there4eyeM
unlicensed metaphysician
- Jul 5, 2012
- 20,886
- 5,448
- 280
There is no manner in which one can achieve the wealth of those currently listed as the most without their all being implicitly complicit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The left are constantly railing against mulit-millionaire and billionaire CEO's, constantly claiming that they got rich off the backs of working people but doesn't that also apply to millionaire and billionaire Hollywood, sports, music, and other celebrities? Don't they get rich off the backs of working people as well? I won't mention any particular names due to recent events but there are several multi-millionaire or billionaire Hollywood, sports, music, and other celebrities who wouldn't be rich but for taking huge sums of money off the backs of working people. Why do they get a pass but company CEO's don't?
Since you are giving me no information here other than your claim has been denied, I can't evaluate or comment. Sorry.Some of them.
I should never need a lawyer in a simple case like this.
Since you are giving me no information here other than your claim has been denied, I can't evaluate or comment. Sorry.
Show me where I said what you claimed I said… we are waitingA reply in kind so........................
I didn't suggest you needed to prove it to me or anybody else. I was just saying I don't know what the circumstances are when you provide no information. So we should just both move on. Do have a pleasant rest of your day.There are millions and millions of stories out there by people with denied claims. I do not have to prove it to you.
There is a reason so many understood the actions of Luigi.
Show me where I said what you claimed I said… we are waiting
Explain.They all did.
Perhaps nobody is forced to buy from the drug companies. They are free to just die instead.No one forces you to buy their products and or services. What are you babbling about?
That’s retarded. Life saving drugs are a good thing. You truly are a very stupid person.Perhaps nobody is forced to buy from the drug companies. They are free to just die instead.
Lifesaving drugs are great. Not being able to afford those overpriced lifesaving drugs because the drug companies are gouging the sick sucks.That’s retarded. Life saving drugs are a good thing. You truly are a very stupid person.
Who can’t afford them? What are you talking about? Drug companies work for a profit hence they discover these life saving drugs, leftist.Lifesaving drugs are great. Not being able to afford those overpriced lifesaving drugs because the drug companies are gouging the sick sucks.
I, for one, can't afford them. Even with insurance, several hundred per month isn't always easy to come up with.Who can’t afford them? What are you talking about? Drug companies work for a profit hence they discover these life saving drugs, leftist.
How unhealthy are you? No wonder you’re angry. So you want me to pay for your poor decisions as a younger person? Got it!I, for one, can't afford them. Even with insurance, several hundred per month isn't always easy to come up with.
That’s not very Christian of you.It's all there for people to read.
We have Medicaid for people like youI, for one, can't afford them. Even with insurance, several hundred per month isn't always easy to come up with.
You’ve got that backwards. CEOs need to please every one of their customers, employees and stockholders every day. Entertainers, sports, movies or musicians only have to please their fans once in a while. Plus none of them live in the real world. I’ve both sang and acted and ninety percent of actors and musicians are flakes, most athletes are basket cases outside their specialized sports. CEOs, or any manager for that matter need to make good decisions under pressure, work hundred hour weeks and sacrifice their personnel lives for their jobs.I'm sure there are lots of similarities, but the main difference is athletes and Hollywood types made and maintain their riches by supplying entertainment that each of their fans can individually choose whether they will pay for. If the public doesn't like them, their money goes away. CEOs make theirs by manipulating the market and taking advantage of loopholes and grants that aren't available to the average person. They don't have to satisfy the public. They just have to satisfy the small number of people that regulate their business. Fewer regulations mean a smaller amount of people for them to satisfy.
Now there is why I will never be a right winger. No, I don't expect anybody to pay my medical bills. That is why I have insurance. I don't have a problem with drug companies making a profit. I just see it as unfair for drug companies to make massively excessive profits at the expense of those who have no choice but to pay it. It's kinda like multiplying the price of bottled water after a natural disaster. Unfair and unethical.How unhealthy are you? No wonder you’re angry. So you want me to pay for your poor decisions as a younger person? Got it!
Thanks for that
Only if you have less than $967 per month income including retirement and social security. Instead of trying to find ways for the government to pay massively high medical bills, we should limit the uncalled for, outrageous profit that drug companies exact on those who have no choice but to purchase their product.We have Medicaid for people like you