Chick-fil-A to halt Salvation Army, FCA donations after LGBTQ protests

[Tommy Tainant]

If it's a Catholic priest though, well we can overlook that.

Public education has a far worst record... let's go there

I'll wax you to a high sheen. Save yourself and sit down

Far worse? We really have no idea whether it does or not as the Catholic Church kept it hidden for so long and really, still refuses to address it.

Yeah we do moron. The US Department Of Education did a study. A child is 100 times more likely to be abused in by public education personell than by a priest.

You're sailing into threads uninformed again

You keep spewing this shite but you have been schooled on this many times. There are no surveys supporting your idiocy.

No I haven't you fat ***.

Here's a clue for you ya fat ****, you're a ******, Muslim loving asshole and in some little worthless "nation" promoting homosexually. Sit the **** down

Well I always welcome your loving Christian views and I am pleased that you have walked away from your falsehood.

 

[Mac-7]

To say that marriage is only between a man and a woman is considered hateful bigotry in lib la la land?

thats insane

It is fine to say "according to my god, marriage is only between a man and a woman"

The problem comes when you try and force others to follow those religious views.

We are not a theocracy.

Then again, the government has no business being in the marriage business to start with.

Even atheists like those in the old soviet union only recognized traditional marriage
Traditional marriage is just an almost universal common sense standard

Traditional marriage like that of Kind David and King Solomon and the patriarchs of the Old Testament?

In the Old Testament sexual morals were different that the New Testiment

But in either case it was always men marrying only women

 

[Mac-7]

I dont think so

I sense they are caving to militant homosexual pressure

Wrong.

It's a response to hateful bigotry against gay Americans, this thread premise being one such example.

To say that marriage is only between a man and a woman is considered hateful bigotry in lib la la land?

thats insane

If you said "marriage is only be between a white man and a white woman", is that considered hateful bigotry?

That would be a political position not a biblical one

Nope, sorry...wrong again. The anti miscegenation bigots have biblical arguments just like anti gay marriage bigots.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion

Put two godless lawyers in the same room and they will argue and disagree

So if you managed to find a Christian who prefers racial purity dont blame that on the Bible

 

[Mac-7]

It is fine to say "according to my god, marriage is only between a man and a woman"

The problem comes when you try and force others to follow those religious views.

We are not a theocracy.

Then again, the government has no business being in the marriage business to start with.

The flip side is gays trying to force their views and acceptance

I see your point but the reality is there are two sides of the coin

Such as trying to force a Christian baker out of business

Except nobody wants to force anyone out of business...as long as you follow local laws and ordinances.

The Christian baker does not accept homosexual marriage and refuses to take part in the ceremony

Why doesn’t the racist bigot get the same legal carve out?

Mainly because society makes exceptions for minorities based on skin color that they have no control over

Gays choose to boink other men

 

[Mac-7]

I was not speaking to you.
Though the bible does say they should not speak in church nor ask questions and that they are in subjection to men.

Any general attack on Christians concerns me

Christians bring much upon themselves, especially those in this country.

But take heart, they are told to rejoice in such things...you should take that to heart

Gays bring much upon themselves also... targeting Christian businesses, faux hate crimes, etc.

The worst crime is gays targeting children

That cannot be overlooked

Gays don’t target children, pedophiles do...and most of them are self described heterosexual men.

Men who target boys are homosexual pedophiles

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The flip side is gays trying to force their views and acceptance

I see your point but the reality is there are two sides of the coin

Such as trying to force a Christian baker out of business

Except nobody wants to force anyone out of business...as long as you follow local laws and ordinances.

The Christian baker does not accept homosexual marriage and refuses to take part in the ceremony

Why doesn’t the racist bigot get the same legal carve out?

Mainly because society makes exceptions for minorities based on skin color that they have no control over

Gays choose to boink other men

Do you remember when you made the choice of women over men? Was it a difficult decision?

 

[Mac-7]

Chick-fil-A to halt Salvation Army, FCA donations after LGBTQ protests

Chick-fil-A will stop all donations to the Salvation Army and the Fellowship of Christian Athletes next year, its CEO announced Monday.

The decision comes after years of criticism from LGBTQ and human rights groups regarding Chick-fil-A’s donations to the nonprofits in light of their positions on same-sex marriage.

I predict Chick-Fil-A will regret this decision

There are more traditional marriage people in America than sexual perverts

Which the company should remember since the biggest sales day in its history happened when homosexuals staged an organized boycott and protest

But it backfired as millions of people crowded the stores nationwide to show support for normal sexual values

Did you know that heterosexuals support the gay community too?

Did you know that heterosexuals who have no problem with gay people out number you backward people who are afraid of anyone who isn't like you.

I have never been to a chick fill a. I don't eat deep fried food. I do support their new policy on who they donate to.

I think there are different shades of tolerance for homosexual perversion

Some are fully supportive of homosexuality as a way to undermine American society

While others just feel sorry for men and women that choose to be different

But the number of people who totally disagree with homosexuality in all forms is very high also

 

[Mac-7]

Chick-fil-A to halt Salvation Army, FCA donations after LGBTQ protests

Chick-fil-A will stop all donations to the Salvation Army and the Fellowship of Christian Athletes next year, its CEO announced Monday.

The decision comes after years of criticism from LGBTQ and human rights groups regarding Chick-fil-A’s donations to the nonprofits in light of their positions on same-sex marriage.

I predict Chick-Fil-A will regret this decision

There are more traditional marriage people in America than sexual perverts

Which the company should remember since the biggest sales day in its history happened when homosexuals staged an organized boycott and protest

But it backfired as millions of people crowded the stores nationwide to show support for normal sexual values

I predict nobody but a few religious nut jobs will give a ****.

Really? So, when did the meteoric rise begin for Chick-fil-a? What precipitated it, Comrade?

That was millions of Americans who believe marriage should be between a man and a woman only that liberals claim dont exist

 

[Mac-7]

Such as trying to force a Christian baker out of business

Except nobody wants to force anyone out of business...as long as you follow local laws and ordinances.

The Christian baker does not accept homosexual marriage and refuses to take part in the ceremony

Why doesn’t the racist bigot get the same legal carve out?

Mainly because society makes exceptions for minorities based on skin color that they have no control over

Gays choose to boink other men

Do you remember when you made the choice of women over men? Was it a difficult decision?

I never thought about or even knew there were homosexuals when I was a child

Now the schools make it a subject for children even before kindergarten

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Except nobody wants to force anyone out of business...as long as you follow local laws and ordinances.

The Christian baker does not accept homosexual marriage and refuses to take part in the ceremony

Why doesn’t the racist bigot get the same legal carve out?

Mainly because society makes exceptions for minorities based on skin color that they have no control over

Gays choose to boink other men

Do you remember when you made the choice of women over men? Was it a difficult decision?

I never thought about or even knew there were homosexuals when I was a child

Now the schools make it a subject for children even before kindergarten

You did not answer the question...when did you choose women over men? Did you try both before choosing?

 

[Mac-7]

The Christian baker does not accept homosexual marriage and refuses to take part in the ceremony

Why doesn’t the racist bigot get the same legal carve out?

Mainly because society makes exceptions for minorities based on skin color that they have no control over

Gays choose to boink other men

Do you remember when you made the choice of women over men? Was it a difficult decision?

I never thought about or even knew there were homosexuals when I was a child

Now the schools make it a subject for children even before kindergarten

You did not answer the question...when did you choose women over men? Did you try both before choosing?

Thats a “when dod you stop beating your wife question”

As I tried to explain to you I grew up in a time when children were not confronted with a stark choice they were not prepared to make

Marriage was between a man and a woman

Boys wore pants and did boys stuff and girls wore dresses

I suppose you are building this to a grand finale where you hit me with the gay genetic birth defect argument

If so please get on with it

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Why doesn’t the racist bigot get the same legal carve out?

Mainly because society makes exceptions for minorities based on skin color that they have no control over

Gays choose to boink other men

Do you remember when you made the choice of women over men? Was it a difficult decision?

I never thought about or even knew there were homosexuals when I was a child

Now the schools make it a subject for children even before kindergarten

You did not answer the question...when did you choose women over men? Did you try both before choosing?

Thats a “when dod you stop beating your wife question”

As I tried to explain to you I grew up in a time when children were not confronted with a stark choice they were not prepared to make

Marriage was between a man and a woman

Boys wore pants and did boys stuff and girls wore dresses

I suppose you are building this to a grand finale where you hit me with the gay genetic birth defect argument

If so please get on with it

So, you did not choose to be sexually attracted to the opposite sex (assuming you are), yet you claim that gay people make the choice to be sexually attracted to whom they are...

seems a bit inconsistent to put it mildly

 

[EvilCat Breath]

To the gay mafia this isn't enough. They want more.

What Chick Fil A should do is tie these activists to Peter Buttplug. Have a backlash against him and see how that disturbance goes.

 

[Mac-7]

Mainly because society makes exceptions for minorities based on skin color that they have no control over

Gays choose to boink other men

Do you remember when you made the choice of women over men? Was it a difficult decision?

I never thought about or even knew there were homosexuals when I was a child

Now the schools make it a subject for children even before kindergarten

You did not answer the question...when did you choose women over men? Did you try both before choosing?

Thats a “when dod you stop beating your wife question”

As I tried to explain to you I grew up in a time when children were not confronted with a stark choice they were not prepared to make

Marriage was between a man and a woman

Boys wore pants and did boys stuff and girls wore dresses

I suppose you are building this to a grand finale where you hit me with the gay genetic birth defect argument

If so please get on with it

So, you did not choose to be sexually attracted to the opposite sex (assuming you are), yet you claim that gay people make the choice to be sexually attracted to whom they are...

seems a bit inconsistent to put it mildly

Yes I do claim that attraction to the opposite sex is normal and attraction to the same sex is not

 

[Mac-7]

Mainly because society makes exceptions for minorities based on skin color that they have no control over

Gays choose to boink other men

Do you remember when you made the choice of women over men? Was it a difficult decision?

I never thought about or even knew there were homosexuals when I was a child

Now the schools make it a subject for children even before kindergarten

You did not answer the question...when did you choose women over men? Did you try both before choosing?

Thats a “when dod you stop beating your wife question”

As I tried to explain to you I grew up in a time when children were not confronted with a stark choice they were not prepared to make

Marriage was between a man and a woman

Boys wore pants and did boys stuff and girls wore dresses

I suppose you are building this to a grand finale where you hit me with the gay genetic birth defect argument

If so please get on with it

So, you did not choose to be sexually attracted to the opposite sex (assuming you are), yet you claim that gay people make the choice to be sexually attracted to whom they are...

seems a bit inconsistent to put it mildly

Now let me ask you a question

Do bank robbers choose to be bank robbers or are they born that way?

 

[BrokeLoser]

Weird...you say nothing about dark folks celebrating the displacement of ****** yet you’re quick to scream “RACIST” should ****** take a stand for ******....You say nothing when ass pounders force NORMAL people to pretend ass ponding is cool...yet you scream “BIGOT” and condemn those who refuse to concede that ass pounding is cool...And you don’t find any of this strange at all?

Perhaps you spend time in a different part of the forum than I do, but I have never seen a thread celebrating the displacement of white people (which would be hard since we are all still here). But have seen probably 2 to 3 hundred threads from you filled to the brim with racism ranting about "wetbacks" and "darkies" and all sorts of other names.

Nobody is asking you to do a damn thing about gay people except not attack them nor condemn just because they are different than you.

What I find strange is this overwhelming desire of your to control the lives of all those around you and make everyone just like you. How ******* boring. All you want in the country are little BL racist clones.

Come on man...stop with that playing stupid bullshit...Your congress, your media, Hollywood....they all throw parties and revel openly and publicly every single time another ****** is displaced by a dark person. You know this.

You’re confusing expectations, standards and boundaries with “CONTROL”.....I believe the aforementioned are fundamental components to a civil, first world society. I get it, you believe a society without limits, boundaries, expectations and standards is a Liberated society...As I said, you’re always a looking out for the two percentile...you give no ***** about the desires of the 98%....******* WEIRD!

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Do you remember when you made the choice of women over men? Was it a difficult decision?

I never thought about or even knew there were homosexuals when I was a child

Now the schools make it a subject for children even before kindergarten

You did not answer the question...when did you choose women over men? Did you try both before choosing?

Thats a “when dod you stop beating your wife question”

As I tried to explain to you I grew up in a time when children were not confronted with a stark choice they were not prepared to make

Marriage was between a man and a woman

Boys wore pants and did boys stuff and girls wore dresses

I suppose you are building this to a grand finale where you hit me with the gay genetic birth defect argument

If so please get on with it

So, you did not choose to be sexually attracted to the opposite sex (assuming you are), yet you claim that gay people make the choice to be sexually attracted to whom they are...

seems a bit inconsistent to put it mildly

Yes I do claim that attraction to the opposite sex is normal and attraction to the same sex is not

Still does not make it a conscious choice as you claim

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Do you remember when you made the choice of women over men? Was it a difficult decision?

I never thought about or even knew there were homosexuals when I was a child

Now the schools make it a subject for children even before kindergarten

You did not answer the question...when did you choose women over men? Did you try both before choosing?

Thats a “when dod you stop beating your wife question”

As I tried to explain to you I grew up in a time when children were not confronted with a stark choice they were not prepared to make

Marriage was between a man and a woman

Boys wore pants and did boys stuff and girls wore dresses

I suppose you are building this to a grand finale where you hit me with the gay genetic birth defect argument

If so please get on with it

So, you did not choose to be sexually attracted to the opposite sex (assuming you are), yet you claim that gay people make the choice to be sexually attracted to whom they are...

seems a bit inconsistent to put it mildly

Now let me ask you a question

Do bank robbers choose to be bank robbers or are they born that way?

Apples and oranges.

Though I do always find it fascinating when you people compare sexual choices between consenting adults and someone committing a crime.

 

[Lysistrata]

This entire argument is so silly. I have not come across any LGBT person who has tried to interfere with heterosexuals getting married, despite these claims that LGBTs are "bulling and insulting" heterosexuals. However, some heterosexuals have been bullying and insulting LGBTs, and making a big thing about their aggression against LGBTs.

Now both heterosexuals and gay men and lesbian women have the same rights as straight men and women. No one is doing damage to anybody else. I am heterosexual and have known quite a few LGBTs, who have been loving friends. Not once have any of them said anything nasty about my heterosexual relationships.

 

[22lcidw]

Mainly because society makes exceptions for minorities based on skin color that they have no control over

Gays choose to boink other men

Do you remember when you made the choice of women over men? Was it a difficult decision?

I never thought about or even knew there were homosexuals when I was a child

Now the schools make it a subject for children even before kindergarten

You did not answer the question...when did you choose women over men? Did you try both before choosing?

Thats a “when dod you stop beating your wife question”

As I tried to explain to you I grew up in a time when children were not confronted with a stark choice they were not prepared to make

Marriage was between a man and a woman

Boys wore pants and did boys stuff and girls wore dresses

I suppose you are building this to a grand finale where you hit me with the gay genetic birth defect argument

If so please get on with it

So, you did not choose to be sexually attracted to the opposite sex (assuming you are), yet you claim that gay people make the choice to be sexually attracted to whom they are...

seems a bit inconsistent to put it mildly

This is way more then gender identification. People may have been meaner in ways back then but are meaner In other ways today. Playing cowboys and Indians is almost a crime now. Playing with toy guns is a crime now. Everywhere we go we are surveilled by both public and private concerns. We go through security checkpoints in many places and it is expanding. So the loss of unalienable rights is being masked by the gain of social justice rights. What do you think is going to eventually happen?