Zone1 Calling/accusing other members "groomer"

[AyeCantSeeYou]

Under NO circumstances are forum members allowed to call and/or accuse another member of being a child groomer.

If someone on this forum is suspected of being a groomer or pedophile, DM the mods and tell us why you suspect it and give us the evidence. We will look into it and notify the proper authorities.

This "ruling" applies to member-on-member usage. Posting threads about legit news and events concerning child grooming IS allowed. When posting replies in those threads, keep the personal attacks OUT - absolutely NO accusations towards members of this forum that can be construed as calling them a groomer or pedophile. You can and should question members on their views if you do not agree with them or do not understand them. You are NOT allowed to call them a groomer or imply that they are a groomer.

 

[FJB]

Informative, but I thought that this was already a rule.

 

[Confederate Soldier]

Finally, it was getting old.

 

[fncceo]

Under NO circumstances are forum members allowed to call and/or accuse another member of being a child groomer.

Ahhhh!

 

[Concerned American]

Under NO circumstances are forum members allowed to call and/or accuse another member of being a child groomer.

If someone on this forum is suspected of being a groomer or pedophile, DM the mods and tell us why you suspect it and give us the evidence. We will look into it and notify the proper authorities.

This "ruling" applies to member-on-member usage. Posting threads about legit news and events concerning child grooming IS allowed. When posting replies in those threads, keep the personal attacks OUT - absolutely NO accusations towards members of this forum that can be construed as calling them a groomer or pedophile. You can and should question members on their views if you do not agree with them or do not understand them. You are NOT allowed to call them a groomer or imply that they are a groomer.

I reported to Coyote that playtime was using that word inappropriately in her Sig line after I had been admonished by Coyote to not use it in reference to the Oakland School districts "transition closet" and there has been no change in Playtime's Sig line. Consistency in enforcement would be nice.

 

[Natural Citizen]

So that we're clear, what precisely is a ''child groomer?''

Red font definition preferred, please.

Thanks!

 

[johngaltshrugged]

What about pointing out that some members seem to be groomer enablers or is that not allowed either?
When someone is advocating pro groomer/pedo acts or policy, calling them a groomer enabler is simply stating a fact.

 

[AyeCantSeeYou]

So that we're clear, what precisely is a ''child groomer?''

Red font definition preferred, please.

Thanks!

Grooming is when someone builds a relationship, trust and emotional connection with a child or young person so they can manipulate, exploit and abuse them.

Grooming

Children and young people can be groomed online or in the real world, by a stranger or by someone they know. If you're worried about a child, we have advice to help.

www.nspcc.org.uk

 

[AyeCantSeeYou]

What about pointing out that some members seem to be groomer enablers or is that not allowed either?
When someone is advocating pro groomer/pedo acts or policy, calling them a groomer enabler is simply stating a fact.

Calling someone a "groomer enabler" is the same thing as calling them a groomer. Don't twist it. Don't imply it.

You can question people on their views without accusing.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

But actual pedophiles, groomers, and their allies, I presume, are still just as free as before to continue advocating that shit, right?

It's only us who are opposed to the sexual abuse of children who continue to be censored and suppressed about it?

 

[johngaltshrugged]

Calling someone a "groomer enabler" is the same thing as calling them a groomer. Don't twist it. Don't imply it.

You can question people on their views without accusing.

View attachment 753952

No it is not.
An enabler is not the same as someone who perpetrates the crime.
Words have meaning. Don't twist them or imply they don't.

For instance, if I said a post sounds like something a groomer enabler would say, it is not the same as calling the poster a groomer.
As a matter of fact, that isn't even an accusation, it is stating an opinion.
Is an opinion now banned?

 

[Moonglow]

No it is not.
An enabler is not the same as someone who perpetrates the crime.
Words have meaning. Don't twist them or imply they don't.

For instance, if I said a post sounds like something a groomer enabler would say, it is not the same as calling the poster a groomer.
As a matter of fact, that isn't even an accusation, it is stating an opinion.
Is an opinion now banned?

I am afraid it is saying that it sounds like something a groomer would be accusing them of grooming.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

We're probably getting close to the point where merely pointing out the obvious fact that the intent and effect of this policy is to protect pedophiles, will be deemed a violation of this policy.

 

[Moonglow]

We're probably getting close to the point where merely pointing out the obvious fact that the intent and effect of this policy is to protect pedophiles, will be deemed a violation of this policy.

Hardly since there has already been an instance of the expulsion of such a character long ago before the word groomer became a household slur.

 

[FJB]

We're probably getting close to the point where merely pointing out the obvious fact that the intent and effect of this policy is to protect pedophiles, will be deemed a violation of this policy.

You said it not me,.. I was just thinking that. I like AyeCantSeeYou a whole lot, but this policy is crap in my opinion.

 

[Moonglow]

You said it not me,.. I was just thinking that. I like AyeCantSeeYou a whole lot, but this policy is crap in my opinion.

So is blindly accusing posters because of political fights.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

What word do you want people to use to describe the act of providing gay pornography to young children?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

You said it not me,.. I was just thinking that. I like AyeCantSeeYou a whole lot, but this policy is crap in my opinion.

It formalizes what we've known all along, that this site has a policy of willfully protecting child abusers and their allies.

 

[FJB]

What word do you want people to use to describe the act of providing gay pornography to young children?

Nothing. They care way more about protecting pedos than protecting children just like the rest of the woke world today.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

It formalizes what we've known all along, that this site has a policy of willfully protecting child abusers and their allies.

and is a complete slap in the face to posters who have been impacted by child abuse.