imawhosure
Platinum Member
- Apr 25, 2015
- 9,404
- 3,029
- 360
Well, things always change, but remember Obama vs Hillary? Well, now look at this Poll Sanders surges ahead of Clinton in New Hampshire TheHill
I can plainly see that Oreo is an establishment republican, and neither he nor those with over 20,000 posts can understand why Hillary and Bush are in deep trouble. Americans are extremely pissed; at record numbers in fact, and these people believe that they can "guide" the narrative in the usual manner making everything fine and dandy.
Just for a reality check.........specifically to candy............Bush is useless. His base despises him almost as much as they despise Obama, because he is another politician who whines and moans about your party, but will go along with the program as long as HIS guys are in charge.
That being said, he has a higher probability of getting the GOP nod than Hillary. Why? Because there are so many GOP candidates, it has a high probability of going to go to convention. Unless the conservatives are highly intelligent, the establishment will try and cut a deal to get him or Kascich the nomination.
Not so on the democratic side. There is only 2, or possibly 3 possible winners there, and the democrats do not trust Clinton. It will be much easier for the democrats to coalesce around 1 adversary, and knock Clinton out of the box.
Just as the GOP has Trump leading, it is because very few people besides the Washington elites want Bush. It is also why Bernie is drawing tremendous crowds; because the democrats do not really want Clinton. The mainstream posters and pundits do not really understand it, because they do NOT believe that the country will convert its anger into throwing the establishment out.
If I was you people, I would start to reconsider-)
No one is going to elect a 3rd Bush. The difference in your analogy is that Hillary Clinton will be the nominee of the Democrat Party because she was kicked to the curb by party faithfuls with Obama--and she is a WOMAN. They want the title to the first woman POTUS and Bernie Sanders is not going to keep them away from that title.
If you remember correctly it was Hillary Clinton that had a huge lead at this time during the 2008 election cycle and it was Obama that caught up to her and then surpassed her in the later stages. So Bernie Sanders getting a little pop this early means nothing.
Donald Trump has lost support since the debate. CNBC has him down 10 points, another 17 points. He's not going to get within 200 miles of the White House. They're already making fun of him.
Also, what person that you know that claims to be a conservative, donates to Hillary Clinton's senate campaign fund, and just prior to Trump announcing he gets a call from Bill Clinton. Now who's playing who?
Here is Carly Fiorina calling Trump out on this:
I am not a Trump supporter at all. I would vote far faster for Fiarina than Trump. I am not here to trash Carly at all, just disagree with you on Hilly having her nomination locked. It is obvious to me you will not believe it when I tell you that Hilly is in more than minor trouble. The democratic hierarchy knows this, but what would you expect them to say? "Our candidate is looking sickly, but we are going to nominate her anyway?" Of course not! Even the democratic zillion post posters on here are showing false bravado; and I am positive most of these shills know their heroes position is tenuous.
No, what is happening is they are confidently going by the numbers that they post everywhere. What I keep telling everyone about those numbers is.............people have left the republican party to become independent because of the republicans NOT representing them. So when the democrat tells you that MOST independents are moderate so will vote with them, just smile and say, "yeah sure." Even Romney carried a much larger % of the independents than Obama in 2012, just because of this reason. A conservative will carry more of them than Romney did because they are former Reagan republicans, and much larger base will appear to boot.
Just a question to you. I have been told that if Trump were to win the Whitehouse, he would be the 1st President to supply us with a 1st Lady who was in porn. Is this true? If it is, he certainly won't win the republican nomination, and will get more democratic votes than republican votes if he runs 3rd party, lol.
I have been told by 5 or 6 people this is fact, but a lot of her pictures have been expunged from the internet, but a lot are still around. Since I just came home from work, I have not had the time to look.