ford didn't trust the CIA, and he was on the Warren commisson. Which is why he wrote an executive order putting controls on the CIA.

That doesn't alter the fact that you and the rest of the snowflakes have been saying that anyone who questions the veracity of the CIA is a traitor.

No we're saying anybody who questions the veracity of the 17 us intelligence agencies is a traitor.

We question any single agency, but when they're peer reviewed by the entire intelligence community, we trust them completely.

ROFL! So you can question one, but if you question all 17 then you're a traitor? Really? Is that the special logic you apply to this situation?

BTW, moron, all 17 agencies didn't comment on the "evidence." Only four did, so that's another snowflake lie.

 

[bripat9643]

There is no evidence any of our atomic bombs contain anything but used pinball machine parts.

There's plenty of evidence indicating they contain fissile material in a configuration what will blow your ass to kingdom come.

So post evidence there's actually fissile material in them.

 

[radical right]

ROFL! So you can question one, but if you question all 17 then you're a traitor? Really? Is that the special logic you apply to this situation?

The same way you don't trust the two senators from california, but you trust the 100 senators as a whole, because the other 98 'peer review' the two from California.

It's all a matter of trusting the body, like the USSC, even if you don't any any individual judge. I didn't trust Scalia, but I trusted the USSC.

Thousands more examples where 'peer review' wins trust.

 

[radical right]

So post evidence there's actually fissile material in them.

You have to be joking those photo's are from the 1960's and 1980's. Post anything that isn't a quarter century out of date.

They took the fissile material out of our nukes a quarter century ago under a secret deal with the russians to tear down the berlin wall.

That's why we're so afraid of N. Korea, who actually have nukes that can go boom.

 

[bripat9643]

ROFL! So you can question one, but if you question all 17 then you're a traitor? Really? Is that the special logic you apply to this situation?

The same way you don't trust the two senators from california, but you trust the 100 senators as a whole, because the other 98 'peer review' the two from California.

It's all a matter of trusting the body, like the USSC, even if you don't any any individual judge. I didn't trust Scalia, but I trusted the USSC.

Thousands more examples where 'peer review' wins trust.

ROFL! Why would anyone trust the Senate? I fear for my life savings every time they convene a session. Your premise is false, so your conclusion is false.

 

[bripat9643]

So post evidence there's actually fissile material in them.

You have to be joking those photo's are from the 1960's and 1980's. Post anything that isn't a quarter century out of date.

Hmmm, you said there was no evidence. I posted some evidence, not iron clad irrefutable proof. The later probably isn't possible.

 

[radical right]

You have to be joking those photo's are from the 1960's and 1980's. Post anything that isn't a quarter century out of date.

Hmmm, you said there was no evidence. I posted some evidence, not iron clad irrefutable proof. The later probably isn't possible.

That's evidence we used to have nukes that had fissile material in them. Post something to prove we didn't give all our fissile material to the russians, in return for them taking down the Berlin wall.

Why do you think Putin isn't afraid of Trump. He knows about the deal, and that our nukes are just hollow shells.

Prove me wrong. Post proof, our nukes still work. Something within the last 20 years.

 

[bripat9643]

You have to be joking those photo's are from the 1960's and 1980's. Post anything that isn't a quarter century out of date.

Hmmm, you said there was no evidence. I posted some evidence, not iron clad irrefutable proof. The later probably isn't possible.

That's evidence we used to have nukes that had fissile material in them. Post something to prove we didn't give all our fissile material to the russians, in return for them taking down the Berlin wall.

It's evidence that we still have nukes, moron, it's just not ironclad irrefutable proof. You said there was NO EVIDENCE. You're an idiot, of course.

 

[The Original Tree]

Secret Assessment?

LMFAO!

How the **** are we reading about it?

Lakota is drinking the firewater again! Tell The CIA to STFU and sit down.

Until I see evidence the OP can STFU too!

 

[bripat9643]

Secret Assessment?

LMFAO!

How the **** are we reading about it?

Lakota is drinking the firewater again!

All the Russian conspiracy theorists are drinking something much stronger than firewater.

 

[radical right]

That's evidence we used to have nukes that had fissile material in them. Post something to prove we didn't give all our fissile material to the russians, in return for them taking down the Berlin wall.

It's evidence that we still have nukes, moron, it's just not ironclad irrefutable proof. You said there was NO EVIDENCE. You're an idiot, of course.

Our nukes are empty shells. That's why they haven't tested one in over 20 years, because we can't test empty shells.

 

[bripat9643]

That's evidence we used to have nukes that had fissile material in them. Post something to prove we didn't give all our fissile material to the russians, in return for them taking down the Berlin wall.

It's evidence that we still have nukes, moron, it's just not ironclad irrefutable proof. You said there was NO EVIDENCE. You're an idiot, of course.

Our nukes are empty shells. That's why they haven't tested one in over 20 years, because we can't test empty shells.

They aren't being tested because that dumbass Clinton agreed not to test them.

 

[The Original Tree]

Like I keep saying. Greatest most entertaining political year of my life.

The Left is being exposed as some kind of Fanatical Demonic Group of Pathological Liars and Enemies of Democracy and America.

And we get to punish them every day!

Life is good!

Secret Assessment?

LMFAO!

How the **** are we reading about it?

Lakota is drinking the firewater again!

All the Russian conspiracy theorists are drinking something much stronger than firewater.

 

[radical right]

Our nukes are empty shells. That's why they haven't tested one in over 20 years, because we can't test empty shells.

They aren't being tested because that dumbass Clinton agreed not to test them.

Clinton isn't president. And our nukes don't have any fissile material in them. Why didn't anybody test if they still work. Because they know they don't They're empty shells. Bush knew it.

 

[bripat9643]

Our nukes are empty shells. That's why they haven't tested one in over 20 years, because we can't test empty shells.

They aren't being tested because that dumbass Clinton agreed not to test them.

Clinton isn't president. And our nukes don't have any fissile material in them. Why didn't anybody test they still work. Because they know they don't They're empty shells. Bush knew it.

Smartest thing you ever posted.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

That Was Easy: Putin Says He Convinced Trump That Russia Didn’t Meddle In 2016 Election

Trump can pretend to be a strongman all he wants, but in his first real opportunity to put America first and show strong leadership, he backed down bigly.…

 

[radical right]

And our nukes don't have any fissile material in them. Why didn't anybody test they still work. Because they know they don't They're empty shells. Bush knew it.

Smartest thing you ever posted.

YUP.