Wrong-o. I haven't been lied to: I calculated this myself. Studies consistently show that the number of vaccinated people are catching Covid at a higher rate than the background rate of population vaccination. Watch and see: you may see the same as I have.
Wrong-o. I haven't been lied to: I calculated this myself. Studies consistently show that the number of vaccinated people are catching Covid at a higher rate than the background rate of population vaccination. Watch and see: you may see the same as I have.
In one case it is indeed an artifact of the study conditions: the original (summer) Delta research showed 100% of vaccinated people caught it: but that was because the subjects were all international air travelers who had to be vaccinated and document it before they could fly. So it wasn't good that they were catching it anyway, obviously, but it's irrelevant that it was 100% --- that was an artifact of the pool of subjects.
But the study from Nantucket that showed the people who caught Covid at that music festival was well higher than the background population vaccination rate ------- that alerted me to the problem. I posted it here.
Since then I've seen it again and again. I'm hoping it IS somehow an artifact, but if they are taking subjects right from emergency rooms, that's not as likely. I assume you see the implications if the percentage of vaccinated people catching Covid is LARGER than the percentage of the population vaccinated?
Sometimes we can't win for losing --------
No amount of taunting is going to make me want to indulge you.
Oh, arrrrrrrgghhhhh ---- how many times do I have to post all this and the links? They are pretty common: next time I see such a study I'll link it.
That's another troll you don't want to feed. It will never matter how much actual evidence you have.
I did ----- because as I said before, it's something I've been interested in. The bottom line is that his figure, 78.9? is for people with at least one vaccination shot, and they did apparently catch Covid anyway and the CDC says so, but I don't really know what that means. One shot is not "full vaccination" in terms of these lousy new-type shots they give: I don't like to call them vaccines, since they don't seem to be much good. Still, the incidence of disease is WAYYYY higher than the population vaccination rate. I don't like it. GG: you are a smart guy, I can tell. Keep an eye out. I could use a little help here. Something is going on here about these weird numbers, that seem to show people get Covid MORE if they've been vaccinated.
Don’t agree about the delta but with the omnicron its obvious that vaccines certainly don’t prevent and may actually enhance transmission.
Indulge me?
What does that prove exactly? Who are you owning by pointing to this?
The only person here whose "vaccine" status you are allowed to care about is YOU.
Data is science.
That why teachers are striking, the jab keeps them safe?
Then why is Brandon getting thousands of healthcare workers fired during this ‘crisis’ then?
Brandon tell you?
