You do realize, don't you, that "science" cannot ever either prove or disprove God? Science depends on cause and effect, achieving the same results under the same circumstances, IOW, repeatability. God is a sovereign being and not an ATM. You cannot simply press the right buttons in the right sequence and have the goodies fall out. When you stop trying to shoehorn God into a "science" box, you can start to get somewhere.
See, the problem atheists have, despite claims to the contrary, is they really don't WANT proof that God exists. I have yet to meet an atheist who states that he/she will submit their lives to God if only they get enough proof that they can't ultimately deny. No, the ones I've run into, when pressed, admit that they have no intention of submitting to God even after they see proof. Therefore, why should God "do a trick" to convince them He exists when they will only continue to rebel? So, no, there's no point in "debating" atheists about the existence of God.
Atheists don't seem to realize that, while they condemn Christians for believing what someone else tells them about God, they are at the same time believing when someone else tells them God doesn't exist.
When someone is honestly seeking to know if God exists and is willing to accept His lordship, God reveals Himself.