Can We Trust Courts to Stop Trump's Lawlessness?

‘Just following the mass of litigation against the second Trump Administration can be a full-time job.

One leading tracker currently identifies 244 distinct cases filed against the administration. Many of these cases have been through multiple stages: temporary restraining orders, preliminary injunctions, summary judgment motions, enforcement and contempt proceedings, and appeals (and requests for stays) at each stage — in a number of instances going all the way to the Supreme Court. And Trump’s been back in office for a mere four months!

Even the past weeks have been dizzying. On May 16, the Supreme Court issued its latest ruling in A.A.R.P. v. Trump. (The letters “A.A.R.P.” here are the initials of the person who filed the lawsuit, not the well-known advocacy organization for older Americans.) The Court seemed to take a strong stand against Trump’s mass deportations. It issued an injunction preventing the deportation of immigrants under the Alien Enemies Act without due process, and it held that “notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster.”

Yet on May 19 — the very next business day — the Court issued an order that had the effect of removing “Temporary Protected Status” from over 300,000 Venezuelan immigrants, thus clearing an obstacle to their deportation. As one leading immigration lawyer noted, “This is the largest single action stripping any group of non-citizens of immigration status in modern U.S. history. That the Supreme Court authorized it in a two-paragraph order with no reasoning is truly shocking.” Only Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson noted her dissent.’


“Can We Trust Courts to Stop Trump's Lawlessness?”

Not the Supreme Court, clearly.

The lower courts have demonstrated a willingness to do so – but trusting the courts really isn’t the issue or concern.

Of concern is Trump’s criminality and lawlessness when it comes to ignoring the courts, refusing to obey orders and injunctions, relentlessly violating the law and Constitution with impunity.
Since he hasn’t engaged in any lawlessness, your thread headline question is entirely disingenuous. And, as usual, your thread is retarded. Like you are.
 
‘Just following the mass of litigation against the second Trump Administration can be a full-time job.

One leading tracker currently identifies 244 distinct cases filed against the administration. Many of these cases have been through multiple stages: temporary restraining orders, preliminary injunctions, summary judgment motions, enforcement and contempt proceedings, and appeals (and requests for stays) at each stage — in a number of instances going all the way to the Supreme Court. And Trump’s been back in office for a mere four months!

Even the past weeks have been dizzying. On May 16, the Supreme Court issued its latest ruling in A.A.R.P. v. Trump. (The letters “A.A.R.P.” here are the initials of the person who filed the lawsuit, not the well-known advocacy organization for older Americans.) The Court seemed to take a strong stand against Trump’s mass deportations. It issued an injunction preventing the deportation of immigrants under the Alien Enemies Act without due process, and it held that “notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster.”

Yet on May 19 — the very next business day — the Court issued an order that had the effect of removing “Temporary Protected Status” from over 300,000 Venezuelan immigrants, thus clearing an obstacle to their deportation. As one leading immigration lawyer noted, “This is the largest single action stripping any group of non-citizens of immigration status in modern U.S. history. That the Supreme Court authorized it in a two-paragraph order with no reasoning is truly shocking.” Only Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson noted her dissent.’


“Can We Trust Courts to Stop Trump's Lawlessness?”

Not the Supreme Court, clearly.

The lower courts have demonstrated a willingness to do so – but trusting the courts really isn’t the issue or concern.

Of concern is Trump’s criminality and lawlessness when it comes to ignoring the courts, refusing to obey orders and injunctions, relentlessly violating the law and Constitution with impunity.
When these judges get reversed you don't hear about that... but they are and the rest will too... all they can do is delay they can't stop us... even if they run out the clock on Trump Vance will win in a landslide....
 
In other words, you have zero combat experience and fought your war at the donut shop while sucking on someone else's tit.

\
No donut shops, but I did make sure to be in maintenance and not on the front lines.
 
When these judges get reversed you don't hear about that... but they are and the rest will too... all they can do is delay they can't stop us... even if they run out the clock on Trump Vance will win in a landslide....

We are scheduling the American Civil war in Nov 2026 like we do every 2 years.
 
When these judges get reversed you don't hear about that... but they are and the rest will too... all they can do is delay they can't stop us... even if they run out the clock on Trump Vance will win in a landslide....
Some will get reversed on jurisdictional grounds (independent of the facts of the case) but most will / have been upheld.
 
No donut shops, but I did make sure to be in maintenance and not on the front lines.

Does that mean you fixed the Donut Machines in the Back instead of being out front where the real action is?
 
If you watch these violent fascist libs the war has already begun....

Ooh, the fear, the fear. Hate to break it to you but I don't fear you MAGAts. One already threatened to shoot me. I just answered that he signed his own death warrant. He's a convicted Felon (child molester) who cannot now legally possess an firearms or knives of a certain length. It unnerved him so much that he went down the street and be a young kid with a rock. Yes, he's pending trail. Viewing the situation, if I see him outside with a firearm there will be reason to believe that he's out to kill either me or others. You MAGAts keep mistaking us armed Fiscal Conservatives with mild mannered Democrats that you think you can bully.
\

Again, in Nov 2026, another American Civil war will be fought but at the ballot box.
 
Ooh, the fear, the fear. Hate to break it to you but I don't fear you MAGAts. One already threatened to shoot me. I just answered that he signed his own death warrant. He's a convicted Felon (child molester) who cannot now legally possess an firearms or knives of a certain length. It unnerved him so much that he went down the street and be a young kid with a rock. Yes, he's pending trail. Viewing the situation, if I see him outside with a firearm there will be reason to believe that he's out to kill either me or others. You MAGAts keep mistaking us armed Fiscal Conservatives with mild mannered Democrats that you think you can bully.
\

Again, in Nov 2026, another American Civil war will be fought but at the ballot box.
Wow, what a violent post
 
15th post
Wow, what a violent post

I meet violence with violence. You want to jeopardize those around you, there are many of us that will not tolerate your nonsense. If you want peace, be peaceful.
 

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom