Yet you are standing with a political movement that is hostile to those who's faith you claim to share.
My point stands.
And your Logical Fallacy of Proof by Ridicule is noted. As evidence you are an ass and a loser.
lol.... your point does not stand. my belief is not of the hypocritical type that the GOP & their fundy filth has enveloped.
There is nothing hypocritical about voting against a leader of a movement that is deeply hostile to you, even if the man you are voting for is twice divorced.
YOur point fails. As do you.
it goes waaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyy beyond being twice divorced, nitwit.
your president:
is a serial cheater
Agreed.
& a gambler
Agreed.
has had a long history with the playboy empire
Agreed.
has gone on howard stern many MANY times & has indulged himself with everything that has to do with THAT
Agreed.
he tried to steal an old woman's home thru eminent domain , pave it over so he can have a parking lot for his casino
Agreed.
...so much for being charged by god to be good stewards of the earth like the good 'christian' man he is..
YOur assumption that some one disagreeing with you on policy is immoral, is just you being, a smug and pompous liberal.
you :
are being a ridiculous little man.
No, my point stands. Trump was not a good choice for the Evangelical Christians, but he was far better than someone who is actively opposed to them, ie Hillary THe Vile.
It makes complete sense that they did not back him, until he was the better choice of what was left standing.
That is my point, and you have failed to address it at all.
he is not a christian by any means. he was immoral for his entire life. & those that profess to be christians, have sold their souls for a few more bucks in their pocket. you make me laugh.
Yeah, you said that. I responded, and addressed it.
Now you just repeated yourself.
THat's the Logical Fallacy of Proof by Assertion,
which is A. an admission that you can't refute anything I said and B. you being an ass.
Thus my point stands as the final word.
Trump was not a good choice for the Evangelical Christians, but he was far better than someone who is actively opposed to them, ie Hillary THe Vile.
It makes complete sense that they did not back him, until he was the better choice of what was left standing.