California accepts mail in ballots up to 7 DAYS after election day!

[Fort Fun Indiana]

A fair and legitimate way to do mail-in ballots and ensure that the election counts are done in a timely manner:

• All mail-in ballots must be mailed to citizens at least 4 weeks before any election day.
• All mail-in ballots must be received no later than two weeks prior to the election. That is often a 2- to 3-week window to decide how a person wants to vote.
• All mail-in votes will be fully counted no later than one week prior to the election.
• The count results WILL be sealed and given into the custody of a disinterested third party, such as the US Marshals office.

On the Day the polls open, the mail-in ballot results will be added to the official vote count for that election.
The only counting needed are the live election results at the time the polls close.

Everyone gets to vote. If someone thinks their mail-in ballot was not counted, they can cast a provisional ballot on Election Day to be flagged and counted after the polls close.

No mail-in ballot will be counted AFTER the deadline of two weeks prior to the election.

Or just keep doing what we do, since there is exactly zero evidence of any significant mail ballot fraud, nor should any deference be paid to the neuroses and fetishes of sore loser liars.

 

[JGalt]

Or just keep doing what we do, since there is exactly zero evidence of any significant mail ballot fraud, nor should any deference be paid to the neuroses and fetishes of sore loser liars.

There's also zero evidence that I have a flat tire or a fire in my garage, but I still have a spare and a fire extinguisher.

If there's "exactly zero evidence of any significant mail ballot fraud", then you won't squeal like a little piggie when we institute some extra security measures for our elections, right?

 

[marvin martian]

How are they preventing people from copying ballots and then printing hundreds of ballots?

Preventing?

The DemoKKKrats are paying people to do that.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Left’s Election Fraud Denials Crumble as DOJ Exposes Two-Decade-Long California Cheating Scheme

Despite evidence to the contrary, liberal voting activists have spent years minimizing cheating concerns and portraying those who want to investigate such problems as “election deniers.” But the F…

constitutionstudy.com

Despite evidence to the contrary, liberal voting activists have spent years minimizing cheating concerns and portraying those who want to investigate such problems as “election deniers.”
But the FBI and the departments of Justice and Homeland Security are now systematically exposing electoral fraud – from non-citizen voting to ballot-box-stuffing schemes that are turning the table in epic fashion.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

There's also zero evidence that I have a flat tire or a fire in my garage, but I still have a spare and a fire extinguisher.

Which doesnt risk disenfranchising voters over a nonexistent problem. So, irrelevant.

Next

 

[candycorn]

Who cares. It isn't an impediment to enacting the outline as I presented it, as law.

So you want to require people to vote prior to hearing the debate. Thats retarded.

That is an outright lie. I've always question the way in which the parties have too much control over how, when, and who, gets to count ballots on election days.

Yeah sure...lets see your 300+ posts about fraud concerning Trump's victory in 2024.

Awww. You has a sadz....

Your surrender is accepted.

 

[excalibur]

Democrtas have turned Election Day into Election Months.

Early voting in May, then the day itself in June, then the vote finalized on July 10. Parts of three months.