Can A Battlefield Commander Incite The Troops To "Fight Like Hell," Or Lose. . . . .

mascale

Gold Member
Feb 22, 2009
6,836
800
130
Medals and Freedom aside, the Articles of Impeachment regarding the Trumped-Up conduct at the Jan 6 Address: Cite the specific language not even disguised. The concept offered was to march and fight, or lose the country--presumably to an enemy. Anyone might compare Lincoln, creating a pre-Gettysburg Address.


Language matters. Even a presidential pardon is a "Grant" from the office-holder, not a right in the job description--regarding activities during the term in office. It is not in the Oath of Office. No such executive orders are mandated in teh Constitution. No place-holder has created a self-pardon in history. No such exemption is presumed in any court.

In the matter of the Jan 6 address, even the whole family seems to have been in on it. Even the family lawyer seems to have been in on it.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Pharaoh's alliance arithmetic, even--Deut 23: 19-20--is not thought to be about foreign aid!)
 
1610463752893.png


Yes. They should all be thrown in prison along with several million more that supported them. Don't forget to ban all those others who aren't thrown in prison from basic services and that they are fired from their places of employment. I'm sure that'll work out well for the incoming team.

*****SMILE*****



:)
 

Attachments

  • 1610463745309.png
    1610463745309.png
    18.7 KB · Views: 21
The timeline has it that some of the people were already marching when the Trumped-Up presidential order was being enunciated. The incitement charge will likely even stick as a criminal charge--and more likely certain to stick in any civil "Wrongful Death" suits brought. Notice any board posters, supportive of the Trumped-Up: Aiding and Abetting the intent to kill Capitol police.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Pharaoh's alliance arithmetic, even--Deut 23: 19-20--is not thought to be about foreign aid!)
 
And all lawful--including the participation in the murder, and the attempts at murder: Of Capitol Police, Trumped-Up incited.

Some may suggest that subsequent a trial--meeting the 2/3 standard for conviction--that removal from office language means that a trial must come to conclusion during the subject term in office.

The more likely application of the standard--on which the Democrats appear to rely--is to federal office-holding: Generally. The language of "High Crimes" is more serious than a traffic violation, even. Amendment 14 likely comes into play, and so the Investigation can likely be a standing House Committee--into a new administration--developing the substance and reach of a major criminal organization or behavior.

No one likely extends a Pardon Protection to a wholesale insurrection, for example--hoping for another one.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Pharaoh's alliance arithmetic, even--Deut 23: 19-20--is not thought to be about foreign aid!)
 

Forum List

Back
Top