Cheapest source of Fossil Fuel generation is Double the cost of Utility-scale solar

No but I believe in them for i dividual households if they want. And give them a tax break for them too.
ok, but why don't you have one then. I keep hearing how solar and wind provide the lowest cost energy. What is keeping you from buying one?
 
Why should I be for it?
It seems to me that anyone who says they believe in AGW should have already installed one regardless of subsidies or cost. Especially since they claim they are so great. So if they haven't installed solar panels and bought an EV, it makes me wonder if they really do believe in AGW.
 
OK, if that is the case, why should we build anymore fossil fuel generation? In the meantime, 90% of new generation in the US was renewables in 2024;
Fossil fuel generation is generally built closer to the existing transmission system, is more reliable (in terms of guaranteed generation ratings), and is just easier for the utilities to deal with than most renewables.

We’re building renewables because the government and the woke citizenry has put every possible roadblock in the way of building any new fossil fuel or nuclear generation.

Unfortunately this could eventually lead to a reduction in the available power resources. How? You ask… because most renewables are rated in a range rather than at a specific rating because they are so affected by weather and other factors; compared to a fossil fuel generator which puts out a constant Mw value.
 
It helps lessen the load on the grid. Its an incentive. If we're going to give billionaires tax breaks then give non billionaires tax breaks.

It helps lessen the load on the grid.

How does it lessen the load on the grid?

Its an incentive.

Right, an incentive to waste money.
 
It helps lessen the load on the grid.

How does it lessen the load on the grid?

Its an incentive.

Right, an incentive to waste money.
Solar panels on a roof are a waste of money? Perfectly unreasonable response. Let each homeowner decide.
 
Solar panels on a roof are a waste of money? Perfectly unreasonable response. Let each homeowner decide.

In many parts of the country, it is a massive waste of money.
I agree, if a homeowner wants to waste his own money, he can.
With no taxpayer assistance.
 
In many parts of the country, it is a massive waste of money.
I agree, if a homeowner wants to waste his own money, he can.
With no taxpayer assistance.
Giving one a tax incentive isn't having taxpayers assist. I find this better than giving Uber wealthy folk a big tax cut.
 
Ok so then outlaw solar correct? Start writing a check to the plutocrats.
 
Please explain how individual solar panels on a house is a waste. So are you a coal fan? I can live with that but the guts goung underground are due a big time pay increase. And no that will not increase coal prices.
 
Please explain how individual solar panels on a house is a waste. So are you a coal fan? I can live with that but the guts goung underground are due a big time pay increase. And no that will not increase coal prices.

Here in Chicago, the limited hours of useful sunlight make solar panels a giant waste of money. Yes, electricity from coal is very useful and reliable.
 
Here in Chicago, the limited hours of useful sunlight make solar panels a giant waste of money. Yes, electricity from coal is very useful and reliable.
Just increase cosl miners wages bigly. It wont affect coal prices. Or just don't have miners go underground. Both are workable. Its nice that the funding for black lung disease was cut. Thats a really nice move.
 
Just increase cosl miners wages bigly. It wont affect coal prices. Or just don't have miners go underground. Both are workable. Its nice that the funding for black lung disease was cut. Thats a really nice move.

It wont affect coal prices.

Why not?
 
Back
Top Bottom