You dumbasses have been playing this game for 4 years. Where were you when Bush took a surplus to a record deficit and ruined the economy in the process. Are you people aware there are statements from Bush and Cheney saying deficits don't matter? Are you aware that the Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan didn't want the government buying pack government debt, because it's used to secure bank loans from the Fed. Didn't you notice you were fighting two wars and not paying for them? Don't you remember the tax cuts for the rich? Once Republicans ruined the economy, all of a sudden they want to be fiscally responsible, which is the exact opposite of what a government should do to have a rapid recovery during a recession.
For 4 years, enough time to earn a college degree, the Republicans have signaled they will do the exact opposite of what's needed to improve the economy, while tens of millions of Americans are suffering from what they have already done. It's all part of their "Starve the Beast" strategy to remove social programs and they don't care because the elites behind the Republican Party can accumulate wealth in good times or bad. The Republicans knew how to make the economy better and that's how they knew what to do to keep it from happening.
Hey clueless ... we never had a surplus, the federal government was just shuffling around debt. Do you honestly believe a SIXTEEN TRILLION DOLLAR debt accrued between two administrations AFTER Clinton? Here I thought Bill Maher was the bad comedian.
If taxing the rich helps reduce the debt problem, then explain to me what's California's excuse? They have an income and corporate tax higher than any other state, yet California is suffering from the biggest debt. Exactly how does that fuzzy liberal math of taxing the wealthy work there Einstein? They got plenty of wealth from the riches of Hollywood, and Silicon Valley is very profitable as the location of the nation's technology hub. So what happened to all that surplus???
If Republicans don't care about social programs, why were Obama and the Democrats all to quick to tear apart the new "No Child Left Behind" policy in favor of unions .... because they were too "embarrassed" at how many of our schools were performing?
Why are the liberal Democrats angry about a little "choice and competition" through a school voucher program? If our public education system was really all that great,
why is Obama allowed the choice to prefer a private school instead? Why don't we have "middle class income" families (who Democrats are supposed to represent) able to enjoy the same choice of what's best for their kids? President wants the choice of a rich private school, but the middle class don't deserve the same? How noble of Obama and the Democrats to think of the middle class that way.
Why is the quality of our children's public education system suffering, while the unions are get richer? When does the quality if our education and our kids begin to matter? We have European and Asian kids that can run circles around our nation's "quality" of high school education. Seems the Democrats put a lot more importance into unions than our kids, else our public education system would be second to none.