Can the Trump supporters explain something to me?

[Independent thinker]

With RINO's, they'll just find something else just as stupid to spend our money on. Trump spent trillions on a flu shot.

I know of no one on the right, RINO or otherwise, who has wanted to spend 50 trillion dollars in addition to the 34 trillion dollars we already owe.

 

[YoursTruly]

Ironically, it's the only practical solution, even if they know not what they do.

I don't see anything practical about todays Republicans.

 

[YoursTruly]

I know of no one on the right, RHINO or otherwise, who has wanted to spend 50 trillion dollars in addition to the 34 trillion dollars we already owe.

It's RINO. Not RHINO. Republican in name only.

And I don't know of any GOP voter who wants increased national debt, debt ceiling or deficit. But I do know a lot of people who vote for those same Republicans who have increased all of those, Time after time.
And they still can't figure out why those things keep increasing. So they blame the democrats.

 

[JohnDB]

 

[hadit]

there is a very simple explanation.

Trump is a pathological liar and an incompetent businessman

That has amassed a large amount of money being a businessman. Isn't success in business an indicator of competence in business? As for lying, are you really going to expect ALL politicians to tell the truth? I hate to laugh at someone for being naive, but seriously.

 

[Natural Citizen]

I don't see anything practical about todays Republicans.

I don't see much of a nickel's worth of genuine difference between a D or an R at that level of politics.

The problem is the monetary policy itself. This has always been the root problem.

It is designed to fail.

I see em as just speeding up the inevitable by trying to hurry up and build more road to kick the can down once they start realizing they've already run out of road a long time ago to kick it down any farther

Those who understand wil be fine.

Those who do not...well...you get what you deserve. Maybe it'll be a long-overdue wakeup call.

 

[jc456]

It's RINO. Not RHINO. Republican in name only.

And I don't know of any GOP voter who wants increased national debt, debt ceiling or deficit. But I do know a lot of people who vote for those same Republicans who have increased all of those, Time after time.
And they still can't figure out why those things keep increasing. So they blame the democrats.

I want line item veto

 

[Independent thinker]

It's RINO. Not RHINO. Republican in name only.

And I don't know of any GOP voter who wants increased national debt, debt ceiling or deficit. But I do know a lot of people who vote for those same Republicans who have increased all of those, Time after time.
And they still can't figure out why those things keep increasing. So they blame the democrats.

Thanks for the lesson but a typo is a typo. Lesson not needed. I forgot you are one of those Libertarian losers who are almost gone from existence, with no one even trying to save you from total extinction. Chase Oliver's goal was to get 2% of the vote (whoopie) and he only got 1% of the vote. Your only purpose in life is just to complain about others instead of actually doing something to get more than 1% of the vote. And, you actually have no idea what Chase Oliver would have accomplished even if he was president. More than likely, it would have been nothing. Then, what would you have done?

 

[YoursTruly]

I don't see much of a nickel's worth of genuine difference between a D or an R at that level of politics.

The problem is the monetary policy itself. This has always been the root problem.

It is designed to fail.

I see em as just speeding up the inevitable by trying to hurry up and build more road to kick the can down once they start realizing they've already run out of road a long time ago to kick it down any farther

Those who understand wil be fine.

Those who do not...well...you get what you deserve. Maybe it'll be a long-overdue wakeup call.

That spells out to be a 1991 USSR/Russia type depression. Or worse.
Republicans (and most Americans), when this happens, will demand fiscal conservatism.

So we're going to have to have conservative government again. It can happen soon, the hard way. Or it'll happen later, the extremely hard way. But there's no way around it.

It's like math. It's absolute.

Although, worst case scenario, we go into a south America type socialist type government first. Then after decades of that not working, we get a Milei type president. Which is what we need here, now.

 

[YoursTruly]

Thanks for the lesson but a typo is a typo. Lesson not needed. I forgot you are one of those Libertarian losers who are almost gone from existence, with no one even trying to save you from total extinction. Chase Oliver's goal was to get 2% of the vote (whoopie) and he only got 1% of the vote. Your only purpose in life is just to complain about others instead of actually doing something to get more than 1% of the vote. And, you actually have no idea what Chase Oliver would have accomplished even if he was president. More than likely, it would have been nothing. Then, what would you have done?

You're welcome.

The libertarians of today lean too far left for me. But you are correct, they are losers. Always whining and crying about legalizing drugs, bashing police and defending tranny's.

And no, that's not my "goal."

 

[YoursTruly]

I want line item veto

Then stop supporting & electing RINO's.

 

[Independent thinker]

You're welcome.

The libertarians of today lean too far left for me. But you are correct, they are losers. Always whining and crying about legalizing drugs, bashing police and defending tranny's.

And no, that's not my "goal."

Apparently your goal, while it may be well intentioned, is a loser as well. That's the very same thing Democrats do is pass bills with good intentions and then refusing to admit that their ideas aren't working.

 

[jc456]

Then stop supporting & electing RINO's.

never voted for a rino in my life. Dick Durban represents me along with Tammi Duckworth, both demfoks. Never voted for either of them. I've never had a senator represent my views.

 

[Billiejeens]

Ummmmmmm, in my post you quoted, I said that Trump doesn't want to spend 50 trillion dollars fighting mother nature while Democrats do. We need to keep Democrats away from the purse strings because that's how much they want to spend fighting mother nature, not even counting everything else they want to spend.

Purists like YT are worse that Democrats in some respects.

You don't expect help from Democrats.

The hard-core fiscal conservatives are completely mathematically challenged.

They think that 3 or 4 of them can rule over the masses that don't agree with them.
Like most losers who can't compete, they take their ball and go home.

 

[jc456]

Purists like YT are worse that Democrats in some respects.

You don't expect help from Democrats.

The hard-core fiscal conservatives are completely mathematically challenged.

They think that 3 or 4 of them can rule over the masses that don't agree with them.
Like most losers who can't compete, they take their ball and go home.

YT is an enabler.

 

[YoursTruly]

Apparently your goal, while it may be well intentioned, is a loser as well. That's the very same thing Democrats do is pass bills with good intentions and then refusing to admit that their ideas aren't working.

A loser, why? Because i'm a fiscal conservative. And that fiscal conservatives are outnumbered by moderates? Last time I checked, the democrats and moderates have been in the majority for a long time now. And for a long time now, the country has been going in the wrong direction. The debt, deficit and debt ceiling has constantly been growing while the value of the USD has been shrinking.
Wages have been increasing, but the value of those wages hasn't.

So you can bash us FC's all you want. But it's the moderates and the democrats together who have been in power for decades, who are creating this mess.

 

[Contumacious]

Trump campaigned on cutting spending and the size of government. That's something that fiscal conservatives like Massie and Chip Roy have been doing since they were elected the first time. It's one of the biggest reasons why Trump was elected both times.
We all know that government spending is out of control. We know the size and scope of government is also out of control.
Just in the last month, Trump has threatened to get us involved in wars that have nothing to do with us. He's promised to created more government. He's gone from publicly supporting smaller, more transparent bills to now wanting a HUGE reconciliation bill with everything in it. "One big beautiful bill," as he calls it. One that's is already partially written and spends way more than the last one. The H1B can't go without being mentioned also. Supporting H1B's over American graduates.

Without focusing on one single issue/promise, can someone explain to me where the fiscally conservative Trump went to? Because he's not even in office yet and is already changing his stance on some important issues. This was supposed to be the new and improved Trump. But it seems like it's the same one that got elected in 2016.

The Socialist Demon Rats love to pretend that they have been living in a Foxhole for the past 4 years:

1- The OP did not explain where we would get the dough to return over 15,000,000 illegals home
2- Nor did he explain where the money would come from in order to correct - reverse- the atrocious mismanagement that have occurred in the past 4 years
3- Joe BuyThem INTENTIONALLY depleted FEMA funds in order to force President Trump to demand more funds

Stop faking , you know the reason additional monies are necessary

 

[Billiejeens]

LMAO..

The acronym RINO came about when 99% of Republicans were fiscally conservative. So when someone like Reagan came along, who wanted to balloon the debt by dumping a lot of new money into the economy, reduce interest rates and increase the debt ceiling, they were labeled RINO. Simply because they weren't conservative.
They were the actual "fringe."

RINO's of today want to make out like fiscal conservatives are the fringe.

Out of the 535 members of Congress, how many are fiscal conservatives?

 

[YoursTruly]

Purists like YT are worse that Democrats in some respects.

You don't expect help from Democrats.

The hard-core fiscal conservatives are completely mathematically challenged.

They think that 3 or 4 of them can rule over the masses that don't agree with them.
Like most losers who can't compete, they take their ball and go home.

I don't expect the democrats to do anything good. But I do expect the GOP, who campaigns on and promises fiscal conservatism, to actually do it. Otherwise they're no better than the democrats.

 

[gmeyers1944]

Trump is already planning to cut taxes and increase spending. That's a horrible way to manage a budget. In fact, it's insane, because tax cuts have never ever paid for themselves.

Tax cuts do pay for themselves. They did when Reagan was president and they did when John Kennedy was president.