Charlie Kirk Memorial Garden

[The Irish Ram]

Many of us are struggling to adapt to the barbarism of trump. Maybe a kirk garden would help ?

You are too insignificant to be effected by America. You are an idiot. Suffer on...

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Untrue. You get what you give.

I caught a bit of the Kirk party yesterday.
Pigs belching vomit to other pigs. It worked for trump. It worked for kirk until it didnt.
America faces a long walk back to decency.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Should President Trump divert any notional DOGE savings into a Charlie Kirk Memorial Garden ?

A spiritual place where conservatives can meet and reflect on the great mans essential teachings before going bowling or watching a monster truck display.
Trump has already floated the idea of a Heroes Garden highlighting real American heroes like Stonewall Jackson and Bedford Forest Klanboi.
Surely the way forward for this is to go all in and name the whole thing after Charlie ?
Build it in a midwest state where there isnt much to see. Have a Trump Tower hotel for folk to stay over. Families could take their kids to learn about hate and prejudice.
I think it would rival Disney. Especially among maga and crazy evangelicals which is basically the same thing.
At sunset there could be a parade of oath keepers and ICE agents before they beat up some mexicans and rape an underage girl.

Trump’s ‘Hero garden’ - with Abe Lincoln and Julia Child - is coming

That's some serious hate speech
Be a shame if the real nazis came knocking on your door

Im extremely offended and my sand ****** vagina feelings are hurt

You're only hope now is to repent and embrace your Lord and Savior Jesus Christ
Although that'll probably also get you arrested

 

[Eman623]

I caught a bit of the Kirk party yesterday.
Pigs belching vomit to other pigs. It worked for trump. It worked for kirk until it didnt.
America faces a long walk back to decency.

I don't think it's physically possible to belch vomit.

Maybe pig physiology is different.

Enjoy the hate you seem to enjoy giving and getting. I hear it releases endorphins and can become addicting.

 

[Papageorgio]

Should President Trump divert any notional DOGE savings into a Charlie Kirk Memorial Garden ?

A spiritual place where conservatives can meet and reflect on the great mans essential teachings before going bowling or watching a monster truck display.
Trump has already floated the idea of a Heroes Garden highlighting real American heroes like Stonewall Jackson and Bedford Forest Klanboi.
Surely the way forward for this is to go all in and name the whole thing after Charlie ?
Build it in a midwest state where there isnt much to see. Have a Trump Tower hotel for folk to stay over. Families could take their kids to learn about hate and prejudice.
I think it would rival Disney. Especially among maga and crazy evangelicals which is basically the same thing.
At sunset there could be a parade of oath keepers and ICE agents before they beat up some mexicans and rape an underage girl.

Trump’s ‘Hero garden’ - with Abe Lincoln and Julia Child - is coming

I don’t believe government money needs to be used, however I also don’t think it will be needed. If it is built, it will be in Tempe, AZ. I think Kirk would rather the government money be used to lessen the debt, that’s what I saw watching him.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

That's some serious hate speech
Be a shame if the real nazis came knocking on your door

Im extremely offended and my sand ****** vagina feelings are hurt

You're only hope now is to repent and embrace your Lord and Savior Jesus Christ
Although that'll probably also get you arrested

Even now Kirk is stuck at the gates and asking to see a manager. He will not get into heaven with his record.

 

[Papageorgio]

Even now Kirk is stuck at the gates and asking to see a manager. He will not get into heaven with his record.

You don’t even know his record and if you really believed in God, you wouldn’t judge others, only God sees the heart.

Based on the videos I have seen of Kirk, he was respect, skin color didn’t matter, neither did sexual or, he was willing to have a conversation, have an open dialogue, find common ground and could agree to disagree. If we had more conversations we’d have less violence, that was also a Kirk belief.

 

[Stryder50]

Even now Kirk is stuck at the gates and asking to see a manager. He will not get into heaven with his record.

Projection there 'tommy'.
You're the one who won't get into Heaven.

 

[San Souci]

Should President Trump divert any notional DOGE savings into a Charlie Kirk Memorial Garden ?

A spiritual place where conservatives can meet and reflect on the great mans essential teachings before going bowling or watching a monster truck display.
Trump has already floated the idea of a Heroes Garden highlighting real American heroes like Stonewall Jackson and Bedford Forest Klanboi.
Surely the way forward for this is to go all in and name the whole thing after Charlie ?
Build it in a midwest state where there isnt much to see. Have a Trump Tower hotel for folk to stay over. Families could take their kids to learn about hate and prejudice.
I think it would rival Disney. Especially among maga and crazy evangelicals which is basically the same thing.
At sunset there could be a parade of oath keepers and ICE agents before they beat up some mexicans and rape an underage girl.

Trump’s ‘Hero garden’ - with Abe Lincoln and Julia Child - is coming

Better than supporting Faggots and Bush Babies

 

[hondo 50]

I caught a bit of the Kirk party yesterday.
Pigs belching vomit to other pigs. It worked for trump. It worked for kirk until it didnt.
America faces a long walk back to decency.

Funny how people can't stay away from stuff they loathe.

 

[frigidweirdo]

You seem to be a very bitter and petty little creature. You should probably talk to someone about that, it's not healthy.

And what does your post say about you? You couldn't even be bothered to talk about the topic. Who cares what he is? If you don't like the most, either counter his argument, or don't reply.

Kirk liked to manipulate people into hatred. Maybe if Kirk had spoken to someone about it, things would be different for him right now.

 

[hadit]

And what does your post say about you? You couldn't even be bothered to talk about the topic. Who cares what he is? If you don't like the most, either counter his argument, or don't reply.

Kirk liked to manipulate people into hatred. Maybe if Kirk had spoken to someone about it, things would be different for him right now.

So now we're excusing murder because of words?

 

[midcan5]

Interesting that the cowardly draft dodger and convicted felon Trump would want a memorial garden.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Interesting that the cowardly draft dodger and convicted felon Trump would want a memorial garden.

If he places it on his golf course he can get a tax rebate. Everyone wins.

 

[frigidweirdo]

So now we're excusing murder because of words?

Which part of what has been said do you think is "excusing murder"?

Oh wait, nothing, but you're just playing games.

 

[hadit]

Which part of what has been said do you think is "excusing murder"?

Oh wait, nothing, but you're just playing games.

When you say that if someone was just nicer, he might not have been killed, you're excusing murder because of words. Charlie spoke truth, obviously some did not like that.

 

[frigidweirdo]

When you say that if someone was just nicer, he might not have been killed, you're excusing murder because of words. Charlie spoke truth, obviously some did not like that.

No, I don't think you are.

Did he speak the truth? No, I don't think he did. He didn't look for the truth, he looked for manipulation.



17 minutes in, he's talking to a guy in a black/dark gray t-shirt.

"Why do you think the US is so divided?" the kid asks.

"Has there been an instance, guys, where a liberal has had an open mike on campus where conservative kids can ask questions and you guys feel respected?"

He didn't answer the question.

"How many of you kids here on campus, raise your hand, feel as if you're graded down if you come out as a liberal or a Trump supporter?"

And most of the crowd seems to put their hand up.

"It is not because of conservatives".....

Is it "the truth" that it's Liberals fault and ONLY Liberals fault that the US is divided? No, not at all.

It's just lazy politics. Ignoring most of what exists and picking one thing.

 

[hadit]

No, I don't think you are.

Did he speak the truth? No, I don't think he did. He didn't look for the truth, he looked for manipulation.



17 minutes in, he's talking to a guy in a black/dark gray t-shirt.

"Why do you think the US is so divided?" the kid asks.

"Has there been an instance, guys, where a liberal has had an open mike on campus where conservative kids can ask questions and you guys feel respected?"

He didn't answer the question.

Exactly, he got the kid to look at his own experience for the answer to his question. Masterful, because instead of just force feeding them the way their professors did, he let them come to their own conclusions. Think, if liberals DO have an open mike on campus and respectfully debated conservative students, they would have leaped forward to say they yes, do, and here's where they do it. Obviously, they don't.

"How many of you kids here on campus, raise your hand, feel as if you're graded down if you come out as a liberal or a Trump supporter?"

And most of the crowd seems to put their hand up.

That's not slanting the question one way or the other. Note that he specified "a liberal or a Trump supporter". IOW, he's putting it back on them, have you experienced this kind of discrimination? And most have.

"It is not because of conservatives".....

And here he lays out the inevitable conclusion, that the only division in the country that the students can personally speak to is not because of conservatives, because there is no conservative tipping of the scales on college campuses, only liberal.

Is it "the truth" that it's Liberals fault and ONLY Liberals fault that the US is divided? No, not at all.

It's just lazy politics. Ignoring most of what exists and picking one thing.

Let's see what we're dealing with here. In your example, he was asked why HE THOUGHT the US was divided. That right there means he was going to give his OPINION and nullifies your argument right out of the gate that he's not speaking truth. Then, instead of just giving his opinion, he led the audience to the point where THEY came to the conclusion that echoed his own opinion. IOW, he simply asked them to look into their own experience to see for themselves how conditions in their own schools helped drive the divisions in the country.

That is the height of truth telling because it required the students to look at their own experiences instead of him just giving his opinion as fact. In both cases, the conclusion is inescapable. No, liberals do not go on campus with an open mike and respectfully debate conservative students and most students can honestly say they have faced discrimination because of their political beliefs, either liberal or conservative. What do we see liberals do when challenged on their beliefs? Riots, assaults, verbal abuse, attempts to shut down speech, etc. Where do they simply open the mike and battle in the arena of ideas?

Sorry, but you're going to have to find something else to make your point.

 

[JohnDB]

 

[frigidweirdo]

Exactly, he got the kid to look at his own experience for the answer to his question. Masterful, because instead of just force feeding them the way their professors did, he let them come to their own conclusions. Think, if liberals DO have an open mike on campus and respectfully debated conservative students, they would have leaped forward to say they yes, do, and here's where they do it. Obviously, they don't.

That's not slanting the question one way or the other. Note that he specified "a liberal or a Trump supporter". IOW, he's putting it back on them, have you experienced this kind of discrimination? And most have.

And here he lays out the inevitable conclusion, that the only division in the country that the students can personally speak to is not because of conservatives, because there is no conservative tipping of the scales on college campuses, only liberal.

Let's see what we're dealing with here. In your example, he was asked why HE THOUGHT the US was divided. That right there means he was going to give his OPINION and nullifies your argument right out of the gate that he's not speaking truth. Then, instead of just giving his opinion, he led the audience to the point where THEY came to the conclusion that echoed his own opinion. IOW, he simply asked them to look into their own experience to see for themselves how conditions in their own schools helped drive the divisions in the country.

That is the height of truth telling because it required the students to look at their own experiences instead of him just giving his opinion as fact. In both cases, the conclusion is inescapable. No, liberals do not go on campus with an open mike and respectfully debate conservative students and most students can honestly say they have faced discrimination because of their political beliefs, either liberal or conservative. What do we see liberals do when challenged on their beliefs? Riots, assaults, verbal abuse, attempts to shut down speech, etc. Where do they simply open the mike and battle in the arena of ideas?

Sorry, but you're going to have to find something else to make your point.

No, he didn't.

Who does open mike? Like, literally one person. It's not like "the right", the whole of them, does open mike.

So, he's using something and manipulating the facts to make it look like something is happening, when it's not.

And the "conclusion" he's pushing the kid into, is the one he wanted to push the kid into.

Masterful, yes, but it's the art of manipulation, not of debate.

The thing with asking about whether they've had discrimination is clearly attacking liberal professors. The whole "look, I'm trying to be neutral, but really I'm not is a tactic.

So, the "logical conclusion" here is that we take one thing, professors discriminating against college students, either liberal or MAGA, and this then translates to ALL DIVISION IS LIBERAL DIVISION?

You just said in the previous paragraph that professors could be attacking people for both being liberal or MAGA. Then you act like it's just MAGA. Which is it?

And then you go from one small thing, of the way professors treat people who somehow come out as political, somehow equates to ALL DIVISION IN THE COUNTRY.

Let's forget about racism, let's forget about conservative v. liberal, let's forget about the electoral system, let's forget about the rich people who spend money to manipulate. No, none of this has anything to do with division in the US, the only thing is college professors marking you down because you told them you were MAGA.

Or, the other conclusion that if college professors are marking you down because you're MAGA, every problem out there is some liberal doing something that is wrong. This one example shows that in EVERY EXAMPLE, it's a liberal doing something wrong.

I'm sorry, but that's BULLSHIT.