para bellum
Diamond Member
Kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, species.
These are labels created by humans to try to make order from chaos. The Linnaean system of classification predates genetics, and has been supplanted in biology by the cladistic system based on genomic analysis.
"Darwinism" is also a label- there is no science of "Darwinism". It's usually used as a perjorative, but these statements are not grounded in science- they are grounded in labels.
Yes, biological evolution is real. Yes, all life on earth shares a common ancestor. The chirality of DNA, and the large group of common genetic sequences shared by all life illustrates this.
The demand for eyewitness speciation is a relic of Linnaean taxonomy, it's not how biology is really viewed. When enough mutations in a species happen to warrant a new clade, a new clade is named. It doesn't mean a switch has been flipped, it's a cumulative series of changes.
It doesn't really mean anything- it's just a way of describing something that brings it down to a human level of understanding.
Life evolves, it changes. The fossil record shows that.
You want to disprove biological evolution? Find a fossil of a flowering plant that predates insects. That would put a stake through the heart of evolutionary theory since all flowering plants need insects for pollination.
The term "theory" in the scientific context does not imply uncertainty. Biological evolution is every bit as successful as Quantum Mechanics or General Relativity in it's ability to make predictions (and be disproved).
Also it does not speak to the origin of life- that is beyond the reach of evolution. Evolution only talks about how life has changed, not how it began.
These are labels created by humans to try to make order from chaos. The Linnaean system of classification predates genetics, and has been supplanted in biology by the cladistic system based on genomic analysis.
"Darwinism" is also a label- there is no science of "Darwinism". It's usually used as a perjorative, but these statements are not grounded in science- they are grounded in labels.
Yes, biological evolution is real. Yes, all life on earth shares a common ancestor. The chirality of DNA, and the large group of common genetic sequences shared by all life illustrates this.
The demand for eyewitness speciation is a relic of Linnaean taxonomy, it's not how biology is really viewed. When enough mutations in a species happen to warrant a new clade, a new clade is named. It doesn't mean a switch has been flipped, it's a cumulative series of changes.
It doesn't really mean anything- it's just a way of describing something that brings it down to a human level of understanding.
Life evolves, it changes. The fossil record shows that.
You want to disprove biological evolution? Find a fossil of a flowering plant that predates insects. That would put a stake through the heart of evolutionary theory since all flowering plants need insects for pollination.
The term "theory" in the scientific context does not imply uncertainty. Biological evolution is every bit as successful as Quantum Mechanics or General Relativity in it's ability to make predictions (and be disproved).
Also it does not speak to the origin of life- that is beyond the reach of evolution. Evolution only talks about how life has changed, not how it began.
Last edited: