Libs just don't have a code of conduct so there is no depth that one can sink too and it not be defending by the most vile.
damn, the more I'm exposed to you people, the more shocked I am to learn that you can tolerate each other long enough to breed.
The youthful radicals propelled a new set of values from the fringes to the midst of contemporary social conflict. Rothman and Lichter, Roots of Radicalism: Jews, Christians, and the New Left, p. 392-394
Thus the themes and traits of the New Left have become prominent in todays culture, and everything has become, ultimately, political. The result of the politicization of the culture is that ones opponents are not merely wrong, but are morally evil, and, therefore, one may wish every affliction to befall them.
a. Campus rioters did not merely criticize universities as being in need of reform, but, rather, as institutions rotten with immorality from top to bottom.
b. Critics of the Obama Healthcare plan were not just mistaken, but were tools of greedy pharmaceutical and insurance companies, or doctors out to protect their illicit profits.
c. A constituent of the difficulty in dealing with the radicals, and the New Left value system, was the habitual lying. This antinomianism has resulted in the acceptance of lying by both omission and by commission, as it depends upon what the meaning of is is.
d. So student radicals, imbued with the political grace of the Left, were also freed of the restraints of morality, specifically honesty: one could lie in a noble cause.
e. We can see the same religious absolution in Sorels belief that it was not wrong to break heads as well as laws.
f. Modern liberals no longer have to break heads, as they control many of the institutions they once attacked, but lie they must, and do, as they could not get elected advertising their actual agenda.
And they throw cameras?