Burning prisoners to death, a punishment sanctioned in Islam

it is called inshallah

which makes it acceptable to burn people alive

That's not even vaguely remotely close to what insha'Allah means.
As I said -- bullshit thread. Summa y'all just trot out your ignorance like it's some kind of badge of honour. That's just weird.


fuck you

inshallah means allah willing

even if it is evil in nature

Inshallah - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

Yes, that's what it means. Which says as much about "burning" as a recipe for angel food cake says about the rings of fucking Saturn.

So no --- fuck YOU.

you are one dense chick

it refers to "anything" as in "God willing" or "if Allah wills"

as in maktub (that everything is written)

NONE of which refers in any way to "burning" anything.

Are ya fucking dense???

:banghead:

speaking of dense

you are a fucking moron lady

look up Qisas (equality in punishment) sometime

in this case a Muslim causing death to another Muslim







 
That's not even vaguely remotely close to what insha'Allah means.
As I said -- bullshit thread. Summa y'all just trot out your ignorance like it's some kind of badge of honour. That's just weird.


fuck you

inshallah means allah willing

even if it is evil in nature

Inshallah - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

Yes, that's what it means. Which says as much about "burning" as a recipe for angel food cake says about the rings of fucking Saturn.

So no --- fuck YOU.

you are one dense chick

it refers to "anything" as in "God willing" or "if Allah wills"

as in maktub (that everything is written)

NONE of which refers in any way to "burning" anything.

Are ya fucking dense???

:banghead:

speaking of dense

you are a fucking moron lady

look up Qisas (equality in punishment) sometime

in this case a Muslim causing death to another Muslim

"Lady"? Who the fuck are you talking to?

This stream is not about Qisas. It's about insha'Allah. Which you've been insisting has something to do with fire.

Well it doesn't. It means exactly the same thing we mean when we say, "God willing". You're completely full of shit.
 
fuck you

inshallah means allah willing

even if it is evil in nature

Inshallah - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

Yes, that's what it means. Which says as much about "burning" as a recipe for angel food cake says about the rings of fucking Saturn.

So no --- fuck YOU.

you are one dense chick

it refers to "anything" as in "God willing" or "if Allah wills"

as in maktub (that everything is written)

NONE of which refers in any way to "burning" anything.

Are ya fucking dense???

:banghead:

speaking of dense

you are a fucking moron lady

look up Qisas (equality in punishment) sometime

in this case a Muslim causing death to another Muslim

"Lady"? Who the fuck are you talking to?

This stream is not about Qisas. It's about insha'Allah. Which you've been insisting has something to do with fire.

Well it doesn't. It means exactly the same thing we mean when we say, "God willing". You're completely full of shit.


to you

it is all related ass hole

it is quite clear that

a Muslim can burn another Muslim alive

for the crime of murder

as long as blood money was not accepted
 
Uh....nnnnnnnnnnnnnnno. Insha'Allah has nothing in the world to do with murder, blood money, burning anything, recipes for angel food cake using ras al hanout, the tire pressure on a '51 Fiat or the point spread of the last Bengals-Raiders game. Try reading your own link.

You're officially fried, man. :cuckoo:

I mean... crispy.

:dig:
 
ICU neglected to look up Qisas (equality in punishment)

which was what the thread was about

according to the link

and the verse quoted by isil

as their justification to commit such hideous act

against another Muslim

 
I can't watch this any more....

Fried.
pancake.gif
 
Back when Christians burned folks at the stake, occasionally they would take mercy on the condemned and hang a bag of gunpowder around the neck.

Most of the people accused of witchcraft in 1692 Salem Massachusetts were hanged. One was placed under a plank and stones were added atop said plank until the victim was crushed. These were executions carried out in America and part of our history.

all true-----but now it is a crime. One of the arguments
often presented regarding Islamic barbarity is----"think of
muslims are being 600 years behind Christians in
civilization"
Because I have interacted with muslims in the USA for
a very long time (more than 45 years)---I assure I do
know that muslims do not consider themselves "less
civilized" than anyone on earth----in fact FAR AHEAD.
The subjects of their weekly Khutbah Jumaat feces
fling "sermons" in mosques generally consist of
assertions that islam is THE MOST CIVILIZED and
ADVANCED religion the world has every known----
and actually muhummad INVENTED such concepts
as "women's rights" and "ending slavery" etc etc.
Poor King Abdullah----was so stuck ----he clearly felt
compelled to say "that was not islam...." ------but then
his mother was an English lady... he may not know

Oh goodie. More Rosie stories :)

oh goodie ----more vulgarity from the desperate islamo Nazi sow-----coyote
 
Back when Christians burned folks at the stake, occasionally they would take mercy on the condemned and hang a bag of gunpowder around the neck.

Most of the people accused of witchcraft in 1692 Salem Massachusetts were hanged. One was placed under a plank and stones were added atop said plank until the victim was crushed. These were executions carried out in America and part of our history.

all true-----but now it is a crime. One of the arguments
often presented regarding Islamic barbarity is----"think of
muslims are being 600 years behind Christians in
civilization"
Because I have interacted with muslims in the USA for
a very long time (more than 45 years)---I assure I do
know that muslims do not consider themselves "less
civilized" than anyone on earth----in fact FAR AHEAD.
The subjects of their weekly Khutbah Jumaat feces
fling "sermons" in mosques generally consist of
assertions that islam is THE MOST CIVILIZED and
ADVANCED religion the world has every known----
and actually muhummad INVENTED such concepts
as "women's rights" and "ending slavery" etc etc.
Poor King Abdullah----was so stuck ----he clearly felt
compelled to say "that was not islam...." ------but then
his mother was an English lady... he may not know

Oh goodie. More Rosie stories :)

oh goodie ----more vulgarity from the desperate islamo Nazi sow-----coyote
Chaim yankel, heng dikh oyf a tsikershtrikl vestru hobn a zisn toyt,
 
What a sick, perverted, barbaric religion Islam is:

Outrage in Mideast over IS killing of Jordan pilot - Yahoo News

Of course, to make a stupid point, the OP has to totally ignore the condemnation of these bastards but the vast majority of Muslims and leaders of Muslim majority countries.
The OP is also a sick fuck, using these idiot hate groups as a reason to hate all Muslims, even the poor dude these ***** burnt to death.

Of course you totally ignore the fact that they played the video of the burning pilot in front of a cheering crowd in Qabba with Muslim children enjoying it as well, and that thousands of Muslims are flocking to ISIS, which holds huge swaths of land.

You guys just hate it when someone tells the truth about Islam. Suddenly now, all these Islamic terrorist groups have become "hate groups"? Ha ha ha.


They hate us no doubt.

Jordan bombed the shit out if Isis in Syria last night.


Dicks of his type try to paint the extremists as the whole of Islam, totally ignoring the pilot was a Muslim, and Jordan's Muslims want ISIS destroyed.

Basically, he's a sick fucker.
 
You naive, strange people who are continuously racking your small brains. looking for moral equivalence of reprehensible Islamic actions, are beyond normal comprehension.

All you are doing is trying to change the subject thereby helping these foul radical savages!

There is no logic whatsoever in your actions.

Instead of looking for excuses for this monstrous burning, why not concentrate on the present, which is the danger of radical Islam as has been proved without a doubt time and time again.


Stop making excuses by attempting to compare actions that are beyond any rational comparison.

Have the courage, decency and common sense to aknowledge these Islamic horrors for what they are instead of always being a willing donkey for radical Islam!

All you are demonstrating is that you seem to have hidden sympathy for all these horrible actions!

Shame on you!

Shame on you?

Shame on you.

Religious extremism sucks. Those that don't recognize it cry "moral equivalency".

African Christians are burning witches and excorsizing kids with acid. Sweet.


Your answer is completely without logic and once again you are descending to moral equivalence, which means you are attempting to change the subject and gloss over its seriousness

Even if your babble about African witches is true ...what possible comparison is there to the Islamic Caliphate State whose religious aim is to dominate the whole world under Sharia Law and maintain its barbaric practices.

Your babble is completly irrelevant!

People who use this moral equivalence garbage, seem to be condoning the actions of radical Islam by saying - "Well so what , a lot of others are doing it, so why shouldn't they?" -

Everybody who makes these disgusting , ignorant comparisons is only helping the enemy by being a useful donkey for radical Islam.

You can be sure that the enemy is fully aware of these "moral equivalence" comments and is greatly encouraged by them.

They are no doubt amazed by all the sympathy they get from the enemy, in other words the enemy is in the necessary state of submission like so many in this thread.


sky----the word "ENEMY" is relative ----relative to the person being considered. Al Qaeda may be YOUR enemy----but it
is not the enemy of coyote----nor is "isis" Placing a young pilot in a cage and setting him on fire may seem
like an atrocity and a crime to YOU-----but it is not so for coyote RELATIVE to WHO is doing the 'setting on fire'
and to what end. Your problem, sky----is that you do not
enjoy obscene sophistry

Speak for yourself you obscene creature. You only care if atrocities are committed by Muslims. Anyone else, well...it's just an aberration according to you and Skye - or perhaps it just doesn't count if it's not Muslim.
What you're hoping to side-step is that the burning alive of the Jordanian pilot brought into focus the continuing threat of islamo-fascism and its appeals to a resurgence of islamo-conquest and the islamo-caliphate proposed by ISIS.

You need to keep this latest incident of islamo-barbarism in context with the on-going islamo-atrocities taking place across the globe. The reality is that the thugs, misogynists and murderers that many converts and pom pom flailers find excuses for, live and thrive off of the infliction of death, destruction and suffering. They find a holy mandate for murder. They are, after all, following in the footsteps of the islamo-model for all humanity: muhammud (swish). "The way of the prophet" is what drives the swath of death and destruction across Iraq and Syria. ISIS sees Muhammud's (swish) design in destruction, suffering in pursuit of a caliphate.
 
I have yet to see this video.

I haven't seen it either but I have no need to.
I've seen ones of witch-burnings in Africa and read way more than enough about Inquisitions, plus all that history I linked yesterday as well as the one at the beginning of this thread. It doesn't get any easier.
I don't care about history. I need to see what they claimed happened did.

Then you must be an athiest like me because I say the same things when religions claim god came and visited their ancient ancestors.
 
You naive, strange people who are continuously racking your small brains. looking for moral equivalence of reprehensible Islamic actions, are beyond normal comprehension.

All you are doing is trying to change the subject thereby helping these foul radical savages!

There is no logic whatsoever in your actions.

Instead of looking for excuses for this monstrous burning, why not concentrate on the present, which is the danger of radical Islam as has been proved without a doubt time and time again.


Stop making excuses by attempting to compare actions that are beyond any rational comparison.

Have the courage, decency and common sense to aknowledge these Islamic horrors for what they are instead of always being a willing donkey for radical Islam!

All you are demonstrating is that you seem to have hidden sympathy for all these horrible actions!

Shame on you!

Shame on you?

Shame on you.

Religious extremism sucks. Those that don't recognize it cry "moral equivalency".

African Christians are burning witches and excorsizing kids with acid. Sweet.


Your answer is completely without logic and once again you are descending to moral equivalence, which means you are attempting to change the subject and gloss over its seriousness

Even if your babble about African witches is true ...what possible comparison is there to the Islamic Caliphate State whose religious aim is to dominate the whole world under Sharia Law and maintain its barbaric practices.

Your babble is completly irrelevant!

People who use this moral equivalence garbage, seem to be condoning the actions of radical Islam by saying - "Well so what , a lot of others are doing it, so why shouldn't they?" -

Everybody who makes these disgusting , ignorant comparisons is only helping the enemy by being a useful donkey for radical Islam.

You can be sure that the enemy is fully aware of these "moral equivalence" comments and is greatly encouraged by them.

They are no doubt amazed by all the sympathy they get from the enemy, in other words the enemy is in the necessary state of submission like so many in this thread.


sky----the word "ENEMY" is relative ----relative to the person being considered. Al Qaeda may be YOUR enemy----but it
is not the enemy of coyote----nor is "isis" Placing a young pilot in a cage and setting him on fire may seem
like an atrocity and a crime to YOU-----but it is not so for coyote RELATIVE to WHO is doing the 'setting on fire'
and to what end. Your problem, sky----is that you do not
enjoy obscene sophistry

Speak for yourself you obscene creature. You only care if atrocities are committed by Muslims. Anyone else, well...it's just an aberration according to you and Skye - or perhaps it just doesn't count if it's not Muslim.
What you're hoping to side-step is that the burning alive of the Jordanian pilot brought into focus the continuing threat of islamo-fascism and its appeals to a resurgence of islamo-conquest and the islamo-caliphate proposed by ISIS.

You need to keep this latest incident of islamo-barbarism in context with the on-going islamo-atrocities taking place across the globe. The reality is that the thugs, misogynists and murderers that many converts and pom pom flailers find excuses for, live and thrive off of the infliction of death, destruction and suffering. They find a holy mandate for murder. They are, after all, following in the footsteps of the islamo-model for all humanity: muhammud (swish). "The way of the prophet" is what drives the swath of death and destruction across Iraq and Syria. ISIS sees Muhammud's (swish) design in destruction, suffering in pursuit of a caliphate.


the video served a couple of purposes

a recruitment tool

and

as a warning to other Muslims willing to fight

against isil
 
So having a glass of wine with my girlfriend is an abomination in Islam but burning someone alive is good to go? is that what I'm hearing?

The Jesuits consider Protestants being permitted to remain free to preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ to be an abomination and yet burning the Protestants alive is good to go for them. They still have the same exact doctrines to this very day - preparing for Inquisition Part two - if you are going to be concerned about something you should be in great concern for the Jesuits working for the Pope to accomplish a One World Order - a One World Faith - in order to dominate the world because the Vatican has trillions of dollars and the Islamists are merely the pawns in their game. They have always played both sides going all the way back to the beginning. Always. See the thread on Alberto Rivera - an ex- Jesuit priest who exposed the truth of what he was trained to do.
 
Shame on you?

Shame on you.

Religious extremism sucks. Those that don't recognize it cry "moral equivalency".

African Christians are burning witches and excorsizing kids with acid. Sweet.


Your answer is completely without logic and once again you are descending to moral equivalence, which means you are attempting to change the subject and gloss over its seriousness

Even if your babble about African witches is true ...what possible comparison is there to the Islamic Caliphate State whose religious aim is to dominate the whole world under Sharia Law and maintain its barbaric practices.

Your babble is completly irrelevant!

People who use this moral equivalence garbage, seem to be condoning the actions of radical Islam by saying - "Well so what , a lot of others are doing it, so why shouldn't they?" -

Everybody who makes these disgusting , ignorant comparisons is only helping the enemy by being a useful donkey for radical Islam.

You can be sure that the enemy is fully aware of these "moral equivalence" comments and is greatly encouraged by them.

They are no doubt amazed by all the sympathy they get from the enemy, in other words the enemy is in the necessary state of submission like so many in this thread.


sky----the word "ENEMY" is relative ----relative to the person being considered. Al Qaeda may be YOUR enemy----but it
is not the enemy of coyote----nor is "isis" Placing a young pilot in a cage and setting him on fire may seem
like an atrocity and a crime to YOU-----but it is not so for coyote RELATIVE to WHO is doing the 'setting on fire'
and to what end. Your problem, sky----is that you do not
enjoy obscene sophistry

Speak for yourself you obscene creature. You only care if atrocities are committed by Muslims. Anyone else, well...it's just an aberration according to you and Skye - or perhaps it just doesn't count if it's not Muslim.
What you're hoping to side-step is that the burning alive of the Jordanian pilot brought into focus the continuing threat of islamo-fascism and its appeals to a resurgence of islamo-conquest and the islamo-caliphate proposed by ISIS.

You need to keep this latest incident of islamo-barbarism in context with the on-going islamo-atrocities taking place across the globe. The reality is that the thugs, misogynists and murderers that many converts and pom pom flailers find excuses for, live and thrive off of the infliction of death, destruction and suffering. They find a holy mandate for murder. They are, after all, following in the footsteps of the islamo-model for all humanity: muhammud (swish). "The way of the prophet" is what drives the swath of death and destruction across Iraq and Syria. ISIS sees Muhammud's (swish) design in destruction, suffering in pursuit of a caliphate.


the video served a couple of purposes

a recruitment tool

and

as a warning to other Muslims willing to fight

against isil
What does isil stand for?
 

Forum List

Back
Top