Oh..I see..you don't belive in the Constitution or state rights. YOUR nuts. Lol.
Constitution? You dare speak about the Constitution when you are doing your best to destroy the first amendment?
The people are the only censors of their governors: and even their errors will tend to keep these to the true principles of their institution. To punish these errors too severely would be to suppress the only safeguard of the public liberty. The way to prevent these irregular interpositions of the people is to give them full information of their affairs thro’ the channel of the public papers, & to contrive that those papers should penetrate the whole mass of the people. The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. But I should mean that every man should receive those papers & be capable of reading them.
Thomas Jefferson
That criminal seeking to represent Montana in the House committed assault in an attempt to shut up the press.
Liberals are trying to destroy the Constitution by trying to overturn a democratic election and overthrow our government.
1. It wasn't democratic. The loser won. 2. Turning the insane out of public office is not overthrowing the government. The process for such a thing was written down in - the Constitution.
Flunked civics too? Are we seeing a trend here when liberal democrats do not understand the electoral process?
Maybe that is why they are getting so great at losing!
Civics should have taught you that in an actual democratic election, the majority wins. In the case of Trump, the minority won. That is undemocratic.
well perhaps you didn't listen when they discussed presidential elections. oops. The democratic vote is per state for an electoric. here:
United States presidential election - Wikipedia
"The Electoral College and its procedure is established in the
U.S. Constitution by
Article II, Section 1, Clauses 2 and 4; and the
Twelfth Amendment (which replaced Clause 3 after its ratification in 1804). Under Clause 2, each of the states casts as many electoral votes as the total number of its
Senators and
Representatives in
Congress, while, per the
Twenty-third Amendment ratified in 1961, Washington, D.C. casts the same number of electoral votes as the least-represented state, which is three. Also under Clause 2, the manner for choosing electors is determined by each
state legislature, not directly by the federal government. Many state legislatures used to select their electors directly, but over time all of them switched to using the
popular vote to help determine electors. Once chosen, electors will generally cast their electoral votes for the candidate who won the
plurality in their state, but at least 21 states do not have provisions that specifically address or punish "
faithless electors" and "
unpledged electors", those who vote against the plurality decision of their state.
[1] In modern times, faithless and unpledged electors have not affected the ultimate outcome of an election, thus the results can generally be determined based on the state-by-state popular vote."
And the majority were for Trump. oops. you're welcome.