- Thread starter
- #101
Trump told you that? I don't believe he said that.His plan was to terrorize congress into not certifying the vote (usually a routine procedure), then foist false slates of electors from the disputed states.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump told you that? I don't believe he said that.His plan was to terrorize congress into not certifying the vote (usually a routine procedure), then foist false slates of electors from the disputed states.
And here you are talking like you despise whites.She repaid money he spent on her during dates. That's not so uncommon among professional or independent women who refuse to depend on men for money. I've had that happen to me with white women I dated when I was younger. They just went to the ATM to get the money and that's the difference.
Her dad did not realize she was being promiscuous.It's a black thing, as her Dad said. You can doubt all you want, John, but the court won't care.
...being promiscuous, or having a lover, is not a crime. Go away.Her dad did not realize she was being promiscuous.
It's a conflict of interest to screw your employee. What the hell is wrong with you?...being promiscuous, or having a lover, is not a crime. Go away.
The whole case is bullshit legal theory.Says the one who won't admit he's pretending to get hysterical to help Trump escape prosecution.
What they call evidence.Their credibility is fine. The evidence got trump indicted.
It's a conflict of interest to screw your employee. What the hell is wrong with you?...being promiscuous, or having a lover, is not a crime. Go away.
Pretty sure he has no employees or that no one is that desperate for a job.It's a conflict of interest to screw your employee. What the hell is wrong with you?
Where was his military forces that day at the Capitol?His plan was to terrorize congress into not certifying the vote (usually a routine procedure), then foist false slates of electors from the disputed states.
... but has nothing to do with interfering with the case, which is the lodestone for removal. What is wrong with you? Trump is going to trial, and Fani is going to pin his ass to the wall.It's a conflict of interest to screw your employee. What the hell is wrong with you?
Do you understand conflict of interest? Nevermind, you do not.... but has nothing to do with interfering with the case, which is the lodestone for removal. What is wrong with you? Trump is going to trial, and Fani is going to pin his ass to the wall.
There is no conflict of interest. Their relationship did not impinge on the case or affect any protections for the accused.Do you understand conflict of interest? Nevermind, you do not.
Ask yourself then, why was she in court, along with her past lover?
Of course you're sure of it..... You just don't want to deal with it.Sounds reasonable to me.
Not sure who she was dating has to do with Trump's attempt to overthrow an election he lost.
Their relationship impinged on the case in every way up to an including selection, favoritism and financial gain.There is no conflict of interest. Their relationship did not impinge on the case or affect any protections for the accused.
She was in court because MAGAevil was once again trying to pervert the law to save the Orange Criminal.
It's hard to make that case when Nathan Wade's income actually went down since he took a pay cut to work the case and testified to working more hours for the case than he's legally allowed to bill the county for. If anything the county is getting work from him for free.Their relationship impinged on the case in every way up to an including selection, favoritism and financial gain.