Chicago suburb Wilmette drops handgun ban without a fight

[Ninja]

Pwned.

Wilmette Suspends Local Handgun Ban
2:47 pm CDT June 27, 2008

WILMETTE, Ill. -- Wilmette has suspended enforcement of its 19-year-old ordinance banning handgun possession in the wake of a US Supreme Court decision that appears to invalidate such bans.

In a 5-4 decision, the court struck down Washington, D.C.'s ban on handguns, a prohibition similar to those used in several major cities, including Chicago, and a handful of suburbs including Wilmette, Evanston, Winnetka and Oak Park.

"The Law Department and the Police Department have suspended enforcement of the ordinance pending further review by the Village Board," Wilmette village attorney Time Frenzer said Thursday. "Based on the decision today, at a minimum it calls into serious question the continued viability of the ordinance."

Frenzer said questions remain about how directly the court's decision will impact local gun laws in Wilmette and other parts of the country. Washington is not a state, and each state has its own legal language governing the right to bear arms.

"That aside, the opinion will require further review and discussion by the Village Board, but it's prudent at this point to suspend enforcement of it," Frenzer said.

Wilmette's law, enacted in 1989, levied fines of up to $750 for handgun possession and allowed the village to seek a judge's order to have seized weapons destroyed.

Frenzer said he did not know exactly how many times the law has been invoked, but said its use is rare.

The last case he recalls involved a 2003 incident in which a resident, Hale DeMar, was cited after using a handgun to shoot and wound a burglar in his home. The case mobilized state gun right groups and led to the passage of a law that gave gun owners a defense to local prohibitions if the weapon was used in self-defense.

Wilmette's charges against DeMar were eventually dropped. He could not be reached for comment Thursday.

Wilmette Police Chief George Carpenter declined to comment on the high court's ruling, saying he had not yet had a chance to read the decision or review it with village staff.

Wilmette Suspends Local Handgun Ban - News Story - WMAQ | Chicago

 

[Ninja]

You'll notice the article mentioned Hale DeMar - who Obama wanted to prosecute for defending his children from an intruder:

Illinois resident Hale DeMar was prosecuted by the town of Wilmette for using a handgun in his home to defend his family in 2003. Because Wilmette had imposed a ban on the possession of handguns, several Illinois state legislators introduced SB 2165 to protect the right of self-defense for residents like DeMar.

True to form, Obama voted against the pro-gun legislation

Barack Obama -- GOA 2008 Presidential Candidates and the Second Amendment

 

[nomdeplume]

Obama is a piece of dogshit that wants people to be able to sue gun manufactures if their gun brand happens to be used to murder someone.

Typical Chicago dirty politician, typical dirty lawyer.

 

[manu1959]

Obama is a piece of dogshit that wants people to be able to sue gun manufactures if their gun brand happens to be used to murder someone.

Typical Chicago dirty politician, typical dirty lawyer.

deeper pocket......why can't we sue a car mfr when someone gets killed.....cras kill more people than guns every year....

 

[Yurt]

deeper pocket......why can't we sue a car mfr when someone gets killed.....cras kill more people than guns every year....

good point...probably a question of too much "morality" in the law, instead of the law being the law. i'm guessing the thinking is the product is unreasonable dangerous, solely based on the product's purpose, such as dynomite. however, that is not how the law reads, guns are not like dynomite and do have safe and practical purposes that can be utilized in public areas -- policemen, etc...

i put morality in quotes because i think the argument is more emotional than it is logical, hence suspect.