Can We Trust Courts to Stop Trump's Lawlessness?

C_Clayton_Jones

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
80,461
Reaction score
42,712
Points
2,605
Location
In a Republic, actually
‘Just following the mass of litigation against the second Trump Administration can be a full-time job.

One leading tracker currently identifies 244 distinct cases filed against the administration. Many of these cases have been through multiple stages: temporary restraining orders, preliminary injunctions, summary judgment motions, enforcement and contempt proceedings, and appeals (and requests for stays) at each stage — in a number of instances going all the way to the Supreme Court. And Trump’s been back in office for a mere four months!

Even the past weeks have been dizzying. On May 16, the Supreme Court issued its latest ruling in A.A.R.P. v. Trump. (The letters “A.A.R.P.” here are the initials of the person who filed the lawsuit, not the well-known advocacy organization for older Americans.) The Court seemed to take a strong stand against Trump’s mass deportations. It issued an injunction preventing the deportation of immigrants under the Alien Enemies Act without due process, and it held that “notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster.”

Yet on May 19 — the very next business day — the Court issued an order that had the effect of removing “Temporary Protected Status” from over 300,000 Venezuelan immigrants, thus clearing an obstacle to their deportation. As one leading immigration lawyer noted, “This is the largest single action stripping any group of non-citizens of immigration status in modern U.S. history. That the Supreme Court authorized it in a two-paragraph order with no reasoning is truly shocking.” Only Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson noted her dissent.’


“Can We Trust Courts to Stop Trump's Lawlessness?”

Not the Supreme Court, clearly.

The lower courts have demonstrated a willingness to do so – but trusting the courts really isn’t the issue or concern.

Of concern is Trump’s criminality and lawlessness when it comes to ignoring the courts, refusing to obey orders and injunctions, relentlessly violating the law and Constitution with impunity.
 
‘Just following the mass of litigation against the second Trump Administration can be a full-time job.

One leading tracker currently identifies 244 distinct cases filed against the administration. Many of these cases have been through multiple stages: temporary restraining orders, preliminary injunctions, summary judgment motions, enforcement and contempt proceedings, and appeals (and requests for stays) at each stage — in a number of instances going all the way to the Supreme Court. And Trump’s been back in office for a mere four months!

Even the past weeks have been dizzying. On May 16, the Supreme Court issued its latest ruling in A.A.R.P. v. Trump. (The letters “A.A.R.P.” here are the initials of the person who filed the lawsuit, not the well-known advocacy organization for older Americans.) The Court seemed to take a strong stand against Trump’s mass deportations. It issued an injunction preventing the deportation of immigrants under the Alien Enemies Act without due process, and it held that “notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster.”

Yet on May 19 — the very next business day — the Court issued an order that had the effect of removing “Temporary Protected Status” from over 300,000 Venezuelan immigrants, thus clearing an obstacle to their deportation. As one leading immigration lawyer noted, “This is the largest single action stripping any group of non-citizens of immigration status in modern U.S. history. That the Supreme Court authorized it in a two-paragraph order with no reasoning is truly shocking.” Only Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson noted her dissent.’


“Can We Trust Courts to Stop Trump's Lawlessness?”

Not the Supreme Court, clearly.

The lower courts have demonstrated a willingness to do so – but trusting the courts really isn’t the issue or concern.

Of concern is Trump’s criminality and lawlessness when it comes to ignoring the courts, refusing to obey orders and injunctions, relentlessly violating the law and Constitution with impunity.
Yes there is a lot of lawfare by the demafasict

They’ll lose.
 
Illegal aliens that ignored the process of entering the country legally now demand "due process".

The due process is GTFO.

Just like a trespasser, you don't get to stay until your court date then your removed. You go the fuck home and if you want to legally enter the country, you can feel free to instigate that process from the comfort of whatever country you're a citizen of. Need a court date? No problem... welcome to the world of instant Internet video communications. You can pursue your legal remedies from anywhere in the world.
 
‘Just following the mass of litigation against the second Trump Administration can be a full-time job.

One leading tracker currently identifies 244 distinct cases filed against the administration. Many of these cases have been through multiple stages: temporary restraining orders, preliminary injunctions, summary judgment motions, enforcement and contempt proceedings, and appeals (and requests for stays) at each stage — in a number of instances going all the way to the Supreme Court. And Trump’s been back in office for a mere four months!

Even the past weeks have been dizzying. On May 16, the Supreme Court issued its latest ruling in A.A.R.P. v. Trump. (The letters “A.A.R.P.” here are the initials of the person who filed the lawsuit, not the well-known advocacy organization for older Americans.) The Court seemed to take a strong stand against Trump’s mass deportations. It issued an injunction preventing the deportation of immigrants under the Alien Enemies Act without due process, and it held that “notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster.”

Yet on May 19 — the very next business day — the Court issued an order that had the effect of removing “Temporary Protected Status” from over 300,000 Venezuelan immigrants, thus clearing an obstacle to their deportation. As one leading immigration lawyer noted, “This is the largest single action stripping any group of non-citizens of immigration status in modern U.S. history. That the Supreme Court authorized it in a two-paragraph order with no reasoning is truly shocking.” Only Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson noted her dissent.’


“Can We Trust Courts to Stop Trump's Lawlessness?”

Not the Supreme Court, clearly.

The lower courts have demonstrated a willingness to do so – but trusting the courts really isn’t the issue or concern.

Of concern is Trump’s criminality and lawlessness when it cTomes to ignoring the courts, refusing to obey orders and injunctions, relentlessly violating the law and Constitution with impunity.
The fact of the matter is the democrats lost their ability as a coalition to obstruct any government progress in 2024 and as a fall-back they have mobilized leftist judges to run the obstruction. Again to you and your ilk. The gaslighting and obstruction have run their course. They don't work anymore. Try governing with the best interest of the country in the forefront instead of trying to destroy the country.
 
‘Just following the mass of litigation against the second Trump Administration can be a full-time job.

One leading tracker currently identifies 244 distinct cases filed against the administration. Many of these cases have been through multiple stages: temporary restraining orders, preliminary injunctions, summary judgment motions, enforcement and contempt proceedings, and appeals (and requests for stays) at each stage — in a number of instances going all the way to the Supreme Court. And Trump’s been back in office for a mere four months!

Even the past weeks have been dizzying. On May 16, the Supreme Court issued its latest ruling in A.A.R.P. v. Trump. (The letters “A.A.R.P.” here are the initials of the person who filed the lawsuit, not the well-known advocacy organization for older Americans.) The Court seemed to take a strong stand against Trump’s mass deportations. It issued an injunction preventing the deportation of immigrants under the Alien Enemies Act without due process, and it held that “notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster.”

Yet on May 19 — the very next business day — the Court issued an order that had the effect of removing “Temporary Protected Status” from over 300,000 Venezuelan immigrants, thus clearing an obstacle to their deportation. As one leading immigration lawyer noted, “This is the largest single action stripping any group of non-citizens of immigration status in modern U.S. history. That the Supreme Court authorized it in a two-paragraph order with no reasoning is truly shocking.” Only Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson noted her dissent.’


“Can We Trust Courts to Stop Trump's Lawlessness?”

Not the Supreme Court, clearly.

The lower courts have demonstrated a willingness to do so – but trusting the courts really isn’t the issue or concern.

Of concern is Trump’s criminality and lawlessness when it comes to ignoring the courts, refusing to obey orders and injunctions, relentlessly violating the law and Constitution with impunity.
Can we just stop your endless fucking sniveling?
 
“Can We Trust Courts to Stop Trump's Lawlessness?”.
I’m more concerned about what we need to do to get the courts out of the way of the POTUS doing what needs to be done to fix this country. Especially since those in the judiciary have created so many of these problems to begin with.
 
‘Just following the mass of litigation against the second Trump Administration can be a full-time job.

One leading tracker currently identifies 244 distinct cases filed against the administration. Many of these cases have been through multiple stages: temporary restraining orders, preliminary injunctions, summary judgment motions, enforcement and contempt proceedings, and appeals (and requests for stays) at each stage — in a number of instances going all the way to the Supreme Court. And Trump’s been back in office for a mere four months!

Even the past weeks have been dizzying. On May 16, the Supreme Court issued its latest ruling in A.A.R.P. v. Trump. (The letters “A.A.R.P.” here are the initials of the person who filed the lawsuit, not the well-known advocacy organization for older Americans.) The Court seemed to take a strong stand against Trump’s mass deportations. It issued an injunction preventing the deportation of immigrants under the Alien Enemies Act without due process, and it held that “notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster.”

Yet on May 19 — the very next business day — the Court issued an order that had the effect of removing “Temporary Protected Status” from over 300,000 Venezuelan immigrants, thus clearing an obstacle to their deportation. As one leading immigration lawyer noted, “This is the largest single action stripping any group of non-citizens of immigration status in modern U.S. history. That the Supreme Court authorized it in a two-paragraph order with no reasoning is truly shocking.” Only Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson noted her dissent.’


“Can We Trust Courts to Stop Trump's Lawlessness?”

Not the Supreme Court, clearly.

The lower courts have demonstrated a willingness to do so – but trusting the courts really isn’t the issue or concern.

Of concern is Trump’s criminality and lawlessness when it comes to ignoring the courts, refusing to obey orders and injunctions, relentlessly violating the law and Constitution with impunity.
Where in the hell did you ever get the idea that a district Judge can usurp the authority of the President of the United States?
 
Back
Top Bottom