Can Masse order the Marshalls to arrest Garland for lying to Congress?

What proof do you have to offer?
Proof? How can anyone prove he was? All the losers do is make shit up, bs accusations.

It is the norm that AG's do not lie to the Congress. Nixon's AG being an exception, it's interesting a US citizen would believe the AG lies to Congress -- seeing that would open one up to criminal charges.
 
Last edited:


Entirely serious.

Americans are behing held in the DC Gulag for over 3 years with no trial date while Garland refuses to tell us how many Federal Agents were inciting the J6 Reichstag Fire.

The DOJ is committing multiple crimes and Garland is complicit.

Should Sen. Masse have Garland arrested?


Masse is the one who should be arrested for lying to Congress. Even Ken Buck admits the GOP has not proven anything. All Republicans could say was that we all know.
 
Proof? How can anyone prove he was? All the losers do is make shit up, bs accusations.

It is the norm that AG's do not lie to the Congress. Nixon's AG being an exception, it's interesting a US citizen would believe the AG lies to Congress -- seeing that would open one up to criminal charges.
But yet you say he wasn't lying. So what proof do you have that he wasn't lying?
 
Where did I say he was lying? I just asked you for proof to support your opinion that he's not lying.
This is governed by LOGIC. Which says, that you can't prove a negative (ie, he's not lying).
Where the burden of proof of a positive need only site a single example. While proving a negative, would have a burden of an almost infinite number of truths.

This is also why the courts require proving someone guilty, and not the defense prove himself innocent.
 
This is governed by LOGIC. Which says, that you can't prove a negative (ie, he's not lying).
Where the burden of proof of a positive need only site a single example. While proving a negative, would have a burden of an almost infinite number of truths.

This is also why the courts require proving someone guilty, and not the defense prove himself innocent.
Logic that you don't have. Logic dictates that someone said something did or didn't happen they should be able to show what that said to be true.
 
They are also trained to instigate violence among other things. I think you should move on. You are another dime a dozen ass kisser and gloating about the country's destruction makes you A1 prime asshole.

Absolutely
 
Here are my comments to you.



Where did I say he was lying? I just asked you for proof to support your opinion that he's not lying.
No, it's what proof do you have that he is lying.

I hereby accuse Donald Trump of being a drug addict. Prove he is not.
 
Back
Top Bottom