CIA Concludes Russia Interfered In Election To Help Trump Win

Trump is asking in a tweet why this wasn't brought up before the election.

IT WAS! Repeatedly.

In fact, Trump begged Russia to hack Clinton's emails.

And now Putin's propaganda mills get to brag that Donald Trump, their President of the US, is taking Russia's side and going against the US.

Trump is Putin's *****. And Trump's Chumps are Putin's useful idiots.

This must be what Trump meant when he said we would get tired of winning.


21jrw50.jpg
 
2002. Wasn't it through the CIA the bogus intel on WMD reached Cheney's office? So, for starters, Saddam Hussein.
The CIA and other agencies collect data. It's up to elected and appointed leaders to determine what to do with it.

Example; it wasn't the CIA's decision to invade Iraq or choose to simply carpet bomb all of Saddam's non-compliant "palaces". They simply presented what they have up through the chain of command. It's ultimately up to the CiC to make a decision as to what action to take, if any. In some cases, such as Iraq, the CiC can go to Congress and ask for their support. While much of data was classified, Congressional armed services and intelligence committees had the same data the President had.
If I remember correctly there were differing opinions within the CIA as to the authenticity of the "evidence" the CIA was relying on. Other US intel agencies as well as MI6 and the French intel were vehemently warning against the veracity of the evidence which was provided by a lone paid informant --Iraqi, I believe, but a disreputable toady. He was promised a big payout and ferried with his family to somewhere, no doubt, in the US .

All the voices raised against it said it was manufactured by Mossad. Mossad, btw, was of the opnion that the evidence was true as shit. This is the evidence Paul Wolfowitz, Doug Feith, and Richard Perle (all three militant Zionists, and two of whom were dual US-Israeli citizens, and I think one was even a former member of the Israeli Knesset) used to launch the war from Dick Cheney's Pentagon office, with Thomas "Cakewalk" Friedman, et al, cheering the way. These three, with an empty-headed US president blinking stupidly in tow, successfully launched the mighty American war machine against a puny country with an economy 1/10th the size of Denmark's that posed zero threat to us.

Four million Iraqis (two thirds of a Holocaust!!) subsequently perished, which ruffled some feathers. The hypersensitive Iraqis then formed ISIS and the horror show that that is. Yaaay, Mossad!!! When a duped Colin Powell went before the UN and made the US case for war based on the Israeli bullshit, the French ambassador to the UN committed the extreme breach of diplomatic protocol by holding a press conference in front of the UN right during Powell's speech. He begged us not to fall for this Israeli trick. For some reason, the US media forgot to cover the French ambassador's speech. But Colin Powell got wall-to-wall coverage along with effusive editorial references to Powell's majestic integrity and the awe-inspiring dignity and respect all the world held him in. (Since then, of course, he's finished).

Who wants to bet that the same wing in the CIA is the source of the "evidence" Russia runs our elections?
Hindsight is 20/20. All the CIA or other intelligence agencies can do is collect the data, verify it the best they can and then present it up the chain of command.

Consider the intell going around prior to 9/11; reports of foreigners wanting to learn how to fly but not learn how to takeoff and land. Saudis who are on expired visas (like most illegals). Intell on various hijacking plots and a desire to attack the West by al-Qaeda. Looking back, we can connect the dots, but when all of that intell is buried among dozens, if not hundreds, of other reports about chemical attacks, bombs and other threats, it's difficult to see through all that fog.

The same goes with Iraq. There was intell coming out of there, but it was limited. It's not up to the FBI or CIA to make those decisions. It's their job to collect and assemble the intell for presentation. If asked what they think, they'll answer, but it's still a command decision, ultimately, by the CiC.
So the two agencies don't agree here! You understand that right?
 
Trump is asking in a tweet why this wasn't brought up before the election.

IT WAS! Repeatedly.

In fact, Trump begged Russia to hack Clinton's emails.

And now Putin's propaganda mills get to brag that Donald Trump, their President of the US, is taking Russia's side and going against the US.

Trump is Putin's *****. And Trump's Chumps are Putin's useful idiots.

This must be what Trump meant when he said we would get tired of winning.


21jrw50.jpg
Then why is it news today?
 
Trump is asking in a tweet why this wasn't brought up before the election.

IT WAS! Repeatedly.

In fact, Trump begged Russia to hack Clinton's emails.

And now Putin's propaganda mills get to brag that Donald Trump, their President of the US, is taking Russia's side and going against the US.

Trump is Putin's *****. And Trump's Chumps are Putin's useful idiots.

This must be what Trump meant when he said we would get tired of winning.


21jrw50.jpg
Then why is it news today?
It is news today that Trump is taking Putin's side against America, retard.

It's been in the news for some time that Russia hacked our election. What cave have you been living in?
 
Assange says it was not Russia
OK, then will you ask Mr. Assange why not one email of Trump's was released? (maybe that's what he's telling us?)

Thanks!

You know, come to think of it, if there were more intelligent forces at work, they surely would've released a number of more benign emails of Trump's just to make it look like the dump was fair. But since it was so utterly lop-sided and such an obvious smear....it screams "juvenile"..foolish...not even sophomoric...more like freshmen in Jr. High. In other words, it smells like Trump all-around.
 
Hey numbnuts the U.S. had a defector Iraqi scientist that SAID they had WMDs. They didn't fabricate that. The guy only said after the fact that he lied.
View attachment 101742

Look, I did not point out that there is only 'INTEL', not 'bogus' Intel. I was also not the one to point out that politicians do not collect Intel, they just act on what they are given. That argument just KILLED years of Liberals attacking Bush.

The CIA said Hussein had WMD.
- He either did or did not.

The scientist said Hussein had WMD, and it was up to the CIA and Intel to investigate and then provide the report to Bush.
- Bush, as pointed out by OTHERS, then acted based on the Intel he was given, as did Hillary and Liberals when they voted to give Bush the authority to take the country to war. (These liberals not only voted for it but argued that Hussein needed to be removed.)

Now back to the CIA...NOW - they now claim the Russians hacked the elections. IF the CIA was wrong 'then' who is to say they are right now?
- I don't know because we have seen no evidence, just been asked to take Hillary, Barry, and the CIA's word for it.

IF they are right and the Russians hacked the elections, forget Trump - what is the PRESIDENT going to do about it?

What can the President do about it? Nothing other than what he already did, which is to order a full investigation of it. Then it is up to the other channels to do their duty. The only people in all of the federal government that can rule to have another election is the Supreme Court.
 
FAIL and a deliberate attempt to distort the truth since you cut out the post chain where I specifically said "Start with 1980 and bring me up to date regarding your accusation that the CIA assassinates leaders like Trump." Why did you do this? Because you're a liar? To blow smoke? In order to keep pushing your anti-American/pro-Russian agenda?
Maybe you can't read very well.

Sheikh Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah
Nine commandants of the Sandinista National Directorate
Miguel d'Escoto
Gen. Ahmed Dlimi
Ayatollah Khomeini
Muammar Qaddafi
General Omar Torrijos

….. were all assassinated or attempted assassinated by the CIA after 1980. You need to learn how to read.
 
Trump is asking in a tweet why this wasn't brought up before the election.

IT WAS! Repeatedly.

In fact, Trump begged Russia to hack Clinton's emails.

And now Putin's propaganda mills get to brag that Donald Trump, their President of the US, is taking Russia's side and going against the US.

Trump is Putin's *****. And Trump's Chumps are Putin's useful idiots.

This must be what Trump meant when he said we would get tired of winning.


21jrw50.jpg
Then why is it news today?
It is news today that Trump is taking Putin's side against America, retard.

It's been in the news for some time that Russia hacked our election. What cave have you been living in?
He is?

By the way, why is the stock market up so high if that was indeed true?

My god what kind of stupid to you walk around with by the way?
 
Last edited:
Nothing wrong with investigating, as long as it's about protecting America from threats and not a particular political party from future embarrassment.

Also, if Russia or China is hacking and spying on America they need to be rewarded in kind. You don't allow a nation to send jets over to attack you without paying a price and you can't allow a foreign government to attack you in cyberspace without paying a steep price. They go at you, you pay them back ten fold.
 
The NSA KNOWS who did the hacking. It is very likely they have told Big Ears who the hackers are...but Big Ears is not interested in the truth he wants to harm Trump and the Russians.

Snowden and Binney know the truth and have spoken out, but it is funny (really typical) of the lib MSM to put out fake news and ignore the truth.


How To INSTANTLY Tell If Russia Hacked the Election
Posted on December 10, 2016 by WashingtonsBlog
Specifically, Edward Snowden says the NSA could easily determine who hacked the Democratic National Committee’s emails:

25 Jul
Edward Snowden

✔ @Snowden

Even if the attackers try to obfuscate origin, #XKEYSCORE makes following exfiltrated data easy. I did this personally against Chinese ops.


Follow
Edward Snowden

✔@Snowden

Evidence that could publicly attribute responsibility for the DNC hack certainly exists at #NSA, but DNI traditionally objects to sharing.

10:03 AM - 25 Jul 2016


But don’t trust Snowden …

The NSA executive who created the agency’s mass surveillance program for digital information, who served as the senior technical director within the agency, who managed six thousand NSA employees, the 36-year NSA veteran widely regarded as a “legend” within the agency and the NSA’s best-ever analyst and code-breaker, who mapped out the Soviet command-and-control structure before anyone else knew how, and so predicted Soviet invasions before they happened (“in the 1970s, he decrypted the Soviet Union’s command system, which provided the US and its allies with real-time surveillance of all Soviet troop movements and Russian atomic weapons”) – confirmed to Washington’s Blog that the NSA would definitely know who the hacker was.

Binney told Washington’s Blog in July:

Snowden is right and the MSM is clueless.

***

Do they have evidence that the Russians downloaded and later forwarded those emails to wikileaks? Seems to me that they need to answer those questions to be sure that their assertion is correct.

***

You can tell from the network log who is going into a site. I used that on networks that I had. I looked to see who came into my LAN, where they went, how long they stayed and what they did while in my network.

Further, if you needed to, you could trace back approaches through other servers etc. Trace Route and Trace Watch are good examples of monitoring software that help do these things. Others of course exist … probably the best are in NSA/GCHQ and the other Five Eyes countries. But, these countries have no monopoly on smart people that could do similar detection software.

In October, Binney told us:

If the idiots in the intelligence community expect us to believe them after all the crap they have told us (like WMD’s in Iraq and “no we don’t collect data on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans”) then they need to give clear proof of what they say. So far, they have failed to prove anything.

Which suggests they don’t have proof and just want to war monger the US public into a second cold war with the Russians.

After all, there’s lots and lots of money in that for the military-industrial-intelligence-governmental complex of incestuous relationships.

***
 
This is a waste of time, and just more of the scared establishment trying to de-legitimize President Trump before he takes office.
There is zero evidence that Russia interfered with our elections and I challenge anyone to show any evidence that they did.
There is none.
This is like the 4th thread I have seen on this. You will get the same answer lefty.
Donald Trump is president.
Neither Hillary Clinton, Jill Stein, or The Russians are going to change that for you.
 
Stump will never speak ill of Putin. He will lift the sanctions to allow Russia to advance militarily into east Europe and beyond. You nutcases have elected a Russian agent.
 
15th post
Hey numbnuts the U.S. had a defector Iraqi scientist that SAID they had WMDs. They didn't fabricate that. The guy only said after the fact that he lied.
View attachment 101742

Look, I did not point out that there is only 'INTEL', not 'bogus' Intel. I was also not the one to point out that politicians do not collect Intel, they just act on what they are given. That argument just KILLED years of Liberals attacking Bush.

The CIA said Hussein had WMD.
- He either did or did not.

The scientist said Hussein had WMD, and it was up to the CIA and Intel to investigate and then provide the report to Bush.
- Bush, as pointed out by OTHERS, then acted based on the Intel he was given, as did Hillary and Liberals when they voted to give Bush the authority to take the country to war. (These liberals not only voted for it but argued that Hussein needed to be removed.)

Now back to the CIA...NOW - they now claim the Russians hacked the elections. IF the CIA was wrong 'then' who is to say they are right now?
- I don't know because we have seen no evidence, just been asked to take Hillary, Barry, and the CIA's word for it.

IF they are right and the Russians hacked the elections, forget Trump - what is the PRESIDENT going to do about it?

What can the President do about it? Nothing other than what he already did, which is to order a full investigation of it. Then it is up to the other channels to do their duty. The only people in all of the federal government that can rule to have another election is the Supreme Court.
Why didn't Obamas intelligence agencies catch him red-handed? Are they sleeping on the job?
 
This is a waste of time, and just more of the scared establishment trying to de-legitimize President Trump before he takes office.
There is zero evidence that Russia interfered with our elections and I challenge anyone to show any evidence that they did.
There is none.
This is like the 4th thread I have seen on this. You will get the same answer lefty.
Donald Trump is president.
Neither Hillary Clinton, Jill Stein, or The Russians are going to change that for you.

MORE FAKE NEWS FROM THE RWers. Thanks for playing. Now go home. Putin has the lights on for you.
 
Investigate the shit out of it. I don't think Putin will get anymore than a slap on the wrist by a possible extension of sanctions by the US, but I doubt many would join.
 
Who cares about the Russian hacking? Who gives a ****?

Liberal crybabies who lost. They're trying everything in the book.

Court can kick out trump and elect Clinton! FAITHLESS ELECTORS!!

JESUS CHRIST! HARRIET TUBMAN! SOMEBODY SAVE US!

Get wrecked liberals, the United States has rejected SJW bullshit. Trump is not a racist, Trump is not a bigot or a misogynist. If Clinton won, liberals wouldn't have given one ounce of a **** about Russian hacking.

the modern day left is just crazy lunatics who have rejected Americanism for identity politics and social nazism, forcing everyone to accept their twisted lifestyles or be labelled a 'homophobe', 'bigot', 'sexist' and all kinds of isms unheard of since the dark days of communist rule.

Trump got elected because America rejects this bullshit ideology that somehow a gay person has more a right to have a wedding cake than a Christian has a right to their beliefs.
 
Back
Top Bottom