Capitalism or Communism? Is communism really that horrible?

[JakeStarkey]

Uncensored wants to be a libertarian master to terrorize without impediment those who work for him.

Such a fool. He was born 150 years too late.

 

[tooAlive]

Pay attention, please.

Of course it's possible We are talking about the perceived horrors of a national life: fascism, unregulated economy, communism, libertarianism.

You mean to tell us that the "perceived horrors" were different that the "real horrors" of life under communism?

You mean then that fascist, communist, and libertarian nations would be horrific for the citizens.

Libertarian ideals are incompatible with those of fascism and communism.

 

[JakeStarkey]

We have already shown the woefully inadequate nature of the graphic. Go back and look it up if you can't remember. Libertarians are the flip side of the coin that is communism on the other side.

 

[tooAlive]

We have already shown the woefully inadequate nature of the graphic. Go back and look it up if you can't remember. Libertarians are the flip side of the coin that is communism on the other side.

Libertarians believe in a republic that protects the people by defending their inherent rights outlined in a constitution.

Communism involves controlling the people.

There's a fine line between defending and controlling the populace. Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Castro, Tse-Tung, and every other dictator in history have controlled their populace.

Again, libertarians advocate defending the inherent rights of the populace. That's what a republic is about, not a democracy. I believe you have some brushing up to do on ideologies.

 

[JakeStarkey]

We have already shown the woefully inadequate nature of the graphic. Go back and look it up if you can't remember. Libertarians are the flip side of the coin that is communism on the other side.

Libertarians believe in a republic that protects the people by defending their inherent rights outlined in a constitution.

Communism involves controlling the people.

There's a fine line between defending and controlling the populace. Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Castro, Tse-Tung, and every other dictator in history have controlled their populace.

Again, libertarians advocate defending the inherent rights of the populace. That's what a republic is about, not a democracy. I believe you have some brushing up to do on ideologies.

The only way to defend "the inherent rights" of people is through the Rule of Law (government) not the Rule of Man (libertarianism).

Read the Declaration of Independence, then the U.S. Constitution.

 

[daveman]

Sure is. Maybe Nazi Germany or a nation with an unregulated economy would approach communism.

Impossible. Communism is the total regulation of the economy by the state.

Pay attention, please.

Of course it's possible We are talking about the perceived horrors of a national life: fascism, unregulated economy, communism, libertarianism.

Oh, well, as long as you're just making shit up, sure.

But out here in the real world, there is not now nor has there EVER been a Communist nation with an unregulated economy.

Period.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Libertarians believe in a republic that protects the people by defending their inherent rights outlined in a constitution.

Communism involves controlling the people.

There's a fine line between defending and controlling the populace. Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Castro, Tse-Tung, and every other dictator in history have controlled their populace.

Again, libertarians advocate defending the inherent rights of the populace. That's what a republic is about, not a democracy. I believe you have some brushing up to do on ideologies.

Jakematters believes that if he faithfully posts the material that George Soros and his lieutenants instruct him to post, he will get a paycheck.

 

[daveman]

Uncensored wants to be a libertarian master to terrorize without impediment those who work for him.

Such a fool. He was born 150 years too late.

No such thing as a libertarian master either.

You're just a poo-flinging monkey, aren't you?

 

[Uncensored2008]

No such thing as a libertarian master either.

You're just a poo-flinging monkey, aren't you?

Yes, he is a feral baboon.

 

[daveman]

We have already shown the woefully inadequate nature of the graphic. Go back and look it up if you can't remember. Libertarians are the flip side of the coin that is communism on the other side.

Libertarians believe in a republic that protects the people by defending their inherent rights outlined in a constitution.

Communism involves controlling the people.

There's a fine line between defending and controlling the populace. Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Castro, Tse-Tung, and every other dictator in history have controlled their populace.

Again, libertarians advocate defending the inherent rights of the populace. That's what a republic is about, not a democracy. I believe you have some brushing up to do on ideologies.

Fakey is a 20-year-old kid with a semester of Poli Sci 101.

 

[JakeStarkey]

And we see the libertarian loonies rave here on the Board.

Whatta buncha sillies.

You know why your numbers are so law in % per capita, doncha? It ain't causa your smarts!

 

[Uncensored2008]

And we see the libertarian loonies rave here on the Board.

Whatta buncha sillies.

You know why your numbers are so law in % per capita, doncha? It ain't causa your smarts!

Get thee to a baboonary, monkey boi.

 

[LibertyLemming]

I wonder how long till everyone just ignores Jake?

 

[Uncensored2008]

I wonder how long till everyone just ignores Jake?

He's fun to poke with a sharp stick. I doubt anyone takes him seriously.

 

[daveman]

I wonder how long till everyone just ignores Jake?

He's fun to poke with a sharp stick. I doubt anyone takes him seriously.

His fellow far leftists do. They thank his posts all the time, and I expect that's where the vast majority of his rep comes from.

 

[thanatos144]

We have already shown the woefully inadequate nature of the graphic. Go back and look it up if you can't remember. Libertarians are the flip side of the coin that is communism on the other side.

Libertarians believe in a republic that protects the people by defending their inherent rights outlined in a constitution.

Communism involves controlling the people.

There's a fine line between defending and controlling the populace. Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Castro, Tse-Tung, and every other dictator in history have controlled their populace.

Again, libertarians advocate defending the inherent rights of the populace. That's what a republic is about, not a democracy. I believe you have some brushing up to do on ideologies.

Fakey is a 20-year-old kid with a semester of Poli Sci 101.

20? How do you come up with him being that old? I would have said 14

 

[tooAlive]

And we see the libertarian loonies rave here on the Board.

Whatta buncha sillies.

You know why your numbers are so law in % per capita, doncha? It ain't causa your smarts!

 

[Uncensored2008]

His fellow far leftists do. They thank his posts all the time, and I expect that's where the vast majority of his rep comes from.

Of course. Jillian, Truthmatters, Rightwinger, del, Ravi, Chris - the intellectual peers of Jakematters who hold the same views - provided by George Soros, of course!

 

[tooAlive]

We have already shown the woefully inadequate nature of the graphic. Go back and look it up if you can't remember. Libertarians are the flip side of the coin that is communism on the other side.

Libertarians believe in a republic that protects the people by defending their inherent rights outlined in a constitution.

Communism involves controlling the people.

There's a fine line between defending and controlling the populace. Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Castro, Tse-Tung, and every other dictator in history have controlled their populace.

Again, libertarians advocate defending the inherent rights of the populace. That's what a republic is about, not a democracy. I believe you have some brushing up to do on ideologies.

The only way to defend "the inherent rights" of people is through the Rule of Law (government) not the Rule of Man (libertarianism).

Read the Declaration of Independence, then the U.S. Constitution.

Exactly! That's why I said that libertarians advocate for a republic!

NOT a democracy. So libertarianism is obviously not the rule of man.

Do you recognize this?

I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

 

[daveman]

Libertarians believe in a republic that protects the people by defending their inherent rights outlined in a constitution.

Communism involves controlling the people.

There's a fine line between defending and controlling the populace. Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Castro, Tse-Tung, and every other dictator in history have controlled their populace.

Again, libertarians advocate defending the inherent rights of the populace. That's what a republic is about, not a democracy. I believe you have some brushing up to do on ideologies.

Fakey is a 20-year-old kid with a semester of Poli Sci 101.

20? How do you come up with him being that old? I would have said 14

All is revealed.