Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That's just the diversion to keep our "eye off the ball". While all this hoopla is going on regarding bonuses, they're executing generational theft with scalpel like precision. Another campaign prophecy being fulfilled...true, we must admit its hilarious to see congress with all that phony outrage over AIG when congress cant even control itself.
Agree, everyone who makes over 250k should be taxed 90%.
"On moral grounds, then, we could argue for a flat income tax of 90 percent to return that wealth to its real owners. In the United States, even a flat tax of 70 percent would support all governmental programs (about half the total tax) and allow payment, with the remainder, of a patrimony of about $8,000 per annum per inhabitant, or $25,000 for a family of three. This would generously leave with the original recipients of the income about three times what, according to my rough guess, they had earned."
UBI and the Flat Tax
Agree, everyone who makes over 250k should be taxed 90%.
"On moral grounds, then, we could argue for a flat income tax of 90 percent to return that wealth to its real owners. In the United States, even a flat tax of 70 percent would support all governmental programs (about half the total tax) and allow payment, with the remainder, of a patrimony of about $8,000 per annum per inhabitant, or $25,000 for a family of three. This would generously leave with the original recipients of the income about three times what, according to my rough guess, they had earned."
UBI and the Flat Tax
Are the real owners the people that actually earned the money or the people that wait by the mailbox a certain day every month ? .....
Agree, everyone who makes over 250k should be taxed 90%.
"On moral grounds, then, we could argue for a flat income tax of 90 percent to return that wealth to its real owners. In the United States, even a flat tax of 70 percent would support all governmental programs (about half the total tax) and allow payment, with the remainder, of a patrimony of about $8,000 per annum per inhabitant, or $25,000 for a family of three. This would generously leave with the original recipients of the income about three times what, according to my rough guess, they had earned."
UBI and the Flat Tax
afterall, they have given us an 11 trillion and growing deficit. all their money should be taxed to help pay down the deficit.
CAN we tax members of congress at 90%?
Agree, everyone who makes over 250k should be taxed 90%.
"On moral grounds, then, we could argue for a flat income tax of 90 percent to return that wealth to its real owners. In the United States, even a flat tax of 70 percent would support all governmental programs (about half the total tax) and allow payment, with the remainder, of a patrimony of about $8,000 per annum per inhabitant, or $25,000 for a family of three. This would generously leave with the original recipients of the income about three times what, according to my rough guess, they had earned."
UBI and the Flat Tax
according to the constitution, the individual owns his or her wealth...what you advocate is a destruction of the constitution, you are an enemy to this country.
according to the constitution, the individual owns his or her wealth...what you advocate is a destruction of the constitution, you are an enemy to this country.
That was actually dumber than your usually inane replies, try again, I'll give you a hint, consider that word you used 'property' in the context of the argument. And for Pavlov fans, 'the constitution' is another saliva trigger.
"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
according to the constitution, the individual owns his or her wealth...what you advocate is a destruction of the constitution, you are an enemy to this country.
That was actually dumber than your usually inane replies, try again, I'll give you a hint, consider that word you used 'property' in the context of the argument. And for Pavlov fans, 'the constitution' is another saliva trigger.
"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
according to the constitution, the individual owns his or her wealth...what you advocate is a destruction of the constitution, you are an enemy to this country.
That was actually dumber than your usually inane replies, try again, I'll give you a hint, consider that word you used 'property' in the context of the argument. And for Pavlov fans, 'the constitution' is another saliva trigger.
"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
notice the difference
you are nothing but a hack...try reading the 5th amendment and i am glad you admit that when i said wealth that wealth is property....and the preamble is not the law in this case, the constitution is....funny how you don't know the difference
according to the constitution, the individual owns his or her wealth...what you advocate is a destruction of the constitution, you are an enemy to this country.
That was actually dumber than your usually inane replies, try again, I'll give you a hint, consider that word you used 'property' in the context of the argument. And for Pavlov fans, 'the constitution' is another saliva trigger.
"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
notice the difference
you are nothing but a hack...try reading the 5th amendment and i am glad you admit that when i said wealth that wealth is property....and the preamble is not the law in this case, the constitution is....funny how you don't know the difference
And you are a fool, your compensation under the laws of the land is we allow fools like you the same rights as the good citizens. You live here, thus you pay. Funny how you wingnuts stress this word or phrase over the other. But you didn't address my question, given you earn little on your own, what excuses you from paying your fair rate? And given your off base replies, you should now pay 95 percent. lol
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
PS why are not on that circle jerk site, DP?
and your sentence makes no sense and i fail to see why you find it necessary to bash another site....that you have posted on and got your ass kicked in debate after debate...no wonder you have to insult it, chicken
and your sentence makes no sense and i fail to see why you find it necessary to bash another site....that you have posted on and got your ass kicked in debate after debate...no wonder you have to insult it, chicken
Name calling is the final resource for those who cannot defend their ideas. DP bans thought, figured you knew that by now.
and your sentence makes no sense and i fail to see why you find it necessary to bash another site....that you have posted on and got your ass kicked in debate after debate...no wonder you have to insult it, chicken
Name calling is the final resource for those who cannot defend their ideas. DP bans thought, figured you knew that by now.
