Can Masse order the Marshalls to arrest Garland for lying to Congress?

[CrusaderFrank]

So if this passes, Garland can be arrested by the sergeant at Arms and brought before Congress

 

[Natural Citizen]

Massie, one of maybe four or five in congress that follows the constitution.

Pretty much that.

There's nobody in Congress better than Massie, in my view.

 

[Dragonlady]

So if this passes, Garland can be arrested by the sergeant at Arms and brought before Congress

Congress can order NOTHING. They can only recommend that the DOJ issue a warrant for Garland's arrest. What do you think the chances are that Garland will order his own arrest on these charges?

Only the DOJ can issue an arrest warrant. This is performative politics. Just like the Unconstitutional and Invalid Impeachment of Secretary Myorkas.

This is Republicans ginning up your outrage for fundraising clips. And like Pavlov's dogs, you come running to this forum, drolling and barking like fools.

 

[the watcher]

Isn't lying to Congress like telling a whore you love her?

 

[g5000]

Entirely serious.

Americans are behing held in the DC Gulag for over 3 years with no trial date while Garland refuses to tell us how many Federal Agents were inciting the J6 Reichstag Fire.

The DOJ is committing multiple crimes and Garland is complicit.

Should Sen. Masse have Garland arrested?

There is fuck-all in the way of evidence Garland committed perjury.

Especially since dipshit Massie predicated his question on a totally false premise.

Massie is a dickwad trying to prove the entirely bogus conspiracy theory that January 6 was an FBI false flag.

He is putting on theater for the rubes in defense of his orange satanic god.


Fuck Massie and fuck you.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Congress can order NOTHING. They can only recommend that the DOJ issue a warrant for Garland's arrest. What do you think the chances are that Garland will order his own arrest on these charges?

Only the DOJ can issue an arrest warrant. This is performative politics. Just like the Unconstitutional and Invalid Impeachment of Secretary Myorkas.

This is Republicans ginning up your outrage for fundraising clips. And like Pavlov's dogs, you come running to this forum, drolling and barking like fools.

You should have watched the video before defending the glorious 1,000 year democrat Reich

 

[Billiejeens]

There is fuck-all in the way of evidence Garland committed perjury.

Especially since dipshit Massie predicated his question on a totally false premise.

Massie is a dickwad trying to prove the entirely bogus conspiracy theory that January 6 was an FBI false flag.

He is putting on theater for the rubes in defense of his orange satanic god.


Fuck Massie and fuck you.

Oh.
fraud boy is getting frustrated.

 

[Dragonlady]

You should have watched the video before defending the glorious 1,000 year democrat Reich

Why would I watch a video from a woman who doesn't use her real name in Congress, and is crazier than Marjorie Taylor Greene????

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/02/10/anna-paulina-luna-republican-biography/

 

[struth]

Congress can order NOTHING. They can only recommend that the DOJ issue a warrant for Garland's arrest. What do you think the chances are that Garland will order his own arrest on these charges?

Only the DOJ can issue an arrest warrant. This is performative politics. Just like the Unconstitutional and Invalid Impeachment of Secretary Myorkas.

This is Republicans ginning up your outrage for fundraising clips. And like Pavlov's dogs, you come running to this forum, drolling and barking like fools.

Actually the DOJ must go to a the judicial branch and present enough evidence to a neutral and detached magistrate, the magistrate then can issue an arrest warrant

 

[Dragonlady]

Actually the DOJ must go to a the judicial branch and present enough evidence to a neutral and detached magistrate, the magistrate then can issue an arrest warrant

Not on a contempt charge, idiot.

 

[struth]

Not on a contempt charge, idiot.

Contempt of the DOJ? Haha no that comes right from the court