You have to prove that the same racism exists.
You’re the racist because you demand all blacks think one way. They are individuals who have a right to think. You’re an ideological plantation owner here. Shame on you. We should strive to move beyond your regressive, racist thinking
Are you aware of the MLK rape recording in the national archives? It will be released to the public in 2027. MLK isnt just a flawed man. If the recording says what they say it says, MLK was an evil monster.Martin Luther King was a flawed human being as all human beings are. A redeemed sinner who sought to do good, not evil. We do not have to agree with every position he took on everything in order to appreciate that he had it right that non violent persuasion was the best way to end racism, and not race riots or SJW militancy and shouting and self-serving opportunism that keeps racism alive and well in America.
I use the analogy that racism ends when we see skin color as of no more importance than eye or hair color. MLK used the analogy that racism ends when we judge people by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin.
A summary of the MLK doctrine of non violence:
King’s notion of nonviolence had six key principles:
--First, one can resist evil without resorting to violence.
--Second, nonviolence seeks to win the “friendship and understanding” of the opponent, not to humiliate him (King, Stride, 84).
--Third, evil itself, not the people committing evil acts, should be opposed.
--Fourth, those committed to nonviolence must be willing to suffer without retaliation as suffering itself can be redemptive
-- Fifth, nonviolent resistance avoids “external physical violence” and “internal violence of spirit” as well: “The nonviolent resister not only refuses to shoot his opponent but he also refuses to hate him” (King, Stride, 85). The resister should be motivated by love in the sense of the Greek word agape, which means “understanding,” or “redeeming good will for all men” (King, Stride, 86).
--The sixth principle is that the nonviolent resister must have a “deep faith in the future,” stemming from the conviction that “The universe is on the side of justice” (King, Stride, 88).
Nonviolence
kinginstitute.stanford.edu
MLK preached a strong doctrine of replacing hate with Christian love:
MLK's Solution to Racism
Here's MLK's solution to racism and what compelled himwww.everystudent.com
And in the midst of it, MLK worked tirelessly to end the injustices of Jim Crow laws. Jailed on trumped up charges, it would be JFK who ordered his release. And it was almost certainly MLK's popularity and influence that prompted LBJ's 1964 Civil Rights Act that ended institutional racism once and for all whatever unintended negative consequences came from that.
Martin Luther King, Jr. - Civil Rights, SCLC, Nonviolence | Britannica
Martin Luther King, Jr. - Civil Rights, SCLC, Nonviolence: Recognizing the need for a mass movement to capitalize on the successful Montgomery action, King set about organizing the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), which gave him a base of operation throughout the South, as well...www.britannica.com
I have no problem with MLK being honored for his place in the history of America even though racists of all colors ignore his philosophy and still work to promote racist ideas and policy for their own self interests.
theconversation.com
You cant tell if a man is good or evil just from speeches made to the public. What else do we have to go on other than those speeches?
When did i demand that? You think black folks should think like Uncle Ben, Uncle Thomas, Tim Scott or any of these other boot licking coons.
Save that bullshit, as long as, we stay in a inferior position you are happy.
That is what MAGA is all about, you want to go back to the good old days, the 50s, 40s, etc.
I don't know about that and will leave that to those who like to tear down people of history and make them into villains. All I know is MLK helped change hearts and minds of millions of Americans, both black and white in a good way, and helped change bad attitudes into better ones. I won't take that away from him.Are you aware of the MLK rape recording in the national archives? It will be released to the public in 2027. MLK isnt just a flawed man. If the recording says what they say it says, MLK was an evil monster.
I’m an MLK scholar – and I’ll never be able to view King in the same light
King was once thought of as a saint beyond reproach. It eventually emerged that he was a womanizer. But we now have to ask the unthinkable: Did King enable abuse?
Um, if there is such a tape, wouldnt it be appropriate to tear down the villain?
No you can't. And yes I've read a lot of the negatives said about MLK. But if his wife knew his sins and could forgive him and choose to carry on the good of his legacy, who am I to judge him? The man may have been a bad man at times, feet of clay and all that. But I am reminded that we all sin and fall short. And God used a lot of imperfect people to do great things in the Bible. Who is to say that doesn't still happen?
What makes you think his wife knows all of his sins? You think MLK would go home after watching and encouraging a rape and share that story with his wife? If nutbag serial killers can hide their darkness from their wives, MLK certainly could too.
Criticize, prosecute those who do wrong yes. I don't know if such a tape exists. It could just be another rumor started by race baiters to destroy MLK's message. I don't know.
What makes you think you know all his sins? Who is given to know all of anybody's sins? We know that King confessed to his wife and was highly criticized for it as she was recovering from serious surgery at the time. But again if she forgave him, who are you, who am I to do any less?
We probably shouldnt have schools and streets named after him if the tape turns out to be real, right? We should tear down ALL of his statues if the tape is real, right?
MLK would have followed the money. Those others are intellectuals and academics.
I do not believe in tearing down historical markers. The purpose of history is to teach, inform, remind, learn from and that means ALL of history, the good and the bad.
Well you know what. I don't find discussion interesting when somebody just keeps making insulting statements about somebody and has nothing much else to offer? Thanks for understanding.
My points aren’t insults. They’re analysis.
To me I think analysis requires a reasoned and logical explanation for why an observation is held. Otherwise it is just an insult that may or may not have a reasonable foundation to justify it,
