Can and should Kavanuagh sue Ford Thread and Poll

[BellaRose]

Kavanaugh's accusers have donated to sixty liberal groups and 10 times to Hillary Clinton. No surprise there.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Sure.

Let him sue her.

I’d love the discovery phase.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Sure.

Let him sue her.

I’d love the discovery phase.

Maybe Dr Ford will come up with yet another version of the events and STILL have no one backing her up despite telling her therapist there were 4 boys there

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Wow look at you saying you hate rape victims. Okay, I guess we can end our conversation.

Yep, you're a complete dumbfuck.

 

[Darkwind]

It's way past time that false accusers: Anita Hill, Roy Moore's accusers and now Dr Ford face the consequences of making false and horrible accusations merely to elevate their place in the Progressive Socialist democrat Party.

Should Kavanaugh sue?

Yes he should. In my opinion failure to do so adds to the the doubt of if he did it or not.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Hopefully, Dr Ford has a lenient judge at her sentencing

How would one go about proving she made up the whole story? Even if she cannot prove it to be true, that does not equate to her lying in the eyes of the legal system.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Easy.

You bring people who tesitify to your character and temperment. In this case, there are 65 women who have done that and are as believable, if not more so, than the accuser.

Also, a life that brings credibility to his character and a mountain of evidence of his public work. It all says that this woman who accuses him is doing so for purposes other than the truth.

His character has no bearing on proving that she is lying. Lots of people that were pricks when they were 17 out grow it and become respectable adults.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Except that there is no proof he was like that at all. Even at 17, someone who would do that would have had a reputation and for the most part, people like that do NOT grow out of it. They continue life with a history of being overbearing, rude, or any other kind of personality trait that makes them think they can do whatever they wish.

None of that has ever been evident in his background.

This is a political stunt, motivated to stop a nomination the Democrats know they cannot stop.

 

[Darkwind]

It's way past time that false accusers: Anita Hill, Roy Moore's accusers and now Dr Ford face the consequences of making false and horrible accusations merely to elevate their place in the Progressive Socialist democrat Party.

Should Kavanaugh sue?

Yes he should. In my opinion failure to do so adds to the the doubt of if he did it or not.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Hopefully, Dr Ford has a lenient judge at her sentencing

How would one go about proving she made up the whole story? Even if she cannot prove it to be true, that does not equate to her lying in the eyes of the legal system.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Easy.

You bring people who tesitify to your character and temperment. In this case, there are 65 women who have done that and are as believable, if not more so, than the accuser.

Also, a life that brings credibility to his character and a mountain of evidence of his public work. It all says that this woman who accuses him is doing so for purposes other than the truth.

her story has already changed. how can it be true?

I'm not claiming her story is true. I'm claiming that it would be easy to prove her wrong.

 

[jc456]

Yes he should. In my opinion failure to do so adds to the the doubt of if he did it or not.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Hopefully, Dr Ford has a lenient judge at her sentencing

How would one go about proving she made up the whole story? Even if she cannot prove it to be true, that does not equate to her lying in the eyes of the legal system.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Easy.

You bring people who tesitify to your character and temperment. In this case, there are 65 women who have done that and are as believable, if not more so, than the accuser.

Also, a life that brings credibility to his character and a mountain of evidence of his public work. It all says that this woman who accuses him is doing so for purposes other than the truth.

her story has already changed. how can it be true?

I'm not claiming her story is true. I'm claiming that it would be easy to prove her wrong.

well sure there is, once she settles on which story she wants to tell. Sarcasm.

 

[Pogo]

So you have no answer either.

I'm like frickin' Sandy Koufax out here. Striking everybody out.

Another libtarded self aggrandizer-back patter! Ewe go man!

I have no idea what the fk he's talking about? he ain't got shit. she ain't got shit. it never happened. all she has to do is present a piece of evidence.

He’s like every other libtard on this forum! They are the stupidest things around. Incapable of logic or reason.

I just wiped ewe out with one hand tied behind my back didn't I? Here's your logic: "burden of proof".
Look it up.

Next time plan ahead before stepping into quicksand and then denying the existence of quicksand.

If you are truly using the "burden of proof" to argue your point, then you have to realize that since Ford made this claim, the burden of proof also rests with her.

Now, unless she has a stained dress ala Lewinsky, she has no more proof of the event happening then you claim others here to be using.

So tell me, why do you seem to believe one person who can give no proof, over others that also cannot provide proof?

Mark

I actually have no idea what the story is. Haven't followed it as it registers a zero on the give-a-fuck-o-meter. So I have no idea what her burden of proof is. What I centered on was the absolute stated by, let's see if I get this in order: Grampa Murked U , CrusaderFrank , WillowTree and jc456 , and (Pogo Predicts) in the very next post, that she was "lying" about what is apparently a personal event. I asked the first four of them how they could possibly know the subject is "lying" if they were not present at the time. All four ran away because they knew they were busted.

Four batters up, four strikeouts, no contact. Simple as that. That's what they get for adopting a premise they can't prove exists and then running with it.

Whoops, make it five. Next post.

 

[Darkwind]

Hopefully, Dr Ford has a lenient judge at her sentencing

How would one go about proving she made up the whole story? Even if she cannot prove it to be true, that does not equate to her lying in the eyes of the legal system.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Easy.

You bring people who tesitify to your character and temperment. In this case, there are 65 women who have done that and are as believable, if not more so, than the accuser.

Also, a life that brings credibility to his character and a mountain of evidence of his public work. It all says that this woman who accuses him is doing so for purposes other than the truth.

her story has already changed. how can it be true?

I'm not claiming her story is true. I'm claiming that it would be easy to prove her wrong.

well sure there is, once she settles on which story she wants to tell. Sarcasm.

She can tell a thousand stories for all I care. None of them will be true but one.

The one in which she recants and admits she made it up.

 

[jc456]

How would one go about proving she made up the whole story? Even if she cannot prove it to be true, that does not equate to her lying in the eyes of the legal system.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Easy.

You bring people who tesitify to your character and temperment. In this case, there are 65 women who have done that and are as believable, if not more so, than the accuser.

Also, a life that brings credibility to his character and a mountain of evidence of his public work. It all says that this woman who accuses him is doing so for purposes other than the truth.

her story has already changed. how can it be true?

I'm not claiming her story is true. I'm claiming that it would be easy to prove her wrong.

well sure there is, once she settles on which story she wants to tell. Sarcasm.

She can tell a thousand stories for all I care. None of them will be true but one.

The one in which she recants and admits she made it up.

so she has but two options, go in front of congress to testify on what you have, or if she doesn't agree, then do the vote on Thursday. it seems very open and shut to me.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Yes he should. In my opinion failure to do so adds to the the doubt of if he did it or not.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Hopefully, Dr Ford has a lenient judge at her sentencing

How would one go about proving she made up the whole story? Even if she cannot prove it to be true, that does not equate to her lying in the eyes of the legal system.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Easy.

You bring people who tesitify to your character and temperment. In this case, there are 65 women who have done that and are as believable, if not more so, than the accuser.

Also, a life that brings credibility to his character and a mountain of evidence of his public work. It all says that this woman who accuses him is doing so for purposes other than the truth.

her story has already changed. how can it be true?

I'm not claiming her story is true. I'm claiming that it would be easy to prove her wrong.

Proving her wrong is easier than proving she lied on purpose

 

[Darkwind]

Hopefully, Dr Ford has a lenient judge at her sentencing

How would one go about proving she made up the whole story? Even if she cannot prove it to be true, that does not equate to her lying in the eyes of the legal system.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Easy.

You bring people who tesitify to your character and temperment. In this case, there are 65 women who have done that and are as believable, if not more so, than the accuser.

Also, a life that brings credibility to his character and a mountain of evidence of his public work. It all says that this woman who accuses him is doing so for purposes other than the truth.

her story has already changed. how can it be true?

I'm not claiming her story is true. I'm claiming that it would be easy to prove her wrong.

Proving her wrong is easier than proving she lied on purpose

Not really.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

How would one go about proving she made up the whole story? Even if she cannot prove it to be true, that does not equate to her lying in the eyes of the legal system.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Easy.

You bring people who tesitify to your character and temperment. In this case, there are 65 women who have done that and are as believable, if not more so, than the accuser.

Also, a life that brings credibility to his character and a mountain of evidence of his public work. It all says that this woman who accuses him is doing so for purposes other than the truth.

her story has already changed. how can it be true?

I'm not claiming her story is true. I'm claiming that it would be easy to prove her wrong.

Proving her wrong is easier than proving she lied on purpose

Not really.

Yes, really.

First, you have to prove that it did not happen, which is hard. you can cast doubt on it happening ,but it is near impossible to prove it did not.

Then you would have to prove that she did not experience that event and was just confused about which boy it was that did it.

Damn hard to prove a lie from 30 plus years ago.

 

[boedicca]

Once Kavanaugh is confirmed and sworn in as a Supreme Court Justice, he should publicly forgive his false accuser and wish her well in the future.

I don't see why he should wish her well. A public humiliation like a serious court suit or even jail time might be more suitable. This isn't the kind of thing that should be encouraged.

Kavanaugh is a decent man. He should continue to be one.

Kavanaugh has been a political hack & claim he is a decent man. LOL

Did you fail English as a Second Language?

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Murderers have been convicted by only using circumstantial evidence. In this case, the evidence does point to her being a liar.

Mark

What evidence? The fact that she revealed the claim as far back as 2012?

 

[westwall]

It's way past time that false accusers: Anita Hill, Roy Moore's accusers and now Dr Ford face the consequences of making false and horrible accusations merely to elevate their place in the Progressive Socialist democrat Party.

Should Kavanaugh sue?

Yup. This is clearly a effort on the part of the dnc and feinstein to corrupt the process. It's time to go after ALL of them.

They should be prosecuted for telling the truth? I don't know if Ford's story is going to hold up, but Anita Hill and Roy Moore's accusers went through ridicule and shaming enough for having the NERVE to tell what these famous men did to them. Trump's accusers, too.
Men should not be automatically calling these women liars because they don't like what the political ramifications are. We've got horney pervs on both sides of the aisle. We might as well accept that sometimes it's going to happen.

This thing with Kavanaugh is different, I think, due to their ages at the time and a lot of other things I won't go into here since I already talked about it on another thread.

No, they should be sued for corrupting the process in the name of partisan politics. The claims that the woman is making are crap based on everything that we know of the judge. NO person can recall the two of them EVER BEING in the same house together, much less a room. Her therapists notes mention four boys, not two, and her claim that the therapist made a mistake is silly.

This is a hit job run by the dnc to try and prevent trump from placing his candidate on the bench. It's as simple as that.

 

[Godboy]

A rapist in the White House and another as an SC Justice... how the U.S. has fallen

A rapist in the White House? No, Bill Clinton moved out of there a long time ago.

 

[BlackFlag]

A rapist in the White House and another as an SC Justice... how the U.S. has fallen

A rapist in the White House? No, Bill Clinton moved out of there a long time ago.

Oh so original. I never voted for him. You didn't like having a rapist in then, what's changed your mind? Why do you celebrate the raping of women and children now?

 

[Godboy]

A rapist in the White House and another as an SC Justice... how the U.S. has fallen

A rapist in the White House? No, Bill Clinton moved out of there a long time ago.

Oh so original. I never voted for him. You didn't like having a rapist in then, what's changed your mind? Why do you celebrate the raping of women and children now?

Rapists should not be in the White House. Thats why i voted for Trump. Old Billy almost got back in, but Trump saved the day.

 

[BlackFlag]

A rapist in the White House and another as an SC Justice... how the U.S. has fallen

A rapist in the White House? No, Bill Clinton moved out of there a long time ago.

Oh so original. I never voted for him. You didn't like having a rapist in then, what's changed your mind? Why do you celebrate the raping of women and children now?

Rapists should not be in the White House. Thats why i voted for Trump. Old Billy almost got back in, but Trump saved the day.

Trump was accused by 4 times more women. It's been confirmed he buys prostitutes to cheat on his gold digging wives. You also supported a pedophile for Senate in Alabama, and now a rapist for SCOTUS. You Trump sheep really are pure scum.