Can someone making $1 million a year afford a 5.87% tax increase?

[Derideo_Te]

They already understand.

Facts not in evidence!

Comments and reps received seem to say otherwise.

Considering the source says volumes. But whatever, if you don't want to defend your allegation that is up to you. I stand on my position since I can defend it. Thanks for the debate.

 

[ScienceRocks]

A lot easier then the man making 25,000/year.

Fact.

 

[zeke]

Did anyone ever address the question of why in the **** I should care if the very very rich pay more in Federal taxes?

Nah, I didn't think so.

 

[zeke]

Why? Because they receive no more for their money than you do.

You seem to think it is fair to force the rich to pay for what you feel you deserve. Sadly, you deserve only what you acquire through your own efforts.

How about you address the issue of fairness. Tell me why one citizen should pay 20 times as much for the same services.

The issue of fairness you say.

Let me see if I can put this idea in a way that you MIGHT understand. I'll type big.

If the choice is cutting some programs or services that benefits myself or some one else that I care about VS. the raising of taxes on the ultra wealthy by a few percent, (here is the part you need to pay attention to) I DON'T GIVE A **** ABOUT YOUR IDEA OF "FAIRNESS."

Maybe that will explain my position cause you sure as hell didn't explain yours.

Why do you care what amount of taxes some very very rich pay? Or do you think the very very rich are worried about YOU? LMAO.

And I don't care about services that benefit you or your family. Understand? If you need something, get the **** off your ass and earn it.
The "Ultra wealthy" already pay hundreds of time more in taxes than what they receive in benefits, yet you want them to do YOUR job and provide for your family?

I like it when stupid ******* assholes like you and rotty make assumptions about who has what and what is done with it and who provides what to who.

But here is a good bet. When people like you two have to resort to projection and name calling, you have lost the ******* argument.

But if you ever want to compare net worth, let me know. Then again, with you two being the ******* liars that you are, who could trust what you say?

 

[RKMBrown]

Did anyone ever address the question of why in the **** I should care if the very very rich pay more in Federal taxes?

Nah, I didn't think so.

Answering your own questions is a sign of ...

As to your question, yes, nearly everyone addressed the question of why you should care whether rich people are forced to pay more in federal taxes.

 

[RKMBrown]

The issue of fairness you say.

Let me see if I can put this idea in a way that you MIGHT understand. I'll type big.

If the choice is cutting some programs or services that benefits myself or some one else that I care about VS. the raising of taxes on the ultra wealthy by a few percent, (here is the part you need to pay attention to) I DON'T GIVE A **** ABOUT YOUR IDEA OF "FAIRNESS."

Maybe that will explain my position cause you sure as hell didn't explain yours.

Why do you care what amount of taxes some very very rich pay? Or do you think the very very rich are worried about YOU? LMAO.

And I don't care about services that benefit you or your family. Understand? If you need something, get the **** off your ass and earn it.
The "Ultra wealthy" already pay hundreds of time more in taxes than what they receive in benefits, yet you want them to do YOUR job and provide for your family?

I like it when stupid ******* assholes like you and rotty make assumptions about who has what and what is done with it and who provides what to who.

But here is a good bet. When people like you two have to resort to projection and name calling, you have lost the ******* argument.

But if you ever want to compare net worth, let me know. Then again, with you two being the ******* liars that you are, who could trust what you say?

Hypocrite.

 

[Redfish]

The unasked question is: would taking more from the rich solve the country's fiscal mess?

the answer is: NO there are not enough rich people to do that if you took 100% of their income.

 

[P@triot]

Did anyone ever address the question of why in the **** I should care if the very very rich pay more in Federal taxes?

Nah, I didn't think so.

[MENTION=35352]zeke[/MENTION] - we are still waiting for you to address the question of why the **** we should care if the very, very poor pay more in federal taxes?

Nah, we didn't think so.

 

[RKMBrown]

The unasked question is: would taking more from the rich solve the country's fiscal mess?

the answer is: NO there are not enough rich people to do that if you took 100% of their income.

What makes you think socialist / marxist stooges care whether it's enough or not? The point is they must be punished, they being anyone that makes more money than the 50%. Only after all of the assets of the evil rich are redistributed to the majority, and the wicked rich burned at the stake for the crime of effort, will they feel vindicated. Of course exemptions to the culling are available to anyone that pays homage to the democrats.

 

[P@triot]

The issue of fairness you say.

Let me see if I can put this idea in a way that you MIGHT understand. I'll type big.

If the choice is cutting some programs or services that benefits myself or some one else that I care about VS. the raising of taxes on the ultra wealthy by a few percent, (here is the part you need to pay attention to) I DON'T GIVE A **** ABOUT YOUR IDEA OF "FAIRNESS."

Maybe that will explain my position cause you sure as hell didn't explain yours.

Why do you care what amount of taxes some very very rich pay? Or do you think the very very rich are worried about YOU? LMAO.

And I don't care about services that benefit you or your family. Understand? If you need something, get the **** off your ass and earn it.
The "Ultra wealthy" already pay hundreds of time more in taxes than what they receive in benefits, yet you want them to do YOUR job and provide for your family?

I like it when stupid ******* assholes like you and rotty make assumptions about who has what and what is done with it and who provides what to who.

But here is a good bet. When people like you two have to resort to projection and name calling, you have lost the ******* argument.

But if you ever want to compare net worth, let me know. Then again, with you two being the ******* liars that you are, who could trust what you say?

[MENTION=35352]zeke[/MENTION] - then why are you crying like a little *****? If you have amassed such an impressive net worth, why don't you cut a check to the IRS to help close the gap that you are demanding someone else close?

Oh wait - that's right - I forgot you are a greedy hypocrite (ie a Dumbocrat). Like Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Ried and the rest you hoard your wealth while feigning tears for the poor.

Typical Dumbocrat. Not willing to do a damn thing. But happy to sit on their lazy ass demanding someone else do it for them.

 

[P@triot]

The unasked question is: would taking more from the rich solve the country's fiscal mess?

the answer is: NO there are not enough rich people to do that if you took 100% of their income.

What makes you think socialist / marxist stooges care whether it's enough or not? The point is they must be punished, they being anyone that makes more money than the 50%. Only after all of the assets of the evil rich are redistributed to the majority, and the wicked rich burned at the stake for the crime of effort, will they feel vindicated. Of course exemptions to the culling are available to anyone that pays homage to the democrats.

The Dumbocrats like Dierdo and zeke are absolutely ******* repulsive. It's all about one thing with them - a deep, sick envy towards those that have more than they do.

 

[P@triot]

The issue of fairness you say.

Let me see if I can put this idea in a way that you MIGHT understand. I'll type big.

If the choice is cutting some programs or services that benefits myself or some one else that I care about VS. the raising of taxes on the ultra wealthy by a few percent, (here is the part you need to pay attention to) I DON'T GIVE A **** ABOUT YOUR IDEA OF "FAIRNESS."

Maybe that will explain my position cause you sure as hell didn't explain yours.

Why do you care what amount of taxes some very very rich pay? Or do you think the very very rich are worried about YOU? LMAO.

And I don't care about services that benefit you or your family. Understand? If you need something, get the **** off your ass and earn it.
The "Ultra wealthy" already pay hundreds of time more in taxes than what they receive in benefits, yet you want them to do YOUR job and provide for your family?

I like it when stupid ******* assholes like you and rotty make assumptions about who has what and what is done with it and who provides what to who.

But here is a good bet. When people like you two have to resort to projection and name calling, you have lost the ******* argument.

Where did Ernie "name call? He said "get the **** off your ass and EARN it". That's not name calling Sally. What you did ("stupid ******* assholes like you") is "name calling". Once again the Dumbocrat is the only one guilty of what he/she accuses others of...

 

[P@triot]

Did anyone ever address the question of why in the **** I should care if the very very rich pay more in Federal taxes?

Nah, I didn't think so.

 

[RKMBrown]

The unasked question is: would taking more from the rich solve the country's fiscal mess?

the answer is: NO there are not enough rich people to do that if you took 100% of their income.

What makes you think socialist / marxist stooges care whether it's enough or not? The point is they must be punished, they being anyone that makes more money than the 50%. Only after all of the assets of the evil rich are redistributed to the majority, and the wicked rich burned at the stake for the crime of effort, will they feel vindicated. Of course exemptions to the culling are available to anyone that pays homage to the democrats.

The Dumbocrats like Dierdo and zeke are absolutely ******* repulsive. It's all about one thing with them - a deep, sick envy towards those that have more than they do.

If they want to be permanent losers who never go anywhere, never do anything but whine and cry that the hard working Americans are doing better than they are... it's a free country, I say we let them wallow in their self created misery.

Think of it this way, they are doing us all the favor of being poster children for how not to live a good life.

 

[Derideo_Te]

What makes you think socialist / marxist stooges care whether it's enough or not? The point is they must be punished, they being anyone that makes more money than the 50%. Only after all of the assets of the evil rich are redistributed to the majority, and the wicked rich burned at the stake for the crime of effort, will they feel vindicated. Of course exemptions to the culling are available to anyone that pays homage to the democrats.

The Dumbocrats like Dierdo and zeke are absolutely ******* repulsive. It's all about one thing with them - a deep, sick envy towards those that have more than they do.

If they want to be permanent losers who never go anywhere, never do anything but whine and cry that the hard working Americans are doing better than they are... it's a free country, I say we let them wallow in their self created misery.

Think of it this way, they are doing us all the favor of being poster children for how not to live a good life.

More irony!

 

[RKMBrown]

The Dumbocrats like Dierdo and zeke are absolutely ******* repulsive. It's all about one thing with them - a deep, sick envy towards those that have more than they do.

If they want to be permanent losers who never go anywhere, never do anything but whine and cry that the hard working Americans are doing better than they are... it's a free country, I say we let them wallow in their self created misery.

Think of it this way, they are doing us all the favor of being poster children for how not to live a good life.

More irony!

I said dance. Cmon girlie boy, do your best moves for the audience.

 

[Derideo_Te]

If they want to be permanent losers who never go anywhere, never do anything but whine and cry that the hard working Americans are doing better than they are... it's a free country, I say we let them wallow in their self created misery.

Think of it this way, they are doing us all the favor of being poster children for how not to live a good life.

More irony!

I said dance. Cmon girlie boy, do your best moves for the audience.

again!

Do you seriously believe that your puerile taunts are going to do anything more than make me at your expense?

 

[P@triot]

What makes you think socialist / marxist stooges care whether it's enough or not? The point is they must be punished, they being anyone that makes more money than the 50%. Only after all of the assets of the evil rich are redistributed to the majority, and the wicked rich burned at the stake for the crime of effort, will they feel vindicated. Of course exemptions to the culling are available to anyone that pays homage to the democrats.

The Dumbocrats like Dierdo and zeke are absolutely ******* repulsive. It's all about one thing with them - a deep, sick envy towards those that have more than they do.

If they want to be permanent losers who never go anywhere, never do anything but whine and cry that the hard working Americans are doing better than they are... it's a free country, I say we let them wallow in their self created misery.

Think of it this way, they are doing us all the favor of being poster children for how not to live a good life.

 

[Ernie S.]

The Dumbocrats like Dierdo and zeke are absolutely ******* repulsive. It's all about one thing with them - a deep, sick envy towards those that have more than they do.

If they want to be permanent losers who never go anywhere, never do anything but whine and cry that the hard working Americans are doing better than they are... it's a free country, I say we let them wallow in their self created misery.

Think of it this way, they are doing us all the favor of being poster children for how not to live a good life.

Ditto!

 

[P@triot]

More irony!

I said dance. Cmon girlie boy, do your best moves for the audience.

again!

Do you seriously believe that your puerile taunts are going to do anything more than make me at your expense?

Rather than being a snarky prick [MENTION=42916]Derideo_Te[/MENTION], can you articulate (like a mature adult) exactly how much is "wealthy" in your mind and why they should pay so much more in your mind?