But Some Stupid Assholes Still Believe in "Overpopulation"...

....

The problem is the global population is booming among those who cannot support themselves. .....

Where?

India. Africa. South America.




 
....

The problem is the global population is booming among those who cannot support themselves. .....

Where?

India. Africa. South America.





In that case, why whine?
 
....

The problem is the global population is booming among those who cannot support themselves. .....

Where?

India. Africa. South America.





In that case, why whine?

"Whine"?
 
....

The problem is the global population is booming among those who cannot support themselves. .....

Where?

India. Africa. South America.





In that case, why whine?
Nobody is whining....The overall point is that the Malthusian declinists of today are as wrong as they were two centuries ago.
 
We aren't staring at extinction. There are way more people then the world can adequately support. This might be nature's way of saying cool it






This is patently untrue. At current tech level the planet can support 12 billion. With simple tech, and control of wasted food (almost 50% of what is produced) then it jumps to 15 to 20 billion.

With more advanced tech it is theorized the carrying capacity jumps to 40 billion.

There simply is no overpopulation problem. It is a myth.
 

Fertility rates are plummeting all over the world, demographic projections show a global population implosion looming, we may be staring down the barrel of extinction, but some fucking idiots cannot let go of a false crisis they were fed as children.
There are less intelligent people----more 3rd world who have been overbreeding using welfare and government donations----putting a strain on the planet, polluting the planet, and ruining animals habitats.






Even those numbers are plummeting.
 
It's said that agenda21 is all about reducing world population. That's the actual base of the agenda.
Biden, of course, is a loyal Agenda21 puppet.

Now let's see...Bill gates....a HUGE proponent of Agenda21 has recently become the largest owner of farmland in America.
Can you solve this equation.....2 + 2 = ???

GMO and God knows what they're doing to the food chain. But Bill Gates is mighty interested in it all.

Do the math if you can.

It has been estimated that if the mental illness called 'narcissism' could be eradicated in it's entirety that upwards to 60% of humanities problems would just fade away. Unfortunately narcissism is on the rise big time. Individuals like Bill Gates attract narcissism like government attracts taxes.




 
We aren't staring at extinction. There are way more people then the world can adequately support. This might be nature's way of saying cool it
That's not true at all, actually. If you look at modern crop yields and how arable land is currently being used, the world could actually feed way more people than we currently have.

The main reason for world hunger is a matter of food spoiling during distribution. Certain parts of the world have more arable land than others, and the ratio of that land to population is not uniform. It's why China has to import a lot of its food, while America has a vast surplus of it.

If every nation with significant arable land used most of that land for farming, we could feed way more humans, assuming we have the means to properly distribute food without it spoiling first.

That being said, there are questions of what the quality of life becomes past a certain world population number. We don't seem to be anywhere near a major limit, however.
 
We aren't staring at extinction. There are way more people then the world can adequately support. This might be nature's way of saying cool it
That's not true at all, actually. If you look at modern crop yields and how arable land is currently being used, the world could actually feed way more people than we currently have.

The main reason for world hunger is a matter of food spoiling during distribution. Certain parts of the world have more arable land than others, and the ratio of that land to population is not uniform. It's why China has to import a lot of its food, while America has a vast surplus of it.

If every nation with significant arable land used most of that land for farming, we could feed way more humans, assuming we have the means to properly distribute food without it spoiling first.

That being said, there are questions of what the quality of life becomes past a certain world population number. We don't seem to be anywhere near a major limit, however.






Every person on the planet can fit into an area the size of Rhode Island. There is plenty of space for humanity.
 
When there is a situation involving over population, 'nature' always "takes care" of it. This will happen in the human population as well if we don't do it ourselves intelligently. In other words, 'nature' will probably do it.
 
When there is a situation involving over population, 'nature' always "takes care" of it. This will happen in the human population as well if we don't do it ourselves intelligently. In other words, 'nature' will probably do it.
Did you read the OP?
 
1614433835039.png

~S~
 
We aren't staring at extinction. There are way more people then the world can adequately support. This might be nature's way of saying cool it
That's not true at all, actually. If you look at modern crop yields and how arable land is currently being used, the world could actually feed way more people than we currently have.

The main reason for world hunger is a matter of food spoiling during distribution. Certain parts of the world have more arable land than others, and the ratio of that land to population is not uniform. It's why China has to import a lot of its food, while America has a vast surplus of it.

If every nation with significant arable land used most of that land for farming, we could feed way more humans, assuming we have the means to properly distribute food without it spoiling first.

That being said, there are questions of what the quality of life becomes past a certain world population number. We don't seem to be anywhere near a major limit, however.






Every person on the planet can fit into an area the size of Rhode Island. There is plenty of space for humanity.
space islezs of an issue than resources. This is, after all, a planet shared by multiple species right?
 
We aren't staring at extinction. There are way more people then the world can adequately support. This might be nature's way of saying cool it
That's not true at all, actually. If you look at modern crop yields and how arable land is currently being used, the world could actually feed way more people than we currently have.

The main reason for world hunger is a matter of food spoiling during distribution. Certain parts of the world have more arable land than others, and the ratio of that land to population is not uniform. It's why China has to import a lot of its food, while America has a vast surplus of it.

If every nation with significant arable land used most of that land for farming, we could feed way more humans, assuming we have the means to properly distribute food without it spoiling first.

That being said, there are questions of what the quality of life becomes past a certain world population number. We don't seem to be anywhere near a major limit, however.






Every person on the planet can fit into an area the size of Rhode Island. There is plenty of space for humanity.
space islezs of an issue than resources. This is, after all, a planet shared by multiple species right?







Like I said earlier, the resources are there, the mismanagement of those resources is the issue.
 
We aren't staring at extinction. There are way more people then the world can adequately support. This might be nature's way of saying cool it

The problem is the global population is booming among those who cannot support themselves. That's why they are intruding into regions that are self-supportive.

If it continues, no society will be able to support itself, and civilization will fall.

Someone could explain this to Joe, but it wouldn't matter, since he is in charge of nothing. The path has been set.
Joe should read "The Bell Curve". It might clarify things.
 

Fertility rates are plummeting all over the world, demographic projections show a global population implosion looming, we may be staring down the barrel of extinction, but some fucking idiots cannot let go of a false crisis they were fed as children.
There are less intelligent people----more 3rd world who have been overbreeding using welfare and government donations----putting a strain on the planet, polluting the planet, and ruining animals habitats.
Well said,amen to that
 

Forum List

Back
Top