- May 23, 2012
- 10,511
- 2,333
- 280
A lot of trump's criminal excesses might have been avoided had republicans listened to witnesses during the trump impeachments.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
In what way are they not being treated like every other criminal?
Just saying something doesn't make it true.
Back up your words.
They let her out. And she violated the terms of the Parole.
Can you provide a couple of case numbers or names if you know them? I'd love to look up their cases.Held without bail, or charges, for up to 3 months, for starters.
He cannot, because he is shamelessly lying his little ass off.Can you provide a couple of case numbers or names if you know them? I'd love to look up their cases.
Can you provide a couple of case numbers or names if you know them? I'd love to look up their cases.
Wouldn't most of those cases be the legitimate ones? I've trying to hone in on the people who are being held without being charged or bail.Just Google "Capitol breach case numbers"
They pop right up.
Knock yourself out.
I didJust Google "Capitol breach case numbers"
They pop right up.
Knock yourself out.
After MONTHS. Your idiot DA's let accused murderers out in hours.
It might help if she had a lawyer. But she is crazy and won’t accept one.
Haha, so damn stupid. Remind us which of them are getting life sentences. You know, since you have now discarded your lie about them being held without charges.Yes, she is a loon. No question. But the way these idiots are being treated, compared to actual murderers, is absurd.
Yes, she is a loon. No question. But the way these idiots are being treated, compared to actual murderers, is absurd.
Judges have that discretion, and when they think a defendant is harming herself, they can use it. They can also refuse to allow defendants to dismiss their lawyers they have already chosen.and also denied her attempt to have a nonadmitted lawyer represent her.
I don't understand this part. The result would likely have been the same but why can't she chose who represents her?
and also denied her attempt to have a nonadmitted lawyer represent her.
I don't understand this part. The result would likely have been the same but why can't she chose who represents her?
In what way are they being treated like every other criminal?
Held without bail, or charges, for up to 3 months, for starters.
Just Google "Capitol breach case numbers"
They pop right up.
Knock yourself out.
It might help if she had a lawyer. But she is crazy and won’t accept one.
Kind of like black people who think they don’t need to obey police, right?This woman is very stupid.
She is granted bail but refuses to follow the conditions of being released.
That's on top of being totally bat crap crazy. She has refused representation and wanted a non admitted lawyer to represent her.
She rambles on and interrupts the judge saying the court doesn't have any jurisdiction over her as she is a "sovereign citizen" and a " self governed individual."
The woman is nuts but she's going to jail.
She only has herself to blame.
I will never understand why republicans don't believe that they should never have to take the bad consequences to their very bad choices.
You republicans are no different from everyone else. If you make a bad choice, you will have to deal with those very bad consequences.