Can and should Kavanuagh sue Ford Thread and Poll

Can and should Kavanuagh sue Ford?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 33 86.8%
  • No

    Votes: 5 13.2%

  • Total voters
    38
Naw, I walked into a lighted bar and I see everyone toasting the new SC Justice. cause I know, it never happened. if it had, there'd be a pattern. there'd be a police report, there'd be someone she told. yep, the psychiatrist tells a different story.

she has no place, no time, nothing. so if you got nothing, you got, nothing.

So you have no answer either.

I'm like frickin' Sandy Koufax out here. Striking everybody out.
Another libtarded self aggrandizer-back patter! Ewe go man!
I have no idea what the fk he's talking about? he ain't got shit. she ain't got shit. it never happened. all she has to do is present a piece of evidence.
He’s like every other libtard on this forum! They are the stupidest things around. Incapable of logic or reason.

I just wiped ewe out with one hand tied behind my back didn't I?
Keep telling yourself that numbnutz!
 
Oboy. Another victim walks straight into the trap, even with a big blinking billboard over it proclaiming "WARNING -- TRAP!"

That's fine, we can accommodate unlimited suckers here. By all means take a turn and do what no one else can ...... essplain to the class how you "know it's false". Be the first to prove a negative.

:eusa_whistle:
Naw, I walked into a lighted bar and I see everyone toasting the new SC Justice. cause I know, it never happened. if it had, there'd be a pattern. there'd be a police report, there'd be someone she told. yep, the psychiatrist tells a different story.

she has no place, no time, nothing. so if you got nothing, you got, nothing.

So you have no answer either.

I'm like frickin' Sandy Koufax out here. Striking everybody out.
Another libtarded self aggrandizer-back patter! Ewe go man!
I have no idea what the fk he's talking about? he ain't got shit. she ain't got shit. it never happened. all she has to do is present a piece of evidence.
He’s like every other libtard on this forum! They are the stupidest things around. Incapable of logic or reason.
I love it. he doesn't provide any question and then says I didn't answer his question. :dunno: dude's got a mental disorder. Now he's mentioning Peewee Herman.
dunno.gif
these leftists really are coming apart at the seams it seems.
 
So you have no answer either.

I'm like frickin' Sandy Koufax out here. Striking everybody out.
Another libtarded self aggrandizer-back patter! Ewe go man!
I have no idea what the fk he's talking about? he ain't got shit. she ain't got shit. it never happened. all she has to do is present a piece of evidence.
He’s like every other libtard on this forum! They are the stupidest things around. Incapable of logic or reason.

I just wiped ewe out with one hand tied behind my back didn't I?
Keep telling yourself that numbnutz!

Keep failing to substantiate your claim, and I sure will. :thup:
 
Naw, I walked into a lighted bar and I see everyone toasting the new SC Justice. cause I know, it never happened. if it had, there'd be a pattern. there'd be a police report, there'd be someone she told. yep, the psychiatrist tells a different story.

she has no place, no time, nothing. so if you got nothing, you got, nothing.

So you have no answer either.

I'm like frickin' Sandy Koufax out here. Striking everybody out.
Another libtarded self aggrandizer-back patter! Ewe go man!
I have no idea what the fk he's talking about? he ain't got shit. she ain't got shit. it never happened. all she has to do is present a piece of evidence.
He’s like every other libtard on this forum! They are the stupidest things around. Incapable of logic or reason.

I just wiped ewe out with one hand tied behind my back didn't I? Here's your logic: "burden of proof".
Look it up.

Next time plan ahead before stepping into quicksand and then denying the existence of quicksand.
dude you're far too clever for this board. you should move on and find yourself somewhere where you can enjoy a debate.
 
Another libtarded self aggrandizer-back patter! Ewe go man!
I have no idea what the fk he's talking about? he ain't got shit. she ain't got shit. it never happened. all she has to do is present a piece of evidence.
He’s like every other libtard on this forum! They are the stupidest things around. Incapable of logic or reason.

I just wiped ewe out with one hand tied behind my back didn't I?
Keep telling yourself that numbnutz!

Keep failing to substantiate your claim, and I sure will. :thup:
substantiate what claim? I don't need to prove a negative. no, no, you prove there is a report about the incident or else you hold nothing but yourself in your fingers.
 
They just reported on Fox that Grassley tried to get Feinstein to talk with he, Feinstein, Kavanaugh and the accuser on the telephone about this matter. Feinstein flatly refused. It is a stalling technique nothing more and Kavanaugh should sue.
 
They just reported on Fox that Grassley tried to get Feinstein to talk with he, Feinstein, Kavanaugh and the accuser on the telephone about this matter. Feinstein flatly refused. It is a stalling technique nothing more and Kavanaugh should sue.

For what?
 
Her inability to prove it is true does nothing in a civil suit. If she is sued by him all the burden of proof falls to him.
I think that's right. He'd have to prove she's lying. Perhaps he could get by with the Mark Judge testimony + his life-long exemplary reputation. He would then need to prove "damages" which could be construed in a number of ways.

It has became a reality that Democrats will do just about anything, no matter how crazy or stupid, to derail Trump (as they see it). Before this gets even further out of hand (if that's possible), they need to be made to PAY for all this lunacy, they are dragging the country through the mud with.
 
It's way past time that false accusers: Anita Hill, Roy Moore's accusers and now Dr Ford face the consequences of making false and horrible accusations merely to elevate their place in the Progressive Socialist democrat Party.

Should Kavanaugh sue?

You have evidence that her accusations are false?
 
Her inability to prove it is true does nothing in a civil suit. If she is sued by him all the burden of proof falls to him.
I think that's right. He'd have to prove she's lying. Perhaps he could get by with the Mark Judge testimony + his life-long exemplary reputation. He would then need to prove "damages" which could be construed in a number of ways.

It has became a reality that Democrats will do just about anything, no matter how crazy or stupid, to derail Trump (as they see it). Before this gets even further out of hand (if that's possible), they need to be made to PAY for all this lunacy, they are dragging the country through the mud with.
well actually, all he has to do is ask for her evidence. if she doesn't have any, i.e., place and time and a report from the cops, then I think it's obvious what the intentions were. I hope she made a lot of money, he'll get it.
 
Once Kavanaugh is confirmed and sworn in as a Supreme Court Justice, he should publicly forgive his false accuser and wish her well in the future.
I don't see why he should wish her well. A public humiliation like a serious court suit or even jail time might be more suitable. This isn't the kind of thing that should be encouraged.
 
They just reported on Fox that Grassley tried to get Feinstein to talk with he, Feinstein, Kavanaugh and the accuser on the telephone about this matter. Feinstein flatly refused. It is a stalling technique nothing more and Kavanaugh should sue.
I wouldn't want a phone interview either. 90% of communication is nonverbal.
 
They just reported on Fox that Grassley tried to get Feinstein to talk with he, Feinstein, Kavanaugh and the accuser on the telephone about this matter. Feinstein flatly refused. It is a stalling technique nothing more and Kavanaugh should sue.
I wouldn't want a phone interview either. 90% of communication is nonverbal.
fly her in and meet in a room. who cares?
 

Forum List

Back
Top