California's $2.2 billion solar plant is shutting down.

[Litwin]

so called "Green" energy works only in the heads of our pink unicorns. An electrical engineer friend of mine told me years ago that solar is a total disaster as far as being an economic and ecological form of energy. To top it off, it’s way more expensive than people think. But it’s great for the commie han-Chinese slavers , who make all the panels. Anyone who argues against nuclear energy is not to be taken serious. It’s the most obvious solution to the worlds power needs and is by far the most environmentally friendly.

context :

Thread 'Have U.S. greenies finally returned to reality? As data centers gobble up electricity, Big Tech is going all-in on nuclear power.'

Oct 1, 2025

$350B for US nuclear underscores the AI-era reality: we need clean, 24/7 firm power. The question is no longer if, but how fast. Priorities: extend the current fleet, deploy SMRs near load centers, streamline permitting, and secure fuel.
Still, have U.S. greenies finally returned to reality, or are they still working—consciously or unconsciously—for Moscow imperialism ?

When the KGB Weaponized ‘Peace’: A Q&A with Dietmar Pichler — Bette Dangerous Podcast Ep91

Disinformation analyst and Disinfo Resilience Network founder Dietmar Pichler explains the KGB origins and infiltration of the peace movement, and how for Russia ‘peace’ is an anti-Western operation

www.bettedangerous.com

As data centers gobble up electricity, Big Tech goes all-in on nuclear power

After decades of being on the back burner of energy policy, investments in nuclear power are on the rise, spurred on by electricity demands from big tech and changing federal policy.

www.marketplace.org

"

Environment...​

• Litwin

• 

 

[Manonthestreet]

Not to mention they are toxic waste......great plan

 

[Litwin]

Not to mention they are toxic waste......great plan

How did the so‑called greens (radical left) 30 years ago plan to run an industrial, big country on solar panels 24/7? Because we cannot do it today, even with all our new digital capabilities. What was the plan? How was it supposed to work?

 

[ColonelAngus]

But but but!

Nuclear energy makes lefties skeered.

We are going into the AI generation using butterfly farts to power data centers.

 

[Litwin]

Nuclear energy makes lefties skeered.

are you sure ?

context :

Pro-Putin NGO Pushed Green New Deal, Protested Keystone XL Pipeline

weber.house.gov

The Stasi and the Greens

A new study documents how the secret police in Communist East Germany tried to influence the Green Party in West Germany. Bad news for the Greens? Not at all. They're the ones who commissioned the study.

www.dw.com

 

[Nostra]

It’s always been a scam.

 

[The Duke]

so called "Green" energy works only in the heads of our pink unicorns. An electrical engineer friend of mine told me years ago that solar is a total disaster as far as being an economic and ecological form of energy. To top it off, it’s way more expensive than people think. But it’s great for the commie han-Chinese slavers , who make all the panels. Anyone who argues against nuclear energy is not to be taken serious. It’s the most obvious solution to the worlds power needs and is by far the most environmentally friendly.

View attachment 1250045


context :

Thread 'Have U.S. greenies finally returned to reality? As data centers gobble up electricity, Big Tech is going all-in on nuclear power.'

Oct 1, 2025

$350B for US nuclear underscores the AI-era reality: we need clean, 24/7 firm power. The question is no longer if, but how fast. Priorities: extend the current fleet, deploy SMRs near load centers, streamline permitting, and secure fuel.
Still, have U.S. greenies finally returned to reality, or are they still working—consciously or unconsciously—for Moscow imperialism ?

When the KGB Weaponized ‘Peace’: A Q&A with Dietmar Pichler — Bette Dangerous Podcast Ep91

Disinformation analyst and Disinfo Resilience Network founder Dietmar Pichler explains the KGB origins and infiltration of the peace movement, and how for Russia ‘peace’ is an anti-Western operation

www.bettedangerous.com

As data centers gobble up electricity, Big Tech goes all-in on nuclear power

After decades of being on the back burner of energy policy, investments in nuclear power are on the rise, spurred on by electricity demands from big tech and changing federal policy.

www.marketplace.org

"

Environment...​

• Litwin

• 

Small, modular nuclear is the way to go.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

How did the so‑called greens (radical left) 30 years ago plan to run an industrial, big country on solar panels 24/7? Because we cannot do it today, even with all our new digital capabilities. What was the plan? How was it supposed to work?

It was never intended to work. The sole purpose has always been to degrade our way of life so the poverty and socialism could follow.

 

[ColonelAngus]

It was never intended to work. The sole purpose has always been to degrade our way of life so the poverty and socialism could follow.

Effing NAILED IT.

A grift to steal money as well.

 

[Litwin]

Small, modular nuclear is the way to go.

We need small, medium and large modular nuclear reactors. Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) if you need faster, lower‑risk deployment, modular scaling, and siting flexibility; choose large reactors if you need lowest long‑run unit cost at very large scale and can tolerate long lead times and huge upfront capital.

 

[Litwin]

It was never intended to work. The sole purpose has always been to degrade our way of life so the poverty and socialism could follow.

So Bolshevik and putin’s empires have been behind this mess all those years?

context :

Pro-Putin NGO Pushed Green New Deal, Protested Keystone XL Pipeline

weber.house.gov

The Stasi and the Greens

A new study documents how the secret police in Communist East Germany tried to influence the Green Party in West Germany. Bad news for the Greens? Not at all. They're the ones who commissioned the study.

www.dw.com

 

[Litwin]

It was never intended to work. The sole purpose has always been to degrade our way of life so the poverty and socialism could follow.

Effing NAILED IT.

A grift to steal money as well.

What do U.S. greenies want today, and how do they plan to fuel the AI revolution?

Solar panels and wind turbines can NOT produce a stable energy flow—even WE multiply them 10 or 100 times, Solar and wind turbines still won’t power our cities and industries 24/7. Solar and wind turbines ALSO failed miserably in Germany. So called "green energy" works only for tsar putin and his predatory empire.

 

[Litwin]

Small, modular nuclear is the way to go.

ps Without French nuclear power, Europe would be in a complete blackout.All of Europe, from Lisbon to Riga.

 

[Litwin]

FINALLY : Belgium is making a strong comeback in nuclear power: the government will buy back the 7 reactors from the French company Engie and immediately suspend their decommissioning
Anti-nuclear " environmentalists" have caused our countries to lose decades and have generated considerable pollution (coal, gas...). Shame on these reckless ideologues AND TRAITORS

 

[Litwin]

 

[marvin martian]

How did the so‑called greens (radical left) 30 years ago plan to run an industrial, big country on solar panels 24/7? Because we cannot do it today, even with all our new digital capabilities. What was the plan? How was it supposed to work?

It was never supposed to work.

It's a money laundering scheme.

 

[JohnDB]

Nuclear power is not as "clean" or as simple as we think.
Yes, zero "greenhouse" gasses....
Yes. Lots of juice generated.

However....
When mining for uranium we get vanadium (used in tool steel). But there's a reason it's not popular anymore.

Vanadium and uranium deposits are in ground absolutely full of Radon gas.

Radon gas is silent, odorless, and extremely sneaky. It will cause all sorts of immune disorders and especially lung cancer after exposure.

Most people are exposed at some point but due to limited exposure no harmful effects are registered.
Uranium miners are not as fortunate. They are exposed to large amounts on a daily basis as are the towns and valleys the mines reside in. At this point the miners know....usually they have zero other options than the uranium mines for work knowing it's a death sentence when they sign up to work at them.
Mine ownership is half a planet away.

Reprocessing spent uranium fuel rods is more expensive than fresh ones. So nobody does it. Zero market for them unless Reprocessing technology gets better and cheaper. ($$$$)

Just saying that this is not a perfect solution that people claim.

 

[CowboyTed]

so called "Green" energy works only in the heads of our pink unicorns. An electrical engineer friend of mine told me years ago that solar is a total disaster as far as being an economic and ecological form of energy. To top it off, it’s way more expensive than people think. But it’s great for the commie han-Chinese slavers , who make all the panels. Anyone who argues against nuclear energy is not to be taken serious. It’s the most obvious solution to the worlds power needs and is by far the most environmentally friendly.

View attachment 1250045


context :

Thread 'Have U.S. greenies finally returned to reality? As data centers gobble up electricity, Big Tech is going all-in on nuclear power.'

Oct 1, 2025

$350B for US nuclear underscores the AI-era reality: we need clean, 24/7 firm power. The question is no longer if, but how fast. Priorities: extend the current fleet, deploy SMRs near load centers, streamline permitting, and secure fuel.
Still, have U.S. greenies finally returned to reality, or are they still working—consciously or unconsciously—for Moscow imperialism ?

When the KGB Weaponized ‘Peace’: A Q&A with Dietmar Pichler — Bette Dangerous Podcast Ep91

Disinformation analyst and Disinfo Resilience Network founder Dietmar Pichler explains the KGB origins and infiltration of the peace movement, and how for Russia ‘peace’ is an anti-Western operation

www.bettedangerous.com

As data centers gobble up electricity, Big Tech goes all-in on nuclear power

After decades of being on the back burner of energy policy, investments in nuclear power are on the rise, spurred on by electricity demands from big tech and changing federal policy.

www.marketplace.org

"

Environment...​

• Litwin

• 

Solar is very cost effective...

Wind is even better...

Nuclear is getting far better than the old plant but there is a lot of hidden costs and it is not as guarantee as people think... Look at France (massive into Nuclear), they have problems in the summers due to more Air Con use but the rivers go down and Nuclear needs a lot of water to cool.

I am not saying no to Nuclear, any good system is going to have a mix. Europe is going down the Wind with Gas or Nuclear as back up... Wind is the best of cheap electricity, nothing beats it... mixing it with another source gives the real win..

 

[JohnDB]

Solar is very cost effective...

Wind is even better...

Nuclear is getting far better than the old plant but there is a lot of hidden costs and it is not as guarantee as people think... Look at France (massive into Nuclear), they have problems in the summers due to more Air Con use but the rivers go down and Nuclear needs a lot of water to cool.

I am not saying no to Nuclear, any good system is going to have a mix. Europe is going down the Wind with Gas or Nuclear as back up... Wind is the best of cheap electricity, nothing beats it... mixing it with another source gives the real win..

France?
Uh.....they are in a LOT of trouble economically lately....including power generation. Eiffel Tower is going dark because they need the power elsewhere.

 

[CowboyTed]

Nuclear power is not as "clean" or as simple as we think.
Yes, zero "greenhouse" gasses....
Yes. Lots of juice generated.

However....
When mining for uranium we get vanadium (used in tool steel). But there's a reason it's not popular anymore.

Vanadium and uranium deposits are in ground absolutely full of Radon gas.

Radon gas is silent, odorless, and extremely sneaky. It will cause all sorts of immune disorders and especially lung cancer after exposure.

Most people are exposed at some point but due to limited exposure no harmful effects are registered.
Uranium miners are not as fortunate. They are exposed to large amounts on a daily basis as are the towns and valleys the mines reside in. At this point the miners know....usually they have zero other options than the uranium mines for work knowing it's a death sentence when they sign up to work at them.
Mine ownership is half a planet away.

Reprocessing spent uranium fuel rods is more expensive than fresh ones. So nobody does it. Zero market for them unless Reprocessing technology gets better and cheaper. ($$$$)

Just saying that this is not a perfect solution that people claim.

The main reason for reprocessing is that in Europe it is way cheaper than disposal...